Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid 3D printing and electrospinning technique for the production of air filter materials and the effect of different infill patterns on air permeability

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) samples with five different infill patterns (trihexagone, grid, gyroid, line and triangle) were covered with electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibres to investigate their air permeability properties. SEM results showed that PAN electrospun nanofibres were beadless and ordered nanofibres with an average diameter of 260.89 ± 32 nm. The tensile properties and air permeability of the PAN nanofibre-coated 3D-printed PLA samples were investigated. The results showed PAN nanofibre-coated 3D-printed PLA sample with gyroid infill pattern was favoured in terms of mechanical properties among five different infill patterns with its high tensile strain and Young’s modulus values, 4.18% and 977 MPa, respectively. Furthermore, while the air permeability properties of resulting PAN nanofibre-coated PLA materials were analysed, the lowest air permeability which means high particle capturing capability was obtained for line and gyroid with the air permeability values of 42 and 51 l m–2 s–1. While the mechanical properties and air permeability properties are evaluated together; gyroid with its excellent mechanical properties and low air permeability was favoured among the five different infill patterns. The production of this hybrid material could provide a new approach to the design and development of air filter materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pui D Y, Chen S C and Zuo Z 2014 Particuology 13 1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang C J 2021 J. Energy Chem. 60 417

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rismalia M, Hidajat S, Permana I, Hadisujoto B, Muslimin M and Triawan F 2019 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. IOP Publishing

  4. Dong B, Qi G, Gu X and Wei X 2008 Adv. Eng. Inform. 22 282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medellin-Castillo H I and Zaragoza-Siqueiros J 2019 Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 32 1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, Wang Q and Li D 2016 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. 88 198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tymrak B, Kreiger M and Pearce J M 2014 Mater. Des. 58 242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu S, Tahon J F, De-Waele I, Stoclet G and Gaucher V 2020 Express Polym. Lett. 14 1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ádám B and Weltsch Z 2021 Appl. Sci. 11 6218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teo W E and Ramakrishna S 2006 Nanotechnology 17 89

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bortolassi A C C, Nagarajan S, de Araújo Lima B, Guerra V G, Aguiar M L, Huon V et al 2019 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 102 718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patanaik A, Jacobs V and Anandjiwala R D 2010 J. Membr. Sci. 352 136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ince Yardimci A, Durmus A, Kayhan M and Tarhan O 2022 J. Macromol. Sci. Phys. 61 749

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu D G, Zhu L M, White K and Branford-White C 2009 Health 1 67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ince Yardimci A, Baskan O, Yilmaz S, Mese G, Ozcivici E and Selamet Y 2019 J. Biomater. Appl. 34 640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ince Yardimci A, Aypek H, Ozturk O, Yilmaz S, Ozcivici E, Mese G et al 2019 J. Biomim. Biomater. Biomed. Eng. 41 69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Unnithan A R, Barakat N A, Nirmala R, Al-Deyab S S and Kim H Y 2012 Ceram. Int. 38 5175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang L, Xie X, Huang H, Zhu J, Yu J, Wang Y et al 2020 Sens. Actuator A Phys. 302 111793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yardimci A I and Tarhan O 2020 Mugla J. Sci. Technol. 6 52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang Z M, Zhang Y, Ramakrishna S and Lim C 2004 Polymer 45 5361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyraz E, Yalcinkaya F, Hruza J and Maryska J 2019 Materials 12 2702

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wirth E, Sabantina L, Weber M O, Finsterbusch K and Ehrmann A 2018 Nanomaterials 8 746

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Charles L, Shaw M, Olson J and Wei M 2010 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 21 1845

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roche R and Yalcinkaya F 2018 Nanomaterials 8 771

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fu Q, Lin G, Chen X, Yu Z, Yang R, Li M et al 2018 Energy Technol. 6 144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin X H and Wang S Y 2008 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 109 951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen T, Bakhshi H, Liu L, Ji J and Agarwal S 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1800514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Mori A, Peña Fernández M, Blunn G, Tozzi G and Roldo M 2018 Polymers 10 285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu Y, Hua S, Yang M, Fu Z, Teng S, Niu K et al 2016 RSC Adv. 6 110557

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kozior T, Mamun A, Trabelsi M, Wortmann M, Lilia S and Ehrmann A 2019 Polymers 11 2034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rivera M L and Hudson S E 2019 Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems

  32. Varshney K, Tayal N and Gupta U 1998 Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 145 71Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hashmi M, Ullah S and Kim I S 2019 Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 1 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cho B G, Lee J E, Jeon S Y and Chae H G 2023 Polymer Test. 121 107983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pierpaoli M, Giosuè C, Czerwińska N, Rycewicz M, Wieloszyńska A, Bogdanowicz R et al 2021 Materials 14 6766

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang S X, Yap C C, He J, Chen C, Wong S Y and Li Xu 2016 Nanotechnol Rev. 5 51

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xu J, Liu C, Hsu P C, Liu K, Zhang R and Cui Y 2016 Nano Lett. 16 1270

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendoza-Buenrostro C and Rodriguez C L 2015 Procedia Eng. 110 128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yadav P, Sahai A and Sharma R S 2021 J. Eng. (India): Series C) 102 197

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ince Yardimci A and Acikbas Y 2022 Afyon Kocatepe Univ Int. J. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. 5 5

    Google Scholar 

  41. Khalil K A, Fouad H, Elsarnagawy T and Almajhdi F N 2013 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 3483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Aung S P S, Shein H H H, Aye K N and Nwe N 2018 Bio-based materials for food packaging. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  43. Silva C, Pais A I, Caldas G, Gouveia B P, Alves J L and Belinha J 2021 Prog. Addit. Manuf. 6 689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mao X, Bai Y, Yu J and Ding B 2016 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99 2760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Germain L, Fuentes C A, van Vuure A W and des Rieux A and Dupont-Gillain C, 2018 Mater. Des. 151 113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ayrilmis N, Nagarajan R and Kuzman M K 2020 Polymers 12 2929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Bean P, Lopez-Anido R A and Vel S 2022 Appl. Sci. 12 2180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ince Yardimci A 2022 Int. J. 3D Print. Technol. Digit. Ind. 6 307

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kara Y and Molnár K 2022 J. Ind. Text. 51 137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bourrous S, Barrault M, Mocho V, Poirier S, Bardin-Monnier N, Charvet A et al 2021 Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21 200615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu Y Q, Feng J W, Zhang C C, Teng Y, Liu Z and He J H 2018 Therm. Sci. 22 1637

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technology Transfer Office, Usak University, 64000, Uşak, Turkey

    Atike Ince Yardimci

  2. Department of Innovative Vehicles and Materials, John Von Neumann University, Kecskemet, 6000, Hungary

    Tóth László

  3. Department of Information Technology, Usak University, 64000, Uşak, Turkey

    Cagri Yardimci

Authors
  1. Atike Ince Yardimci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tóth László
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cagri Yardimci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atike Ince Yardimci.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ince Yardimci, A., László, T. & Yardimci, C. Hybrid 3D printing and electrospinning technique for the production of air filter materials and the effect of different infill patterns on air permeability. Bull Mater Sci 47, 49 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03134-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03134-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation