Abstract
Understanding the spectral properties of sources is crucial for the characterization of the radio source population. In this work, we have extensively studied the ELAIS N1 field using various low-frequency radio observations. For the first time, we presented the 1250 MHz observations of the field using the upgraded Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope (uGMRT) that reach a central off-source RMS noise of \(\sim \)12 \(\upmu \)Jy beam\(^{-1}\). A source catalog of 1086 sources is compiled at \(5\sigma \) threshold (>60 \(\upmu \)Jy) to derive the normalized differential source counts at this frequency, which is consistent with existing observations and simulations. We presented the spectral indices derived in two ways: two-point spectral indices and by fitting a power-law. The latter yielded a median \(\alpha = -0.57\pm 0.14\), and we identified nine ultra-steep spectrum sources using these spectral indices. Further, using a radio color diagram, we identified the three mega-hertz peaked spectrum (MPS) sources, while three other MPS sources are identified from the visual inspection of the spectra, the properties of which are discussed. In our study of the classified sources in the ELAIS N1 field, we presented the relationship between \(\alpha \) and z. We found no evidence of an inverse correlation between these two quantities and suggested that the nature of the radio spectrum remains independent of the large-scale properties of the galaxies that vary with redshifts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An F., Vaccari M., Best P. N. et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.06941
An T., Baan W. A. 2012, Astrophysical Journal, 760, 77
Athreya R. M., Kapahi V. K. 1999, in ed Sato K., IAU Symposium, Vol. 183, Cosmological Parameters and the Evolution of the Universe, p. 251
Best P. N., Arts J. N., Röttgering H. J. A. et al. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 346, 627
Best P. N., Kondapally R., Williams W. L. et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 1729
Bicknell G. V., Dopita M. A., O’Dea C. P. O. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 485, 112
Bicknell G. V., Mukherjee D., Wagner A. Y., Sutherland R. S., Nesvadba N. P. H. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475, 3493
Blundell K. M., Kuncic Z. 2007, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 668, L103
Blundell K. M., Rawlings S., Eales S. A., Taylor G. B., Bradley A. D. 1998, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 295, 265
Bolton A. S., Schlegel D. J., Aubourg É. et al. 2012, The Astronomical Journal, 144, 144
Bonaldi A., Bonato M., Galluzzi V. et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 2
Bonaldi A., Bonato M., Galluzzi V. et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 2
Bondi M., Ciliegi P., Schinnerer E. et al. 2008, Astrophysical Journal, 681, 1129
Bonzini M., Padovani P., Mainieri V. et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 436, 3759
Calistro R. G., Williams W. L., Hardcastle M. J. et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 3468
Callingham J. R., Gaensler B. M., Ekers R. D. et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 809, 168
Callingham J. R., Ekers R. D., Gaensler B. M. et al. 2017, Astrophysical Journal, 836, 174
Chakraborty A., Dutta P., Datta A., Roy N. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 3392
Chakraborty A., Roy N., Datta A. et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 243
Chambers K. C., Miley G. K., van Breugel W. J. M. 1990, Astrophysical Journal, 363, 21
Condon J. J. 1992, Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys, 30, 575
Coppejans R., Cseh D., Williams W. L., van Velzen S., Falcke H. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 450, 1477
Coppejans R., Cseh D., van Velzen S. et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459, 2455
De Breuck C., Hunstead R. W., Sadler E. M., Rocca-Volmerange B., Klamer I. 2004, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/MNRAS/347/837
Duncan K. J., Kondapally R., Brown M. J. I. et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 648, A4
Fabian A. C. 2012, Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys, 50, 455
Franzen T. M. O., Vernstrom T., Jackson C. A. et al. 2019, Publications of the Astron. Soc. of Australia, 36, e004
Franzen T. M. O., Banfield J. K., Hales C. A. et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 4020
Hale C. L., Williams W., Jarvis M. J. et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A4
Hardcastle M. J., Williams W. L., Best P. N. et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A12
Intema H. T., van Weeren R. J., Röttgering H. J. A., Lal D. V. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 535, A38
Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Taylor A. R., Green D. A. et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497, 5383
Ivison R. J., Alexander D. M., Biggs A. D. et al. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 402, 245
Keim M. A., Callingham J. R., Röttgering H. J. A. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 628, A56
Knopp G. P., Chambers K. C. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 487, 644
Magnelli B., Ivison R. J., Lutz D. et al. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 573, A45
Mahony E. K., Morganti R., Prandoni I., van Bemmel I., LOFAR Surveys Key Science Project. 2016a, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 135
Mahony E. K., Morganti R., Prandoni I. et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 463, 2997
Mandal S., Prandoni I., Hardcastle M. J. et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 648, A5
Miley G., De Breuck C. 2008, Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews, 15, 67
Miller P., Rawlings S., Saunders R. 1993, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 263, 425
Mohan N., Rafferty D. 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1502.007
Morabito L. K., Harwood J. J. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 2726
Murgia M., Fanti C., Fanti R. et al. 1999, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 345, 769
Ocran E. F., Taylor A. R., Vaccari M., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Prandoni I. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 1127
O’Dea C. P. 1998, Publications of the ASP, 110, 493
O’Dea C. P., Baum S. A. 1997, Astronomical Journal, 113, 148
Offringa A. R., Smirnov O. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 471, 301
Offringa A. R., McKinley B., Hurley-Walker N. et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444, 606
Orienti M. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 9
Orienti M., Dallacasa D., Tinti S., Stanghellini C. 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 450, 959
Padovani P. 2016, in Active Galactic Nuclei 12: A Multi-Messenger Perspective (AGN12), p. 14
Padovani P., Bonzini M., Kellermann K. I. et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 1263
Padovani P., Mainieri V., Tozzi P. et al. 2009, Astrophysical Journal, 694, 235
Padovani P., Miller N., Kellermann K. I. et al. 2011, Astrophysical Journal, 740, 20
Panessa F., Baldi R. D., Laor A. et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 387
Perley R. A., Butler B. J. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 230, 7
Prandoni I., de Ruiter H. R., Ricci R. et al. 2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 510, A42
Prandoni I., Guglielmino G., Morganti R. et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 481, 4548
Riseley C. J., Scaife A. M. M., Hales C. A. et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 462, 917
Roettgering H. J. A., Lacy M., Miley G. K., Chambers K. C., Saunders R. 1994, A &AS, 108, 79
Roettgering H. J. A., van Ojik R., Miley G. K. et al. 1997, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 326, 505
Rowan-Robinson M., Gonzalez-Solares E., Vaccari M., Marchetti L. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 428, 1958
Sabater J., Best P. N., Tasse C. et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 648, A2
Saxena A., Röttgering H. J. A., Duncan K. J. et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 489, 5053
Singh V., Chand H. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 1796
Singh V., Beelen A., Wadadekar Y. et al. 2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/569/A52
Sinha A., Basu A., Datta A., Chakraborty A. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 514, 4343
Smolčić V., Schinnerer E., Scodeggio M. et al. 2008, ApJS, 177, 14
Smolčić V., Delvecchio I., Zamorani G. et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 602, A2
Sopp H. M., Alexander P. 1991, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 251, 112
van Breugel W., Miley G., Heckman T. 1984, Astronomical Journal, 89, 5
White R. L., Becker R. H., Helfand D. J., Gregg M. D. 1997, Astrophysical Journal, 475, 479
Wilkinson P. N., Polatidis A. G., Readhead A. C. S., Xu W., Pearson T. J. 1994, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 432, L87
Williams W. L., Intema H. T., Röttgering H. J. A. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 549, A55
Williams W. L., van Weeren R. J., Rãttgering H. J. A. et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460, 2385
Wilman R. J., Miller L., Jarvis M. J. et al. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 388, 1335
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referee for their comments on the manuscript. We further would like to thank Arnab Chakraborty for his helpful suggestions. AS would like to thank DST for INSPIRE fellowship. We thank the staff of GMRT for making this observation possible. GMRT is run by National Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A. Positional and flux accuracies
Here, we compare the uGMRT 1.25 GHz catalog to the other radio catalogs in the literature. We have used the 1.4 GHz Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty centimeters (FIRST) survey (White et al. 1997), uGMRT catalog at 400 MHz from (for details, see Section 4, Chakraborty et al. 2019) the GMRT catalog at 610 MHz by Ishwara-Chandra et al. (2020) with the resolution of \(6''\). We used a search radius of \(2''.0\) to identify a cross-match in other catalogs. For the positional and flux accuracy analysis, we have applied a sample selection criteria of sources following Williams et al. (2016): High signal-to-noise ratio (\({>}10\)) sources, compact sources with size less than the resolution of the catalog and isolated sources for which the minimum distance between the two sources are greater than twice of the resolution.
1.1 Appendix A.1 Positional accuracy
The positional offsets in right ascension (RA) and declination (DEC) for the uGMRT sample at 1.25 GHz are measured as:
The FIRST catalog has positional accuracy better than \(1''\) with a resolution of \({\sim }5''\). We measured the median values in the deviation of RA and DEC using the FIRST catalog as \(-0.092''\) and \(-0.076''\), respectively. Figure 10(left) presents the offsets in RA and DEC for the uGMRT source catalog compared to the other catalogs, along with their histograms. The median offsets in RA and DEC, as measured from the GMRT 610 MHz and the uGMRT 400 MHz catalogs, are −0.07, −0.16 and −0.43, 0.59, respectively. It should be noted that the resolution of our catalog \({\sim }2''\) is better than the resolution of other catalogs \(\sim \)5\(''\)–6\(''\), and the median offset with the FIRST catalog is \({<}0.1''\). Hence, we do not apply any corrections in the source positions in our uGMRT catalog.
1.2 Appendix A.2 Flux accuracy
Our uGMRT 1.25 GHz catalog was generated using Perley & Butler (2017) flux scales. Each catalog will have different flux scales, therefore, we have made sure to convert them to the flux scales used in our work. We measured the ratio of the integrated flux density at 1.25 GHz with the other catalogs also scaled to 1.25 GHz using a constant spectral index value of −0.7. This ratio is defined as \(S_{\mathrm{1.25~GHz}}/ S_\textrm{other}\). In Figure 10(right), we show the comparison of \(S_{\mathrm{1.25 \ GHz}}\) with \(S_{\textrm{other}}\) and no significant deviation is observed from the \(S_{\mathrm{1.25 \ GHz}}/S_{\textrm{other}}=1\) line (black dashed line). The median \(S_{\mathrm{1.25~GHz}}/S_\textrm{other}\) ratio as derived using the FIRST, uGMRT 400 MHz and GMRT 610 MHz catalogs are \(0.99^{0.19}_{-0.37}\), \(1.11_{-0.51}^{0.25}\) and \(1.10_{-0.9}^{0.32}\), respectively. The errors quoted here are from the 16th and 84th percentiles. The median of the ratio is \(\sim \)1 for these cases and therefore, we do not suggest any correction for systematic offsets.
Appendix B. Spectra of USS sample
The spectra of the USS sources are shown in Figure 11.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, A., Mangla, S. & Datta, A. Spectral study of faint radio sources in ELAIS N1 field. J Astrophys Astron 44, 88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-023-09978-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-023-09978-0