Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical implication of fasting and post-challenged plasma glucose in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is the preferred test in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) to 2-h post-challenged plasma glucose (2hPG). There is little information available on the comparison between FPG and 2hPG diagnostic criteria. This study included adult participants (≥18 years old) of the NHANES 2005–2010 with FPG, 2hPG, and BMI measured. Subjects with established DM were excluded. The sensitivity of FPG and 2hPG diagnostic criteria was compared as the main outcome measure. Among 5,782 subjects, 476 subjects (8.23 %) were diagnosed with DM by either FPG, 2hPG, or both criteria. Among the subjects meeting the criterion of FPG, those with 2hPG <200 mg/dL were younger (57 ± 16 vs. 61 ± 15 years old, P < 0.05, mean ± STD) and less obese (30.81 ± 7.89 vs. 32.71 ± 6.68 kg/m2, P < 0.05) as compared to those with 2hPG ≥200 mg/dL. Among the subjects meeting the criterion of 2hPG, those with FPG <126 mg/dL were more female (55.41 vs. 39.88 %, P < 0.0002), less obese (29.24 ± 5.83 vs. 32.71 ± 6.68 kg/m2, P < 0.000001), lower diastolic blood pressure (67 ± 12 vs. 71 ± 14 mmHg, P < 0.02), and less family history of DM (36.35 vs. 48.47 %, P < 0.02) as compared to those with FPG ≥126 mg/dL. The sensitivity of diagnosis of DM was only 41.37 % for FPG criterion, while it was 66.53 % for 2hPG criterion. Thus, compared to 2hPG criterion, FPG criterion had a lower sensitivity detecting new cases of DM. The use of FPG criterion would more likely result in underdiagnosing DM, especially in female and less obese subjects, as compared to the use of 2hPG criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

2hPG:

2-h post-challenged plasma glucose

OGTT:

Oral glucose tolerance test

NHANES:

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BMI:

Body mass index

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

IFG:

Isolated impaired fasting glucose

IGT:

Isolated impaired glucose tolerance

References

  1. National Diabetes Statistics, 2011. 4-19-2013. http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/

  2. S. Wild, G. Roglic, A. Green, R. Sicree, H. King, Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27, 1047–1053 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M.I. Harris, R. Klein, T.A. Welborn, M.W. Knuiman, Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4–7 year before clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care 15, 815–819 (1992)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. T.J. Thompson, M.M. Engelgau, M. Hegazy, M.A. Ali, E.S. Sous, A. Badran, W.H. Herman, The onset of NIDDM and its relationship to clinical diagnosis in Egyptian adults. Diabet. Med. 13, 337–340 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabet. Med. 24, 137–144 (2007)

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. T.T. Nguyen, J.J. Wang, T.Y. Wong, Retinal vascular changes in pre-diabetes and prehypertension: new findings and their research and clinical implications. Diabetes Care 30, 2708–2715 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. C.J. Sumner, S. Sheth, J.W. Griffin, D.R. Cornblath, M. Polydefkis, The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Neurology 60, 108–111 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R.R. Holman, S.K. Paul, M.A. Bethel, D.R. Matthews, H.A. Neil, 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1577–1589 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes 28, 1039–1057 (1979)

  10. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 20, 1183–1197 (1997)

  11. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 32, 1327–1334 (2009)

  12. T. Nakagami, M. Tominaga, R. Nishimura, N. Yoshiike, M. Daimon, T. Oizumi, N. Tajima, Is the measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c alone an efficient screening test for undiagnosed diabetes? Japan National Diabetes Survey. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 76, 251–256 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C.M. Bennett, M. Guo, S.C. Dharmage, HbA(1c) as a screening tool for detection of Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet. Med. 24, 333–343 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Buell, D. Kermah, M.B. Davidson, Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999–2004 NHANES population. Diabetes Care 30, 2233–2235 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. C.L. Rohlfing, H.M. Wiedmeyer, R.R. Little, J.D. England, A. Tennill, D.E. Goldstein, Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA(1c): analysis of glucose profiles and HbA(1c) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 25, 275–278 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R.C. Perry, R.R. Shankar, N. Fineberg, J. McGill, A.D. Baron, HbA1c measurement improves the detection of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with nondiagnostic levels of fasting plasma glucose: the Early Diabetes Intervention Program (EDIP). Diabetes Care 24, 465–471 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Eng. ROC analysis: web-based calculator for ROC curves. 2-2-0013. http://www.rad.jhmi.edu/jeng/javarad/roc/JROCFITi.html

  18. K.C. Chiu, D.S. Martinez, A. Chu, Comparison of the relationship of age and beta cell function in three ethnic groups. Clin. Endocrinol. 62, 296–302 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Weyer, C. Bogardus, R.E. Pratley, Metabolic characteristics of individuals with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 48, 2197–2203 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Festa, R. D’Agostino Jr, A.J. Hanley, A.J. Karter, M.F. Saad, S.M. Haffner, Differences in insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects with isolated impaired glucose tolerance or isolated impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes 53, 1549–1555 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Meyer, W. Pimenta, H.J. Woerle, H.T. Van, E. Szoke, A. Mitrakou, J. Gerich, Different mechanisms for impaired fasting glucose and impaired postprandial glucose tolerance in humans. Diabetes Care 29, 1909–1914 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Basu, C. Barosa, J. Jones, S. Dube, R. Carter, A. Basu, R.A. Rizza, Pathogenesis of prediabetes: role of the liver in isolated fasting hyperglycemia and combined fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98, E409–E417 (2013)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Bergman, R. Dankner, J. Roth, K.M. Narayan, Are current diagnostic guidelines delaying early detection of dysglycemic states? Time for new approaches. Endocrine 44, 66–69 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Barzilai, D.M. Huffman, R.H. Muzumdar, A. Bartke, The critical role of metabolic pathways in aging. Diabetes 61, 1315–1322 (2012)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Selvin, C.M. Crainiceanu, F.L. Brancati, J. Coresh, Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes. Arch. Intern. Med. 167, 1545–1551 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. A.M. Chang, J.B. Halter, Aging and insulin secretion. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 284, E7–E12 (2003)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are in debt to Karen Ramos for excellent logistic and administrative support of this research endeavor.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ken C. Chiu or Wei Feng.

Additional information

Ken C. Chiu and Wei Feng contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Ou, HY., Karnchanasorn, R. et al. Clinical implication of fasting and post-challenged plasma glucose in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Endocrine 48, 511–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0301-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0301-3

Keywords

Navigation