Skip to main content
Log in

Elevated levels of epithelial cell transforming sequence 2 predicts poor prognosis for prostate cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epithelial cell transforming sequence 2 (Ect2) was originally reported as an oncogene that is involved in several types of human cancers. However, little is known about its expression and function in prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical staining for Ect2 was performed on a human tissue microarray. The staining intensity was analyzed in association with clinical pathological parameters such as Gleason score, pathological grade, clinical stage, tumor invasion, lymph node and distant metastasis. Furthermore, we repeated such analysis and investigated the prognostic value of Ect2 using the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) Dataset. Our immunohistochemical results showed that the expression levels of Ect2 protein were enhanced in human prostate cancer tissues. There existed positive correlations between the expression levels of Ect2 and several clinicopathological parameters, including advanced clinical stage, enhanced tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. Similarly, we found that the expression levels of Ect2 were positively related to Gleason score, tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and high distant metastasis in the TCGA Dataset. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that lower levels of Ect2 mRNA predicted higher overall survivals and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survivals in all patients or non-metastatic patients. Multivariate analysis by Cox regression showed that the expression of Ect2 could be an independent prognostic marker of poor BCR-free survivals. Therefore, levels of Ect2 may serve as a novel marker for the diagnosis or prognosis of prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuzick J, Thorat MA, Andriole G, et al. Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):e484–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, et al. Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):126–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Selvadurai ED, Singhera M, Thomas K, et al. Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):981–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Attard G, Parker C, Eeles RA, et al. Prostate cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):70–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1079–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kattan MW, Vickers AJ, Yu C, et al. Preoperative and postoperative nomograms incorporating surgeon experience for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(5):1005–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Draisma G, Etzioni R, Tsodikov A, et al. Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(6):374–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ, et al. Five-year follow-up of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(2):291–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito S, Liu XF, Kamijo K, et al. Deregulation and mislocalization of the cytokinesis regulator ECT2 activate the Rho signaling pathways leading to malignant transformation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(8):7169–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takai S, Long JE, Yamada K, et al. Chromosomal localization of the human ECT2 proto-oncogene to 3q26.1 → q26.2 by somatic cell analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics. 1995;27(1):220–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miki T, Smith CL, Long JE, et al. Oncogene ect2 is related to regulators of small GTP-binding proteins. Nature. 1993;362(6419):462–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatsumoto T, Xie X, Blumenthal R, et al. Human ECT2 is an exchange factor for Rho GTPases, phosphorylated in G2/M phases, and involved in cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 1999;147(5):921–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matthews HK, Delabre U, Rohn JL, et al. Changes in Ect2 localization couple actomyosin-dependent cell shape changes to mitotic progression. Dev Cell. 2012;23(2):371–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuce O, Piekny A, Glotzer M. An ECT2-centralspindlin complex regulates the localization and function of RhoA. J Cell Biol. 2005;170(4):571–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Greer ER, Chao AT, Bejsovec A. Pebble/ECT2 RhoGEF negatively regulates the Wingless/Wnt signaling pathway. Development. 2013;140(24):4937–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fields AP, Justilien V. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Ect2 is an oncogene in human cancer. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2010;50(1):190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li H, Peyrollier K, Kilic G, et al. Rho GTPases and cancer. BioFactors. 2014;40(2):226–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murata Y, Minami Y, Iwakawa R, et al. ECT2 amplification and overexpression as a new prognostic biomarker for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(4):490–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo Y, Qin SL, Mu YF, et al. Elevated expression of ECT2 predicts unfavorable prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;73:135–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang HB, Yan HC, Liu Y. Clinical significance of ECT2 expression in tissue and serum of gastric cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18(7):735–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Su KC, Takaki T, Petronczki M. Targeting of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the equatorial membrane controls cleavage furrow formation during cytokinesis. Dev Cell. 2011;21(6):1104–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Justilien V, Fields AP. Ect2 links the PKCiota-Par6alpha complex to Rac1 activation and cellular transformation. Oncogene. 2009;28(41):3597–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu J, Yao Q, Hou Y, et al. MiR-223/Ect2/p21 signaling regulates osteosarcoma cell cycle progression and proliferation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013;67(5):381–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Xia H, Zhang X, et al. ECT2 regulates the Rho/ERK signalling axis to promote early recurrence in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1287–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fortin SP, Ennis MJ, Schumacher CA, et al. Cdc42 and the guanine nucleotide exchange factors Ect2 and trio mediate Fn14-induced migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10(7):958–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gurkar AU, Chu K, Raj L, et al. Identification of ROCK1 kinase as a critical regulator of Beclin1-mediated autophagy during metabolic stress. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo JY, Xia B, White E. Autophagy-mediated tumor promotion. Cell. 2013;155(6):1216–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang X, Zhong W, Huang H, et al. Autophagy defects suggested by low levels of autophagy activator MAP1S and high levels of autophagy inhibitor LRPPRC predict poor prognosis of prostate cancer patients. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54(10):1194–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Till A, Saito R, Merkurjev D, et al. Evolutionary trends and functional anatomy of the human expanded autophagy network. Autophagy. 2015;11(9):1652–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 81472382, 81672550), the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (No: 2014A030313079), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No: 14ykpy19), Guangdong Province Science and Technology for Social Development Project (No: 2013B021800107), Guangdong Province Science and Technology for International Cooperation of Science (No: 2016A050502020)and Guangzhou City 2015 Scientific Research Projects (No: 201510010298) to Hai Huang; and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 81272807) to Zhenghui Guo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Leyuan Liu or Hai Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This project is a retrospective study and in accordance with ethics review regulations and was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University on December 30, 2015.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Zhenghui Guo, Xianju Chen and Tao Du contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Z., Chen, X., Du, T. et al. Elevated levels of epithelial cell transforming sequence 2 predicts poor prognosis for prostate cancer. Med Oncol 34, 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0872-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0872-3

Keywords

Navigation