Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic criteria for cutaneous injuries in child abuse: classification, findings, and interpretation

  • Review
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical abuse of children has many manifestations. Depending on the type of force involved, specific injury patterns are produced on the body of the child, the morphology and localization of which are forensically relevant in terms of diagnostic classification as child abuse. Typical patterned bruising includes, for example, tramline bruises resulting from blows with oblong, stick-like objects. In addition to rounded or one-sided horseshoe-shaped bite injuries, injuries of different ages, clustered injuries (e.g., three or more individual injuries in the same body region), and thermal injuries are typical results of abuse. Abusive scalds are usually characterized by a symmetrical impression and localization with sharp delineation of the scald wound edges, in contrast to accidental scalding injuries with radiating splash patterns ending in tapered points. The coloration of a hematoma can help indicate the time when the injury occurred. Lack of a coherent and comprehensible explanation for accidental injury constitutes grounds for suspecting abuse. Suspicions should be raised in cases of a delayed visit to a doctor, waiting for an unusually long period before summoning emergency medical help for serious injuries to a child, and when differing versions of a purported accident are provided. Documentation of the findings is highly relevant in later reviews of the diagnosis, for instance, when new relevant facts and investigative results come to light in subsequent criminal proceedings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swerdlin A, Berkowitz C, Craft N. Cutaneous signs of child abuse. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:371–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Balaban R, Stanger V, Haruvi R, Zur S, Augarten A. Suspected child abuse and neglect: assessment in a hospital setting. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:617–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Aldridge S, O’Flynn J, Lorenz DJ. Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics. 2010;125:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugar NF, Taylor JA, Feldman KW. Bruises in infants and toddlers: those who don’t cruise rarely bruise. Puget Sound Pediatric Research Network. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:399–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vale GL. Dentistry, bite marks and the investigation of crime. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1996;24:29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman AJ, Senn DR, Arendt DM. Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1436–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Reality bites—A ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;216:82–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nuzzolese E, Di Vella G. The development of a colorimetric scale as a visual aid for the bruise age determination of bite marks and blunt trauma. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocher MS, Kasser JR. Orthopaedic aspects of child abuse. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:10–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maguire S, Mann MK, Sibert J, Kemp A. Are there patterns of bruising in childhood which are diagnostic or suggestive of abuse? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:182–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oehmichen M, Gerling I, Meissner C. Petechiae of the baby’s skin as differentiation symptom of infanticide versus SIDS. J Forensic Sci. 2000;45:602–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bohnert M, Grosse Perdekamp M, Pollak S. Three subsequent infanticides covered up as SIDS. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119:31–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker AM. Pediatric asphyxial deaths. In: Collins KA, Byard RW, editors. Forensic pathology of infancy and childhood. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 207–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis P. Cutaneous findings in children. In: Collins KA, Byard RW, editors. Forensic pathology of infancy and childhood. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 243–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Faller-Marquardt M, Pollak S, Schmidt U. Cigarette burns in forensic medicine. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;176:200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oranje A, Bilo RA. Skin signs in child abuse and differential diagnosis. Minerva Pediatr. 2011;63:319–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carpenter RF. The prevalence and distribution of bruising in babies. Arch Dis Child. 1999;80:363–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jayakumar P, Barry M, Ramachandran M. Orthopaedic aspects of paediatric non-accidental injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li YMM, Wells D. Skin conditions mimicking pediatric inflicted injury. In: Collins KA, Byard RW, editors. Forensic pathology of infancy and childhood. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 267–89.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Melville JD, Lukefahr JL, Cornell J, Kellogg ND, Lancaster JL. The effect of image quality on the assessment of child abuse photographs. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:607–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Tsokos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsokos, M. Diagnostic criteria for cutaneous injuries in child abuse: classification, findings, and interpretation. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11, 235–242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9671-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9671-y

Keywords

Navigation