Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of probabilistic multi-objective optimization in material milling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, it takes the material milling as an example to illuminate the application of probabilistic multi-objective optimization (PMOO) in material processing. The multi-objective optimization problem is seen as the integral optimization of a system. It adopts the method of probability theory to deal with the issue of multi-objective optimization problem in a system, a new concept of “preferable probability” is introduced, and the objectives (attributes) of candidate scheme in the optimization are preliminarily divided into two basic types, i.e., beneficial attribute and unbeneficial attribute, and a quantitative evaluation method of partial preferable probability corresponding to the type of attribute whether beneficial or unbeneficial is established. Moreover, the total preferable probability of each scheme is the product of entire partial preferable probabilities of all possible attributes of the candidate objective in the spirit of probability theory. The total preferable probability of each scheme is the unique and decisive indicator of the candidate scheme to win the competition in this optimization. As an application in material processing, the material milling is taken as example, orthogonal (Taguchi) design with twenty-seven experiments is employed, in which the number of insert, cutting piece materials and tool tip radius, cutting speed, feed speed and cutting depth are taken as input variables; Minimizing surface roughness (SR) and maximizing material removal rate (MRR) of the workpiece are taken as the target responses simultaneously. Finally, the optimum status corresponding to the highest total preferable probability is obtained in viewpoint of system theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be available on proper requirement.

References

  1. Le, H.K.: Multi-criteria decision making in the milling process using the PARIS Method, Eng., Techn. Appl. Sci Res. 12, 9208–9216 (2022)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trung, D.D.: Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV methods for Multi-criteria decision making in milling process, Strojnicky Casopis -. J. Mech. Eng. 71(2), 69–84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2021-0019

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Le, T.H., Pham, V.B., Hoang, T.D.: Appl. Sci. Res. 12(1), 8023–8028 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4594 Surface Finish Comparison of Dry and Coolant Fluid High-Speed Milling of JIS SDK61 Mould Steel, Engineering, Technology &

  4. Nguyen, V.C., Nguyen, T.D., Tien, D.H.: Cutting Parameter Optimization in Finishing Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy under MQL Condition using TOPSIS and, Analysis, A.N.O.V.A.: Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 11(1), 6775–6780 (2021). https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4015

  5. Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., Wardoyo, R.: Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM). Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A.: Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektr Ir. Elektrotech. 122, 3–6 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y.: A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20, 889–899 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.-H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brauers, W.: Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society. A Revolution in Economic Thinking by multi-objective Optimization. Springer, Kluwer (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Springer _ Science + Busines Media (2020)

  11. Mufazzal, S., Muzakkir, S.M.: A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals. Comput. Ind. Eng. 119, 1–38 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maniya, K., Bhatt, M.G.: A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Mater. Des. 31, 1785–1789 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng, M., Yu, J., Teng, H., Cui, Y., Wang, Y.: Probability-Based Multi-objective Optimization for Material Selection, 2nd edn. Springer, Singapore (2023)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng, M., Yu, J.: Utilization of probability-based multi-objective optimization in material welding and machining. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM). (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01478-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

    Maosheng Zheng

  2. School of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

    Jie Yu

Authors
  1. Maosheng Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maosheng Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, M., Yu, J. Application of probabilistic multi-objective optimization in material milling. Int J Interact Des Manuf 18, 1053–1057 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01643-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01643-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation