Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individual-level data on the relationships of progression-free survival and post-progression survival with overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients who received second-line chemotherapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of second-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) might be confounded by subsequent therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the lack of research in this area, we here examined whether progression-free survival (PFS) or post-progression survival (PPS) could serve as valid surrogate endpoints for OS after second-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, using individual-level data. Between April 2009 and June 2011, 39 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who had received second-line chemotherapy following first-line chemotherapy treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed were analysed. The relationships of PFS and PPS with OS were analysed at the individual level. Spearman rank correlation analyses and linear regression analyses showed that PPS was strongly associated with OS (r = 0.90, p < 0.05, R 2 = 0.85), whereas PFS only moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.76, p < 0.05, R 2 = 0.50). Best response at third-line treatment and number of regimens employed after progression beyond second-line chemotherapy were significantly associated with PPS (p < 0.05). Analysis of individual-level data of patients treated with second-line chemotherapy suggested that PPS may be used as a surrogate for OS in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC with unknown oncogenic driver mutations and therefore limited options for subsequent chemotherapy. Moreover, our findings suggest that subsequent treatment after disease progression following second-line chemotherapy may greatly influence OS. However, these results should be validated in further large-scale studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Broglio KR, Berry DA. Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soria JC, Massard C, Le Chevalier T. Should progression-free survival be the primary measure of efficacy for advanced NSCLC therapy? Ann Oncol. 2010;21:2324–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saad ED, Katz A, Buyse M. Overall survival and post-progression survival in advanced breast cancer: a review of recent randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1958–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundar S, Wu J, Hillaby K, Yap J, Lilford R. A systematic review evaluating the relationship between progression free survival and post progression survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrelli F, Barni S. Correlation of progression-free and post-progression survival with overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:186–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hotta K, Fujiwara Y, Takigawa N, et al. Role of survival post-progression in phase III trials of systemic chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi H, Okamoto I, Morita S, Taguri M, Nakagawa K. Postprogression survival for first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1537–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayashi H, Okamoto I, Taguri M, Morita S, Nakagawa K. Postprogression survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who receive second-line or third-line chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Imai H, Takahashi T, Mori K, et al. Individual-level data on the relationships of progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and tumor response with overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasma. 2014;61:233–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scagliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M, et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosmidis P, Mylonakis N, Nicolaides C, et al. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3578–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kortsik C, Albrecht P, Elmer A. Gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective phase II study. Lung Cancer. 2003;40:85–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch FR, Spreafico A, Novello S, Wood MD, Simms L, Papotti M. The prognostic and predictive role of histology in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:1468–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3543–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2354–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1589–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim ES, Hirssh V, Mok T, et al. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1809–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Maemondo M, et al. Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib with carboplatin-paclitaxel for chemo-naive non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR gene mutations (NEJ002). Ann Oncol. 2013;24:54–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson KR, Ringland C, Stokes BJ, et al. Response rate or time to progression as predictors of survival in trials of metastatic colorectal cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:741–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hotta K, Fujiwara Y, Matsuo K, et al. Time to progression as a surrogate marker for overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:311–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weir CJ, Walley RJ. Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Stat Med. 2006;25:183–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fleischer F, Gaschler-Markefski B, Bluhmki E. A statistical model for the dependence between progression-free survival and overall survival. Stat Med. 2009;28:2669–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Foster NR, Qi Y, Shi Q, et al. Tumor response and progression-free survival as potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: findings on the basis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials. Cancer. 2011;117:1262–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berghmans T, Pasleau F, Paesmans M, et al. Surrogate markers predicting overall survival for lung cancer: ELCWP recommendations. Eur Resp J. 2012;39:9–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsujino K, Kawaguchi T, Kubo A, et al. Response rate is associated with prolonged survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:994–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li X, Liu S, Gu H, Wang D. Surrogate end points for survival in the target treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with gefitinib or erlotinib. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:1963–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Ms. Mutsumi Yamazaki, Mr. Taiki Miyauchi, Drs. Kazushige Wakuda, Takuya Oyakawa, Yasushi Hisamatsu, Ryo Koh, Shota Ohmori, and Kazuhisa Nakashima for their assistance in preparing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisao Imai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imai, H., Mori, K., Ono, A. et al. Individual-level data on the relationships of progression-free survival and post-progression survival with overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients who received second-line chemotherapy. Med Oncol 31, 88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0088-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0088-3

Keywords

Navigation