Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Patients: Single Center Experience

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is one of the feared complications of PSC. In our study, we aim to establish the success of brush cytology and CA 19-9 in putting the diagnosis of CCA.

Methods

The data of 30 PSC patients was retrospectively screened whom had brush cytology performed due to dominant strictures. The definitive diagnosis was established by histopathological examination or via radiological/clinic follow-up for at least 12 months.

Results

A total of four patients were excluded from the study. Twenty-six patients diagnosed with PSC, six of which were also diagnosed with CCA, were included in the study. The sensitivity and the specificity of the brush cytology in the diagnosis of CCA in PSC patients were 66.7 and 95 %, respectively. CA 19-9 had high correlation with bilirubin level. The optimal level of CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of CCA was determined to be 138.5 U/ml. Superiority of Ramage scoring over CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of CCA in PSC patients was not established (sensitivity and specificity were 50 %, 94.7 % and 83.3 %, 85 %, respectively).

Conclusion

Brush cytology has moderate sensitivity in differentiating strictures in PSC patients. CA 19-9 has high sensitivity but bilirubin level can affect the CA 19-9. Therefore, advanced techniques and parameters are needed for detecting CCA in PSC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dickson ER, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1984;4(1 Suppl):33S–5S. doi:10.1002/hep.1840040711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiesner RH, Grambsch P, LaRusso NF, Dickson ER. Is primary sclerosing cholangitis a progressive disease or not? Hepatology. 1988;8(4):970–2. doi:10.1002/hep.1840080444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ponsioen CY, Vrouenraets SME, Prawirodirdjo W, et al. Natural history of primary sclerosing cholangitis and prognostic value of cholangiography in a Dutch population. Gut. 2002;51(4):562–6. doi:10.1136/gut.51.4.562.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bambha K, Kim WR, Talwalkar J, et al. Incidence, clinical spectrum, and outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis in a United States community. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(5):1364–9. doi:10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Molodecky NA, Kareemi H, Parab R, et al. Incidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011;53(5):1590–9. doi:10.1002/hep.24247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaram H, Satsangi J, Chapman RW. Increased colorectal neoplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis complicated by primary sclerosing cholangitis: fact or fiction? Gut. 2001;48:430–4. doi:10.1136/gut.48.3.430.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergquist A, Ekbom A, Olsson R, et al. Hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2002;36(3):321–7. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00288-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boberg K, Lind G. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and malignancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25(6):753–64. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2011.10.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(14):924–33. doi:10.1056/NEJM199504063321406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miros M, Kerlin P, Walker N, Harper J, Lynch S, Strong R. Predicting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis before transplantation. Gut. 1991;32(11):1369–73. doi:10.1136/gut.32.11.1369.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nashan B, Schlitt HJ, Tusch G, et al. Biliary malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis: timing for liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1996;23(5):1105–11. doi:10.1002/hep.510230526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Razumilava N, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Cancer surveillance in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2011;54(5):1842–52. doi:10.1002/hep.24570.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsen TH, Vesterhus M, Boberg KM. Review article: controversies in the management of primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(3):282–301. doi:10.1111/apt.12581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton AC, et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(5):1263–73. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01776.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aljiffry M, Renfrew PD, Walsh MJ, Laryea M, Molinari M. Analytical review of diagnosis and treatment strategies for dominant bile duct strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(2):79–90. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00268.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Furmanczyk PS, Grieco VS, Agoff SN. Biliary brush cytology and the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis, evaluation of specific cytomorphologic features and CA19-9 levels. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124(3):355–60. doi:10.1309/J030JYPWKQTHCLNJ.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siqueira E, Schoen RE, Silverman W, Martin J, Rabinovitz M, Weissfeld JL, et al. Detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(1):40–7. doi:10.1067/mge.2002.125105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chalasani N, Baluyut A, Ismail A, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a multicenter case–control study. Hepatology. 2000;31(1):7–11. doi:10.1002/hep.510310103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rabinovitz M, Zajko AB, Hassanein T, et al. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology. 1990;12(4 Pt 1):747–52. doi:10.1002/hep.1840120421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olsson R, Boberg KM, de Muckadell OS, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 5-year multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(5):1464–72. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakeeb A, Lipsett PA, Lillemoe KD, et al. Biliary carcinoembryonic antigen levels are a marker for cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 1996;171(1):147–53. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80090-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel AH, Harnois DM, Klee GG, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ. The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(1):204–7. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01685.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy C, Lymp J, Angulo P, Gores GJ, Larusso N, Lindor KD. The value of serum CA 19-9 in predicting cholangiocarcinomas in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(9):1734–40. doi:10.1007/s10620-005-2927-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Linderg B, Arneio U, Bergquist A, et al. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 2002;34(11):909–16. doi:10.1055/s-2002-35298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Björnsson E, Kilander A, Olsson R. CA 19-9 and CEA are unreliable markers for cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver. 1999;19(6):501–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell SA, Thyssen M, Orchard TR, Jewell DP, Fleming KA, Chapman RW. Cigarette smoking, appendectomy, and tonsillectomy as risk factors for the development of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case control study. Gut. 2002;51(4):567–73. doi:10.1136/gut.51.4.567.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber A, Schmid RM, Prinz C. Diagnostic approaches for cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(26):4131–6. doi:10.3748/wjg.14.4131.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akdogan M, Sasmaz N, Kayhan B, Biyikoğlu I, Dişibeyaz S, Sahin B. Extraordinarily elevated CA19-9 in benign conditions: a case report and review of the literature. Tumori. 2001;87(5):337–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kremer AE, Beuers U. Brushing of bile duct stenoses for the true dignity. Liver Int. 2012;32(5):698–700. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2012.02789.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. LaRusso NF, Shneider BL, Black D, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2006;44(3):746–64. doi:10.1002/hep.21337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Layfield LJ, Wax TD, Lee JG, Cotton PB. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings. Acta Cytol. 1995;39(1):11–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eiholm S, Thielsen P, Kromann-Andersen H. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable. Dan Med J. 2013;60(7):4656.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ramage JK, Donaghy A, Farrant JM, Iorns R, Williams R. Serum tumor markers for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:865–9. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90462-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Enders FB, Halling KC, Lindor KD. Utility of serum tumor markers, imaging, and biliary cytology for detecting cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2008;48(4):1106–17. doi:10.1002/hep.22441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boberg KM, Bergquist A, Mitchell S, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: risk factors and clinical presentation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(10):1205–11. doi:10.1080/003655202760373434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Moff SL, Clark DP, Maitra A, Pandey A, Thuluvath PJ. Utility of bile duct brushings for the early detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(4):336–41. doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000210102.82241.de.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Osnes M, Serck-Hanssen A, Myren J. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(8):829–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahmoudi N, Enns R, Amar J, AlAli J, Lam E, Telford J. Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(4):569–73. doi:10.3748/wjg.14.569.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stewart CJR, Mills PR, Carter R, et al. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54(6):449–55. doi:10.1136/jcp.54.6.449.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Selvaggi SM. Biliary brushing cytology. Cytopathology. 2004;15(2):74–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00133.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Njei B, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Diagnostic yield of bile duct brushings for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(5):783–9. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Koprowski H, Steplewski Z, Mitchell K, Herlyn M, Herlyn D, Fuhrer P. Colorectal carcinoma antigens detected by hybridoma antibodies. Somatic Cell Genet. 1979;5(6):957–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nichols JC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH, Nagorney DM, Ritts RE. Predicting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: an analysis of the serological marker CA 19-9. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(9):874–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Boberg KM, Jebsen P, Clausen OP, Foss A, Aabakken L, Schrumpf E. Diagnostic benefit of biliary brush cytology in cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2006;45(4):568–74. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hultcrantz R, Olsson R, Danielsson A, et al. A 3-year prospective study on serum tumor markers used for detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 1999;30(4):669–73. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80198-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Halme L, Arola J, Numminen K, Krogerus L, Mäkisalo H, Färkkilä M. Biliary dysplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: additional value of DNA ploidity. Liver Int. 2012;32(5):783–9. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02672.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ponsioen CY, Vrouenraets SM, van Milligen de Wit AW, et al. Value of brush cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 1999;31(4):305–9. doi:10.1055/s-1999-18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ufuk Barış Kuzu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuzu, U.B., Ödemiş, B., Suna, N. et al. The Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Patients: Single Center Experience. J Gastrointest Canc 47, 8–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-015-9777-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-015-9777-1

Keywords

Navigation