Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of diurnal dynamics in evaporation rate between bare soil and moss-crusted soil within a revegetated desert ecosystem of northwestern China

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of biological soil crusts (BSCs) on soil evaporation is quite controversial in literature, being either facilitative or inhibitive, and therein few studies have actually conducted direct evaporation measurements. Continuous field measurements of soil water evaporation were conducted on two microlysimeters, i.e., one with sand soil collected from bare sand dune area and the other with moss-crusted soil collected from an area that was revegetated in 1956, from field capacity to dry, at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert. We mainly aimed to quantify the diurnal variations of evaporation rate from two soils, and further comparatively discuss the effects of BSCs on soil evaporation after revegetation. Results showed that in clear days with high soil water content (Day 1 and 2), the diurnal variation of soil evaporation rate followed the typical convex upward parabolic curve, reaching its peak around mid-day. Diurnal evaporation rate and the accumulated evaporation amount of moss-crusted soil were lower (an average of 0.90 times) than that of sand soil in this stage. However, as soil water content decreased to a moderately low level (Day 3 and 4), the diurnal evaporation rate from moss-crusted soil was pronouncedly higher (an average of 3.91 times) than that of sand soil, prolonging the duration of this higher evaporation rate stage; it was slightly higher in the final stage (Day 5 and 6) when soil moisture was very low. We conclude that the effects of moss crusts on soil evaporation vary with different evaporation stages, which is closely related to soil water content, and the variation and transition of evaporation rate between bare soil and moss-crusted soil are expected to be predicted by soil water content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguiar M R and Sala O E 1999 Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems; Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (7) 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D and Smith M 1998 Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements–FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56; FAO, Rome 300 D05109 144–146.

  • Belnap J 2003 The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts; Front. Ecol. Environ. 1 (4) 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J 2006 The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles; Hydrol. Process. 20 (15) 3159–3178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J and Lange O L 2002 Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management; Springer, Berlin, Germany.

  • Belnap J, Welter J R, Grimm N B, Barger N and Ludwig J A 2005 Linkages between microbial and hydrologic processes in arid and semi-arid watersheds; Ecology 86 (2) 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndtsson R, Nodomi K, Yasuda H, Persson T, Chen H S and Jinno K 1996 Soil water and temperature patterns in an arid desert dune sand; J. Hydrol. 185 (1–4) 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker M A 2007 Biological soil crust rehabilitation in theory and practice: An underexploited opportunity; Restor. Ecol. 15 (1) 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotherson J D and Rushforth S R 1983 Influence of cryptogamic crusts on moisture relationships of soils in Navajo National Monument, Arizona; Great Basin Nat. 43 (1) 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo S, Canton Y, Domingo F and Belnap J 2013 Evaporative losses from soils covered by physical and different types of biological soil crusts; Hydrol. Process. 27 (3) 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola A, Basile A, Wang X P, Comegna V, Tedeschi A, Mele G and Comegna A 2011 Hydrological behaviour of microbiotic crusts on sand dunes: Example from NW China comparing infiltration in crusted and crust-removed soil; Soil Till. Res. 117 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer T, Veste M, Wiehe W and Lange P 2010 Water repellency and pore clogging at early successional stages of microbiotic crusts on inland dunes, Brandenburg, NE Germany; Catena 80 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D 1998 Environmental soil physics: Fundamentals, applications and environmental considerations; Academic Press, London, UK.

  • Johansen J R 1993 Cryptogamic crusts of semi-arid and arid lands of North America; J. Phycol. 29 (2) 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron G J and Tal S Y 2012 The effect of biocrusts on evaporation from sand dunes in the Negev Desert; Geoderma 179 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron G J, Yaalon D H and Vonshak A 1999 Two causes for runoff initiation on microbiotic crusts: Hydrophobicity and pore clogging; Soil Sci. 164 (1) 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laity J J 2009 Deserts and desert environments; John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

  • Lan S B, Wu L, Zhang D L and Hu C X 2012 Successional stages of biological soil crusts and their microstructure variability in Shapotou region (China); Environ. Earth Sci. 65 (1) 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R 2012 Eco-hydrology of biological soil crusts in desert regions of China; Higher Education Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, Xiao H L, He M Z and Zhang J G 2006 Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions; Ecol. Eng. 28 (2) 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, Kong D S, Tan H J and Wang X P 2007 Changes in soil and vegetation following stabilisation of dunes in the southeastern fringe of the Tengger Desert, China; Plant Soil 300 (1–2) 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, Tian F, Jia R L, Zhang Z S and Liu L C 2010 Do biological soil crusts determine vegetation changes in sandy deserts? Implications for managing artificial vegetation; Hydrol. Process. 24 (25) 3621–3630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L C, Li S Z, Duan Z H, Wang T, Zhang Z S and Li X R 2006 Effects of microbiotic crusts on dew deposition in the restored vegetation area at Shapotou, northwest China; J. Hydrol. 328 (1–2) 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L C, Song Y X, Gao Y H, Wang T and Li X R 2007 Effects of microbiotic crusts on evaporation from the revegetated area in a Chinese desert; Soil Res. 45 (6) 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I 1973 Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers; Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y X, Wang X P and Zhang Y F 2010 Dew formation characteristics in a revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystem in Shapotou area, northern China; J. Hydrol. 387 (3–4) 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair L L, Johansen J R and Rushforth S R 1993 Lichens of soil crust communities in the intermountain area of the western United States; Great Basin Nat. 53 (1) 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia E, Yair A, Kidron G J and Verrecchia K 1995 Physical properties of the psammophile cryptogamic crust and their consequences to the water regime of sandy soils, north-western Negev Desert, Israel; J. Arid Environ. 29 (4) 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Quan G J, Pan Y X, Hu R, Zhang Y F, Tedeschi A, Basile A, Comegna A, Coppola A and Mascellis R 2013 Comparison of hydraulic behaviour of unvegetated and vegetation-stabilized sand dunes in arid desert ecosystems; Ecohydrology 6 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Young M H, Yu Z, Li X R and Zhang Z S 2007 Long-term effects of restoration on soil hydraulic properties in revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystems; Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 (24) L24S22. doi:10.1029/2007GL031725.

    Google Scholar 

  • West N E 1990 Structure and function of microphytic soil crusts in wildland ecosystems of arid to semi-arid regions; Adv. Ecol. Res. 20 179–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao B, Zhao Y G and Shao M A 2010 Characteristics and numeric simulation of soil evaporation in biological soil crusts; J. Arid Environ. 74 (1) 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y F, Wang X P, Hu R, Pan Y X and Zhang H 2014 Variation of albedo to soil moisture for sand dunes and biological soil crusts in arid desert ecosystems; Environ. Earth Sci. 71 (3) 1281–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41530750), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501108, 41371101) and the CAS “Light of West China” Program. We appreciate the Associate Editor and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin-Ping Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, YF., Wang, XP., Pan, YX. et al. Comparison of diurnal dynamics in evaporation rate between bare soil and moss-crusted soil within a revegetated desert ecosystem of northwestern China. J Earth Syst Sci 125, 95–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0650-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0650-1

Keywords

Navigation