Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pro-oxidant combination of resveratrol and copper reduces chemotherapy-related non-haematological toxicities in advanced gastric cancer: results of a prospective open label phase II single-arm study (RESCU III study)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been reported that chemotherapy toxicity is primarily not due to the drugs themselves, but is caused by cell-free chromatin particles (cfChPs) that are released from chemotherapy-induced dying cells. cfChPs from dying cells are readily internalized by healthy cells, wherein they inflict dsDNA breaks and activate inflammatory cytokines. cfChPs can be deactivated by oxygen radicals that are generated upon admixing the nutraceuticals resveratrol (R) and copper (Cu). Pre-clinical studies have shown that administration of R-Cu can reduce chemotherapy toxicity via the generation of oxygen radicals which deactivate cfChPs released from chemotherapy-induced dying cells. We investigated if R-Cu would reduce toxicity of docetaxel-based multi-agent chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. This single-arm phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of orally administered R-Cu in ameliorating toxic side effects, as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03, in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving docetaxel-based multi-agent chemotherapy. The primary objective was to reduce the proportion of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 toxicity from 90 to 70%. Between October 2019 and April 2021, 30 patients, with a median age of 54 years, were enrolled of whom 73% were male. R-Cu treatment did not reduce the overall cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity (77%), or of ≥ 3 haematological toxicity (73%). However, the incidence of non-haematological toxicities comprising hand-foot syndrome (N = 4), diarrhoea (N = 3) and vomiting (N = 1) were markedly reduced (13%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% CI: 5.9–10.1), and overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% confidence interval: 6.3–28.3). A marked reduction in non-haematological toxicities was seen in patients receiving R-Cu compared to historical data without adversely affecting PFS or OS. (292).

Clinical trial information CTRI/2019/07/020289.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah MA, Janjigian YY, Stoller R, Shibata S, Kemeny M, Krishnamurthi S, et al. Randomized multicenter phase ii study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) versus DCF plus growth factor support in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a study of the US gastric cancer consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(33):3874–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10294):27–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajani JA, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. V-325 Study group. Quality of life with docetaxel plus cisplatin and fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil from a phase III trial for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: the V-325 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(22):3210–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.3956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mittra I, Pal K, Pancholi N, Shaikh A, Rane B, Tidke P, Nair NK. Prevention of chemotherapy toxicity by agents that neutralize or degrade cell-free chromatin. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(9):2119–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diaz-Gerevini GT, Repossi G, Dain A, Tarres MC, Das UN, Eynard AR. Beneficial action of resveratrol: how and why? Nutrition. 2016;32(2):174–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bost M, Houdart S, Oberli M, Kalonji E, Huneau JF, Margaritis I. Dietary copper and human health: current evidence and unresolved issues. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2016;35:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.02.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuhara K, Miyata N. Resveratrol as a new type of DNA-cleaving agent. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:3187–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(98)00585-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittra I, Samant U, Sharma S, Raghuram GV, Saha T, Tidke P, et al. Cell-free chromatin from dying cancer cells integrate into genomes of bystander healthy cells to induce DNA damage and inflammation. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittra I, Pal K, Pancholi N, Tidke P, Siddiqui S, Rane B, et al. Cell-free chromatin particles released from dying host cells are global instigators of endotoxin sepsis in mice. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0229017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Subramaniam S, Vohra I, Iyer A, Nair NK, Mittra I. A paradoxical relationship between resveratrol and copper (II) with respect to degradation of DNA and RNA. F1000Research. 2015;4:1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal A, Khandelwal A, Pal K, Khare NK, Jadhav V, et al. A novel pro-oxidant combination of resveratrol and copper reduces transplant related toxicities in patients receiving high dose melphalan for multiple myeloma (RESCU 001). PLoS ONE. 2022;17(2): e0262212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ostwal V, Bose S, Sirohi B, Poladia B, Sahu A, Bhargava P, et al. Docetaxel/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (TEX) triplet followed by continuation monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Indian J Cancer. 2018;55(1):88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Engels FK, Loos WJ, van der Bol JM, de Bruijn P, Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring for the individualization of docetaxel dosing: a randomized pharmacokinetic study. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(2):353–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenmotsu H, Tanigawara Y. Pharmacokinetics, dynamics and toxicity of docetaxel: why the Japanese dose differs from the Western dose. Cancer Sci. 2015;106(5):497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Babu KG, Chaudhuri T, Lakshmaiah KC, Dasappa L, Jacob LA, Suresh Babu MC, et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life with epirubicin, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy regimens as first-line systemic therapy in locally advanced inoperable or metastatic gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a prospective study from South India. South Asian J Cancer. 2018;7(1):11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruno R, Hille D, Riva A, Vivier N, ten BokkelHuinnink WW, van Oosterom AT, et al. Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in phase II studies in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(1):187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The study was supported by Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India through its grant CTCTMC to Tata Memorial Centre awarded to IM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VO contributed to concept, design, data collection, patient recruitment, data analysis and manuscript finalization, PB contributed to data collection, patient recruitment, data analysis and manuscript finalization, AR contributed to data collection, patient recruitment, data analysis and manuscript finalization, SS contributed to data collection, patient recruitment, data analysis and manuscript finalization, SM contributed to data collection, data analysis and manuscript finalization, DC contributed to data analysis and manuscript finalization, ZP contributed to data collection, data analysis and manuscript finalization, AB contributed to data analysis and manuscript finalization, HT contributed to drug dispensing, data collection, data analysis and manuscript finalization, VKJ contributed to drug dispensing, data collection, data analysis and manuscript finalization, SS contributed to data collection, data analysis and manuscript finalization, SJ contributed to drug dispensing, data collection, data analysis and manuscript finalization, VG contributed to data analysis and manuscript finalization, IM contributed to concept, design, data collection, patient recruitment, data analysis and manuscript finalization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indraneel Mittra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ostwal, V., Ramaswamy, A., Bhargava, P. et al. A pro-oxidant combination of resveratrol and copper reduces chemotherapy-related non-haematological toxicities in advanced gastric cancer: results of a prospective open label phase II single-arm study (RESCU III study). Med Oncol 40, 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01862-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01862-1

Keywords

Navigation