Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factorial design, processing, characterization and microstructure analysis of PIP-based C/SiC composites

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymer impregnation and pyrolysis (PIP) process-based C/SiC composites are fabricated using the in-house synthesized methyl-polycarbosilane (PCS). Two-level factorial design matrix is employed to carry out experiments to study the effect of four factors on flexural strength of the composite. Total sixteen sets of composite samples are fabricated. Response table, normal probability plot, ANOVA and regression analysis are carried out to determine the statistical significant factors. Composite density (\(\rho \)), fibre volume fraction (\(V_{\mathrm{f}}\)) and pyrolysis temperature (T) are found to be statistically significant, while softening point (SP) of the PCS and interaction of these four factors are found insignificant. Higher levels of the density and \(V_{\mathrm{f} }\) have shown positive effect, while the pyrolysis temperature has negative effect on the flexural strength of the composites. Flexural strength was found to be in the range of 374–592 MPa depending on the process parameters. The mechanical behaviour of the composites at different process conditions was explained with the help of their microstructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krenkle W 2005 (ed) N P Bansal Handbook of ceramic composites (Academic Publishers) p 117

  2. Suresh K, Anil K, Sampath K, Bhanu Prasad V V, Chaudhary J C, Gupta A K et al 2013 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31 2425

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suresh K, Anil K, Ramesh Babu M and Raghvendra Rao M 2015 Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 12 (Suppl. 3) E176

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt S, Beyer S, Knabe H, Immich H, Meistring R and Gessler A 2004 Acta Astronaut. 55 409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao S, Zhou X, Yu J and Mummery P 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 559 808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao S, Zhou X and Jinshan Y 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 3879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jian K, Chen Z-H, Ma Q-S and Zheng W-W 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 390 154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu B, Dong S, Wang Z, Kan Y, Zhang L and Zhou F 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 4729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jian K, Chen Z-H, Ma Q-S, Hu H-F and Zheng W-W 2007 Ceram. Int. 33 905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Cheng H, Wang J and Tang G 2010 Ceram. Int. 36 2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rebillat F, Lamon J and Guette A 2000 Acta Mater. 48 4609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Braginsky M and Przybyla C P 2016 Compos. Struct. 136 538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch D, Tushtev K and Grathwohl G 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Njoya D and Hajjaji M 2015 J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 3 32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jian K, Chen Z-H, Ma Q-S, HuHai F and Zheng W-W 2007 Ceram. Int. 33 73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo Z, Zhou X, Yu J, Sun K and Wang F 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yin J, Lee S-H, Feng L, Zhu Y, Liu X, Huang Z et al 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 4145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma C, Guo L, Li H, Tan W, Duan T, Liu N et al 2016 Des. 90 373

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao S, Zhou X and Yu J 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 3879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sreeja R, Swaminathan B, Anil P, Sebastian T V and Packirisamy S 2010 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 168 204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang B, Zhou X and Yu J 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 4207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang H, Zhu D, Mu Y, Zhou W and Luo F 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 14094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Palanikumar K and Karthikeyan R 2007 Mater. Des. 28 1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saxena A K, Ashok R, Rajesh Kumar T and Mathur G N 2011 Indian patent no. 249015

  25. Kumar S, Misra M K, Mondal S, Gupta R K, Mishra R, Ranjan A et al 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 12849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Praderea C and Sauder C 2008 Carbon 46 1874

  27. Li Z and Bradt R C 1986 J. Mater. Sci. 21 4366

  28. Yoshio H 1989 J. Mater. Sci. 24 1177

  29. Lochner R H and Mater J E 1990 Designing for quality (London: Chapman and Hall)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Miller I and Freund J E 1985 Probability and statistics for engineers (New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India)

  31. Karandikar P G and Chou T-W 1992 Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 13 881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ochiai S, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Kimura S and Hojo M 2002 Compos.: A 33 1337

  33. Koch D, Tushtev K and Grathwohl G 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the support extended by central characterization facility, DMSRDE, for carrying out TGA and SEM. Funding from DRDO is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Kumar.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Procedure for estimating fibre volume fraction in the composite sample

Required number tows of 6K carbon fibre are wound to get composite of length (L, length of the each composite sample is fixed to 250 mm), width (W, width of the composite samples varied between 5 and 10 mm) and thickness (t, thickness of the composite sample was 0.9–1.7 mm). Typical scheme of UD composite is shown as figure 10. Fibre volume fraction in the composite samples was estimated using the following formula:

$$\begin{aligned} {V}_\mathrm{f} =\frac{{n{*} {Wt}_{1}} /{\rho }_\mathrm{carbon \,fiber}}{{L {*} W {*} t}} \end{aligned}$$

where

  • n = number of carbon fibre tows wound in the graphite fixture slot and number of tows present in composite sample,

  • \({Wt}_{1}\) = average weight of a single carbon fibre tow of 250 mm length (g),

  • \({\rho }_\mathrm{carbon\, fiber}\) = the density of carbon fibre in g \(\hbox {cm}^{-3} \), as per the supplier and manufacturer, density of the T300 carbon fibres is 1.76 g \(\hbox {cm}^{-3}\),

  • L = length of the composite (kept fixed,equal to 250 mm),

  • W = width of the composite,

  • t = thickness of the composite.

The following steps were followed to estimate the fibre volume fraction.

  1. Step 1:

    Average weight of a single 6K carbon fibre tow of 250 mm length was determined. A long tow of 25 m length was cut and weighed on a digital balance with least count of 10 mg. The weight of 25 m long tow was divided by 100 to get weight of a 250 mm long tow. The weight of 250 mm long, 6 K carbon fibre tow \(({ Wt}_{1}\)) was found to be 0.088 g.

  2. Step 2:

    Dimensions of the composite samples was measured using the digital vernier calipers.

  3. Step 3:

    Using the above formula, the following typical calculations were made to estimate \(V_{\mathrm{f}}\) in the final composite samples of length 250 mm. Some typical estimated values are given in the below table.

n

N * \({Wt}_{1 }\)(g)

Fibre volume (\(\hbox {cm}^{3}\))

W(cm)

t (cm)

\(V_{\mathrm{f}}\)

9

0.792

0.45

0.5

0.09

0.4

17

1.496

0.85

0.5

0.17

0.4

18

1.584

0.90

1.0

0.09

0.4

27

2.376

1.35

1.0

0.09

0.6

34

2.992

1.70

1.0

0.17

0.4

51

4.488

2.55

1.0

0.17

0.6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Bablu, M., Janghela, S. et al. Factorial design, processing, characterization and microstructure analysis of PIP-based C/SiC composites. Bull Mater Sci 41, 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1535-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1535-5

Keywords

Navigation