Abstract
Epithelial cell transforming sequence 2 (Ect2) was originally reported as an oncogene that is involved in several types of human cancers. However, little is known about its expression and function in prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical staining for Ect2 was performed on a human tissue microarray. The staining intensity was analyzed in association with clinical pathological parameters such as Gleason score, pathological grade, clinical stage, tumor invasion, lymph node and distant metastasis. Furthermore, we repeated such analysis and investigated the prognostic value of Ect2 using the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) Dataset. Our immunohistochemical results showed that the expression levels of Ect2 protein were enhanced in human prostate cancer tissues. There existed positive correlations between the expression levels of Ect2 and several clinicopathological parameters, including advanced clinical stage, enhanced tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. Similarly, we found that the expression levels of Ect2 were positively related to Gleason score, tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and high distant metastasis in the TCGA Dataset. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that lower levels of Ect2 mRNA predicted higher overall survivals and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survivals in all patients or non-metastatic patients. Multivariate analysis by Cox regression showed that the expression of Ect2 could be an independent prognostic marker of poor BCR-free survivals. Therefore, levels of Ect2 may serve as a novel marker for the diagnosis or prognosis of prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.
Cuzick J, Thorat MA, Andriole G, et al. Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):e484–92.
Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, et al. Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):126–31.
Selvadurai ED, Singhera M, Thomas K, et al. Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):981–7.
Attard G, Parker C, Eeles RA, et al. Prostate cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):70–82.
Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1079–92.
Kattan MW, Vickers AJ, Yu C, et al. Preoperative and postoperative nomograms incorporating surgeon experience for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(5):1005–10.
Draisma G, Etzioni R, Tsodikov A, et al. Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(6):374–83.
Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ, et al. Five-year follow-up of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(2):291–6.
Saito S, Liu XF, Kamijo K, et al. Deregulation and mislocalization of the cytokinesis regulator ECT2 activate the Rho signaling pathways leading to malignant transformation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(8):7169–79.
Takai S, Long JE, Yamada K, et al. Chromosomal localization of the human ECT2 proto-oncogene to 3q26.1 → q26.2 by somatic cell analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics. 1995;27(1):220–2.
Miki T, Smith CL, Long JE, et al. Oncogene ect2 is related to regulators of small GTP-binding proteins. Nature. 1993;362(6419):462–5.
Tatsumoto T, Xie X, Blumenthal R, et al. Human ECT2 is an exchange factor for Rho GTPases, phosphorylated in G2/M phases, and involved in cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 1999;147(5):921–8.
Matthews HK, Delabre U, Rohn JL, et al. Changes in Ect2 localization couple actomyosin-dependent cell shape changes to mitotic progression. Dev Cell. 2012;23(2):371–83.
Yuce O, Piekny A, Glotzer M. An ECT2-centralspindlin complex regulates the localization and function of RhoA. J Cell Biol. 2005;170(4):571–82.
Greer ER, Chao AT, Bejsovec A. Pebble/ECT2 RhoGEF negatively regulates the Wingless/Wnt signaling pathway. Development. 2013;140(24):4937–46.
Fields AP, Justilien V. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Ect2 is an oncogene in human cancer. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2010;50(1):190–200.
Li H, Peyrollier K, Kilic G, et al. Rho GTPases and cancer. BioFactors. 2014;40(2):226–35.
Murata Y, Minami Y, Iwakawa R, et al. ECT2 amplification and overexpression as a new prognostic biomarker for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(4):490–7.
Luo Y, Qin SL, Mu YF, et al. Elevated expression of ECT2 predicts unfavorable prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;73:135–9.
Wang HB, Yan HC, Liu Y. Clinical significance of ECT2 expression in tissue and serum of gastric cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18(7):735–42.
Su KC, Takaki T, Petronczki M. Targeting of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the equatorial membrane controls cleavage furrow formation during cytokinesis. Dev Cell. 2011;21(6):1104–15.
Justilien V, Fields AP. Ect2 links the PKCiota-Par6alpha complex to Rac1 activation and cellular transformation. Oncogene. 2009;28(41):3597–607.
Xu J, Yao Q, Hou Y, et al. MiR-223/Ect2/p21 signaling regulates osteosarcoma cell cycle progression and proliferation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013;67(5):381–6.
Chen J, Xia H, Zhang X, et al. ECT2 regulates the Rho/ERK signalling axis to promote early recurrence in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1287–95.
Fortin SP, Ennis MJ, Schumacher CA, et al. Cdc42 and the guanine nucleotide exchange factors Ect2 and trio mediate Fn14-induced migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10(7):958–68.
Gurkar AU, Chu K, Raj L, et al. Identification of ROCK1 kinase as a critical regulator of Beclin1-mediated autophagy during metabolic stress. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2189.
Guo JY, Xia B, White E. Autophagy-mediated tumor promotion. Cell. 2013;155(6):1216–9.
Jiang X, Zhong W, Huang H, et al. Autophagy defects suggested by low levels of autophagy activator MAP1S and high levels of autophagy inhibitor LRPPRC predict poor prognosis of prostate cancer patients. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54(10):1194–204.
Till A, Saito R, Merkurjev D, et al. Evolutionary trends and functional anatomy of the human expanded autophagy network. Autophagy. 2015;11(9):1652–67.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 81472382, 81672550), the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (No: 2014A030313079), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No: 14ykpy19), Guangdong Province Science and Technology for Social Development Project (No: 2013B021800107), Guangdong Province Science and Technology for International Cooperation of Science (No: 2016A050502020)and Guangzhou City 2015 Scientific Research Projects (No: 201510010298) to Hai Huang; and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 81272807) to Zhenghui Guo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This project is a retrospective study and in accordance with ethics review regulations and was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University on December 30, 2015.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Zhenghui Guo, Xianju Chen and Tao Du contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Z., Chen, X., Du, T. et al. Elevated levels of epithelial cell transforming sequence 2 predicts poor prognosis for prostate cancer. Med Oncol 34, 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0872-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0872-3