Abstract
Polymer impregnation and pyrolysis (PIP) process-based C/SiC composites are fabricated using the in-house synthesized methyl-polycarbosilane (PCS). Two-level factorial design matrix is employed to carry out experiments to study the effect of four factors on flexural strength of the composite. Total sixteen sets of composite samples are fabricated. Response table, normal probability plot, ANOVA and regression analysis are carried out to determine the statistical significant factors. Composite density (\(\rho \)), fibre volume fraction (\(V_{\mathrm{f}}\)) and pyrolysis temperature (T) are found to be statistically significant, while softening point (SP) of the PCS and interaction of these four factors are found insignificant. Higher levels of the density and \(V_{\mathrm{f} }\) have shown positive effect, while the pyrolysis temperature has negative effect on the flexural strength of the composites. Flexural strength was found to be in the range of 374–592 MPa depending on the process parameters. The mechanical behaviour of the composites at different process conditions was explained with the help of their microstructures.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12034-017-1535-5/MediaObjects/12034_2017_1535_Fig10_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krenkle W 2005 (ed) N P Bansal Handbook of ceramic composites (Academic Publishers) p 117
Suresh K, Anil K, Sampath K, Bhanu Prasad V V, Chaudhary J C, Gupta A K et al 2013 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31 2425
Suresh K, Anil K, Ramesh Babu M and Raghvendra Rao M 2015 Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 12 (Suppl. 3) E176
Schmidt S, Beyer S, Knabe H, Immich H, Meistring R and Gessler A 2004 Acta Astronaut. 55 409
Zhao S, Zhou X, Yu J and Mummery P 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 559 808
Zhao S, Zhou X and Jinshan Y 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 3879
Jian K, Chen Z-H, Ma Q-S and Zheng W-W 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 390 154
Wu B, Dong S, Wang Z, Kan Y, Zhang L and Zhou F 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 4729
Jian K, Chen Z-H, Ma Q-S, Hu H-F and Zheng W-W 2007 Ceram. Int. 33 905
Liu H, Cheng H, Wang J and Tang G 2010 Ceram. Int. 36 2033
Rebillat F, Lamon J and Guette A 2000 Acta Mater. 48 4609
Braginsky M and Przybyla C P 2016 Compos. Struct. 136 538
Koch D, Tushtev K and Grathwohl G 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 1165
Njoya D and Hajjaji M 2015 J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 3 32
Jian K, Chen Z-H, Ma Q-S, HuHai F and Zheng W-W 2007 Ceram. Int. 33 73
Luo Z, Zhou X, Yu J, Sun K and Wang F 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 1939
Yin J, Lee S-H, Feng L, Zhu Y, Liu X, Huang Z et al 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 4145
Ma C, Guo L, Li H, Tan W, Duan T, Liu N et al 2016 Des. 90 373
Zhao S, Zhou X and Yu J 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 3879
Sreeja R, Swaminathan B, Anil P, Sebastian T V and Packirisamy S 2010 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 168 204
Yang B, Zhou X and Yu J 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 4207
Wang H, Zhu D, Mu Y, Zhou W and Luo F 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 14094
Palanikumar K and Karthikeyan R 2007 Mater. Des. 28 1584
Saxena A K, Ashok R, Rajesh Kumar T and Mathur G N 2011 Indian patent no. 249015
Kumar S, Misra M K, Mondal S, Gupta R K, Mishra R, Ranjan A et al 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 12849
Praderea C and Sauder C 2008 Carbon 46 1874
Li Z and Bradt R C 1986 J. Mater. Sci. 21 4366
Yoshio H 1989 J. Mater. Sci. 24 1177
Lochner R H and Mater J E 1990 Designing for quality (London: Chapman and Hall)
Miller I and Freund J E 1985 Probability and statistics for engineers (New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India)
Karandikar P G and Chou T-W 1992 Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 13 881
Ochiai S, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Kimura S and Hojo M 2002 Compos.: A 33 1337
Koch D, Tushtev K and Grathwohl G 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 1165
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge the support extended by central characterization facility, DMSRDE, for carrying out TGA and SEM. Funding from DRDO is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Procedure for estimating fibre volume fraction in the composite sample
Required number tows of 6K carbon fibre are wound to get composite of length (L, length of the each composite sample is fixed to 250 mm), width (W, width of the composite samples varied between 5 and 10 mm) and thickness (t, thickness of the composite sample was 0.9–1.7 mm). Typical scheme of UD composite is shown as figure 10. Fibre volume fraction in the composite samples was estimated using the following formula:
where
-
n = number of carbon fibre tows wound in the graphite fixture slot and number of tows present in composite sample,
-
\({Wt}_{1}\) = average weight of a single carbon fibre tow of 250 mm length (g),
-
\({\rho }_\mathrm{carbon\, fiber}\) = the density of carbon fibre in g \(\hbox {cm}^{-3} \), as per the supplier and manufacturer, density of the T300 carbon fibres is 1.76 g \(\hbox {cm}^{-3}\),
-
L = length of the composite (kept fixed,equal to 250 mm),
-
W = width of the composite,
-
t = thickness of the composite.
The following steps were followed to estimate the fibre volume fraction.
-
Step 1:
Average weight of a single 6K carbon fibre tow of 250 mm length was determined. A long tow of 25 m length was cut and weighed on a digital balance with least count of 10 mg. The weight of 25 m long tow was divided by 100 to get weight of a 250 mm long tow. The weight of 250 mm long, 6 K carbon fibre tow \(({ Wt}_{1}\)) was found to be 0.088 g.
-
Step 2:
Dimensions of the composite samples was measured using the digital vernier calipers.
-
Step 3:
Using the above formula, the following typical calculations were made to estimate \(V_{\mathrm{f}}\) in the final composite samples of length 250 mm. Some typical estimated values are given in the below table.
n | N * \({Wt}_{1 }\)(g) | Fibre volume (\(\hbox {cm}^{3}\)) | W(cm) | t (cm) | \(V_{\mathrm{f}}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9 | 0.792 | 0.45 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.4 |
17 | 1.496 | 0.85 | 0.5 | 0.17 | 0.4 |
18 | 1.584 | 0.90 | 1.0 | 0.09 | 0.4 |
27 | 2.376 | 1.35 | 1.0 | 0.09 | 0.6 |
34 | 2.992 | 1.70 | 1.0 | 0.17 | 0.4 |
51 | 4.488 | 2.55 | 1.0 | 0.17 | 0.6 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Bablu, M., Janghela, S. et al. Factorial design, processing, characterization and microstructure analysis of PIP-based C/SiC composites. Bull Mater Sci 41, 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1535-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1535-5