Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present and evaluate a new technique to better understand ionospheric convection and it’s magnetospheric drivers using convection maps derived from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). We postulate that the directional derivative of the SuperDARN ionospheric convection flow can be used as a technique for understanding solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling by identifying regions of strong acceleration/deceleration of plasma flow associated with drivers of magnetospheric convection such as magnetic reconnection. Thus, the technique may be used to identify the open–closed magnetic field line boundary (OCB) in certain circumstances. In this study, directional derivatives of the SuperDARN ionospheric convection flow over a four and a half hour interval on Nov. 04, 2001, is presented during which the interplanetary magnetic field was predominantly southward. At each one-minute time point in the interval the positive peak in the directional derivative of flow is identified and evaluated via comparison with known indicators of the OCB including the poleward boundary of ultraviolet emissions from three FUV detectors onboard the IMAGE spacecraft as well as the SuperDARN spectral widths. Good comparison is found between the location of the peak in the directional derivative of SuperDARN flow and the poleward boundary of ultraviolet emissions confirming that acceleration of ionospheric plasma flow is associated with magnetic reconnection and the open–closed boundary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andre R., Pinnock M., Rodger A. S. 1999, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3353–3356
Baker K. B., Dudeney J. R., Greenwald R. A., Pinnock M., Newell P. T., Rodger A. S., Mattin N., Meng C.-I. 1995, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 7671–7695
Blanchard G. T., Lyons L. R., Samson J. C., Rich F. J. 1995, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 7855–7862
Boakes P. D., Milan S. E., Abel G. A., Freeman M. P., Chisham G., Hubert B., Sotirelis T. 2008, Annales Geophysicae 26, 2759–2769
Burch J. L., Reiff P. H., Menietti J. D., Heelis R. A., Hanson W. B., Shawhan S. D., Shelley E. G., Sugiura M., Wiemer D. R., Winningham J. D. 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 1577–1593
Chisham, G., Pinnock, M., Rodger, A. S. 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 191–202
Chisham G., Freeman M. P. 2004, Ann. Geophys. 22, 1187–1202
Chisham G., Freeman M. P., Sotirelis T. 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L02804
Chisham G., Freeman M. P., Lam M. M., Abel G. A., Sotirelis T., Greenwald R. A., Lester M. 2005a, Ann. Geophys. 12, 3645–3654
Chisham G., Freeman M. P., Sotirelis T., Greenwald R. A., Lester M., Villain J.-P. 2005b, Ann. Geophys. 23, 733–743
Chisham G., Lester M., Milan S. E., Freeman M. P., Bristow W. A., Grocott A., McWilliams K. A., Ruohoniemi J. M., Yeoman T. K., Dyson P. L., Greenwald R. A., Kikuchi T., Pinnock M., Rash J. P. S., Sato N., Sofko G. J., Villain J.-P., Walker A. D. M. 2007, Surveys in Geophysics 28, 33–109
Crooker N. U., 1986, Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 1063–1066
Crooker N. U. 1979, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 951–959
Dungey, J. W. 1961, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48
Evans L. C., Stone, E. C. 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 5580–5584
Fenrich F. R., Luhmann J. G., Fedder, J. A., Slinker S. P., Russell C. T. 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 18789–18802
Greenwald R. A., Baker K. B., Ruohoniemi J. M., Dudeney J. R., Pinnock M., Mattin N., Leonard J. M., Lepping R. P. 1990, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 8057–8072
Greenwald R. A., Baker K. B., Dudeney J. R., Pinnock M., Jones T. B., Thomas E. C., Villain J.-P., Cerisier J.-C., Senior C., Hanuise C., Hunsucker R. D., Sofko G., Koehler J., Nielsen E., Pellinen R., Walker A. D. M., Sato N., Yamagishi, H. 1995, Space Sci. Rev. 71, 761–796
Heppner J. P., Maynard N. C. 1987, J. Geophys. Res. 92:4467–4489
IMAGE 2013, https://spdf.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/data/image/fuv
Lester M., Milan S. E., Besser V., Smith, R. 2001, Ann. Geophys. 19, 327–339
Lester, M., Chapman, P. J., Cowley, S. W. H., Crooks, S. J., Davies, J. A., Hamadyk, P., McWilliams, K. A., Milan, S. E., Parsons, M. J., Payne, D. B., Thomas, E. C., Thornhill, J. D., Wade, N. M., Yeoman, T. K., Barnes, R. J. 2004, Ann. Geophys. 22, 459–473. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-459-2004
Lockwood M., Cowley S. W. H., Freeman M. P. 1990, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 7961–7972
Lockwood M., Cowley S. W. H. 1999, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 4387–4391
Lockwood M., Carlson Jr. H. C., Sandholt P. E. 1993, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 15,571–15,587
Longden N., Chisham G., Freeman M. P., Abel G. A., Sotirelis T. 2010, Ann. Geophys. 28, 1659–1678
Lu G., Richmond A. D., Emery B. A., Reiff P. H, de la Beaujardiere O., Rich F. J., Denig W. F., Kroehl H. W., Lyons L. R., Ruohoniemi J. M., Friis-Christensen E., Opgenoorth H., Persson M. A. L., Lepping R. P., Rodger A. S., Hughes T., McEwin A, Dennis S., Morris R., Burns G., Tomlinson L. 1994, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 6491–6510
Mende S. B., Heetderks H., Frey H. U., Lampton M., Geller S. P., Habraken S., Renotte E., Jamar C., Rochus P., Spann J., Fuselier S. A., Gerard J.-C., Gladstone R., Murphree S., Cogger L. 2000a, Space Sci. Rev. 91, 243–270
Mende S. B., Heetderks H., Frey H. U., Stock J. M., Lampton M., Geller S. P., Abiad R., Siegmund O. H. W., Habraken S., Renotte E., Jamar C., Rochus P., Gerard J.-C., Sigler R., Lauche H. 2000b, Space Sci. Rev. 91, 287–318
Newell P. T., Meng, C. I. 1992, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 609–612
Newell P. T., Ruohoniemi J. M., Meng C.-I. 2004, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A10206
Ponomarenko P. V., Waters C. L. 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30:1122
Reiff P. H., Burch J. L. 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 1595–1609
Ridley A. J, Lu G., Clauer C. R., Papitashvili V. O. 1998, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 4023–4039
Ruohoniemi J. M., Greenwald R. A. 1995, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1121–1124
Ruohoniemi J. M., Greenwald R. A. 1996, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 21,743–21,763
Ruohoniemi J. M., Baker, K. B. 1998, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 20,797–20,811
Schiffler A., Sofko G., Newell P. T., Greenwald R. A. 1997, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 3149–3152
Simon S. G., Rhuohoniemi, J. M. 2000, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23,005–23,014
Siscoe G. L. and Huang T. S. 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 543–547
Sonnerup, B. U. O., Paschmann, G., Papamastorakis, I., Sckopke, N., Haerendel, G., Bame, S. J., Asbridge, J. R., Gosling, J. T., Russell, C. T. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 10,049–10,067
Sotirelis T., Ruohoniemi J. M., Barnes R. J., Newell P. T., Greenwald R. A., Skura J. P., Meng C.-I. 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A06302
Superdarn 2014. http://superdarn.org
Villain, J-P., Andre R., Pinnock M., Greenwald, R. A., Hanuise, C. 2002, Ann. Geophys. 20, 1769–1781
Wild J. A., Milan S. E., Owen C. J., Bosqued J. M., Lester M., Wright D. M., Frey H., Carlson C. W., Fazakerley A. N., Rème H. 2004, Ann. Geophys. 22, 3625–3639
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors thank the SuperDARN PIs for providing the SuperDARN data and software. We gratefully acknowledge the IMAGE FUV Imager team and PI Stephen Mende. Auroral boundary data were derived and provided by the British Antarctic Survey based on IMAGE satellite data. The SuperDARN data were collected from superdarn.org. The OMNI data were obtained from the GSFC/SPDF OMNIWeb interface.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoque, S.N.M.A., Fenrich, F. A new technique for understanding magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling using directional derivatives of SuperDARN convection flow. J Astrophys Astron 39, 70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-018-9561-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-018-9561-2