Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation of ZnO nanorod-based gas sensor and its ethanol gas sensing performance

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ZnO nanorods were prepared by a simple hydrothermal method using Zn(NO3)2·6H2O as a precursor, NaOH as precipitant, anhydrous ethanol as solvent and ethylenediamine as a template. The morphology, size and structure were observed by scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. The gas sensing response of ZnO nanorods to ethanol vapour was characterized by CGS-8 gas sensitivity analysis system. The results show that the response of ZnO nanorods-based gas sensor increases with the decrease of precursor concentration. The repeatability and concentration characteristics are good. The response of ZnO nanorods-based gas sensor is 33 when the concentration of Zn (NO3)2·6H2O is 0.1 mol·l−1. The optimal working temperature of the gas sensor is 275°C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ying S Y, Wang Y Y, Wu Z K, Huang M M, Dong L, Zhao J et al 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 566 150720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang J Y, Liang H, Ye J X, Jiang D T, Su Y L, Li X J et al 2021 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 346 130568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang Y L, Yu F, Zhang L, Wang W H, Chen L and Li Y C 2021 Solid State Ionics 360 115544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H F, Zhang X H, Zhu Y Q, Li R, Chen H Y, Gao P et al 2014 RSC Adv. 4 43772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Caicedo N, Leturcq R, Raskin J P, Flandre D and Lenoble D 2019 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 297 126602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ji Y, Wu L Y, Liu Y and Yang Y 2021 Nano Energy 89 106449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao S K, Shen Y B, Li A, Chen Y S, Gao S L, Liu W G et al 2021 Ceram. Int. 47 24218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmad M, Ahmad M K, Nafarizal N, Soon C F, Suriani A B, Mohamed A et al 2021 Microelectron. Eng. 248 111614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang C J, Hung S T, Lin C K, Chen C Y and Kuo E H 2010 Thin Solid Films 519 1693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Men H, Gao P, Zhou B B, Chen Y J, Zhu C L, Xiao G et al 2010 Chem. Commun. 46 7581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao P, Yang Z, Navale S T, Han S, Liu X, Liu W et al 2019 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 298 126850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hastir A, Kohli N and Singh R C 2017 Mater. Today 4 9476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tonkoshkur A S, Yu A and Povzlo E L 2018 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 255 1680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Talwar V, Singh O and Singh R C 2014 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 191 276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakate U T, Ahmad R, Patil P, Wang Y S, Bhat K S, Mahmoudi T et al 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 797 456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasapogle A E, Habashyani S, Baltakesmez A, Iskenderoglu D and Gur E 2021 Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 41 21715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim Y T, Son J Y and Rhee J S 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao R F, Ying Z H, Sheng W Q and Zheng P 2018 Mater. Lett. 229 210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhati V S, Hojamberdiev M and Kumar M 2020 Energy Rep. 6 46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meng L X, Xu Q, Sun Z, Li G D, Bai S, Wang Z H et al 2018 Mater. Lett. 212 296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaikh S K, Ganbavale U V, Mohite S V, Patil U M and Rajpure K Y 2018 Superlattice Microstuct. 120 170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao S K, Shen Y B, Yan X X, Zhou P F, Yin Y Y, Lu R et al 2019 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 286 501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hassan J J, Mahdi M A, Chin C W, Hassan H A and Hassan Z 2012 Physica E 46 254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosa E, Guzman S S, Reejajayan B, Torres A, Salas P and Elizondo N 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 8489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei W, Zhao J, Shi S, Lin H, Mao Z, Zhang F et al 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 6734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y D, Zheng Z and Yang F L 2010 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 3539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chao J F, Yu H J, Zhang K, Zhou Y, Meng D S and Sun Y G 2023 ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6 5994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ding J, Zhu J W, Yao P C, Li J, Bi H P and Wang X 2015 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 8947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Govindhan M, Sidhureddy B and Chen A 2018 ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 1 6005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tian S Q, Yang F, Zeng D and Xie C S 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 10586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62274141).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yidong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Dong, Z. & Jia, H. Preparation of ZnO nanorod-based gas sensor and its ethanol gas sensing performance. Bull Mater Sci 46, 180 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03024-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03024-z

Keywords

Navigation