Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative analysis of energy efficient routing protocols with optimization in WSN

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In various industries such as industry, automation, health, military etc., Wireless Sensor Network (WSN's) has been developed. But, WSNs have limitations of energy efficiency, routing, security, and quality of services. In order to boost the network life, increase power efficiency and resolve the problems of fault tolerance in wireless sensor networks, we reviewed numerous literature surveys concerning energy optimize routing protocols. Based on the studies, we have considered three objectives like implementation of Intra Mobile Agents (IN-MA) based particle swarm optimization with genetic algorithm (PSO-GA), FTOR-ModPSO or Fault tolerance and optimal relay node with modified Particle Swarm Optimization, and fuzzy optimal clustering method. The objectives achieve lower consumption of electricity, increase packet delivery rates and assess SINK's optimal location in a wireless sensor system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanenbaum, A. S., Van Steen, M.: Distributed System Principles and Paradigm, second edition. (2006)

  2. Enami, N., Askari Moghadam, R., Haghighat, A.T.: A survey on application of neural networks in energy conservation of wireless sensor networks. In: WiMo 2010, CCIS 84, pp. 283–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mendes, L.D., Rodrigues, J.J.: A survey on cross-layer solutions for wireless sensor networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 34(2), 523–534 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aswale, S., Ghorpade, V.R.: Survey of QoS routing protocols in wireless multimedia sensor networks. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2015, 1–29 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamid, Z., Hussain, F.B.: QoS in wireless multimedia sensor networks: A layered and cross-layered approach. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 75(1), 729–757 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gungor, V.C., Hancke, G.P.: Industrial wireless sensor networks: Challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 56(10), 4258–4265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao, Y., Leeson, M.S., Higgins, M.D.: Flexible quality of service model for wireless body area sensor networks. Healthc. Technol. Lett. 3(1), 12–15 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalid, M., Ullah, Z., Ahmad, N., Arshad, M., Jan, B., Cao, Y., Adnan, A.: A survey of routing issues and associated protocols in underwater wireless sensor networks. J. Sens. 2017, 1–17 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Munir, S. A., Ren, B., Jiao, W., Wang, B., Xie, D., Ma, J.: Mobile wireless sensor network: Architecture and enabling technologies for ubiquitous computing. In 21st IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, AINAW’07. vol. 2, pp. 113–120, (2007)

  10. Xu, Y., Qi, H., & Kuruganti, P. T.: Distributed computing paradigm for collaborative processing in sensor networks. In IEEE GlobeCom. pp. 3531–3535, (2003)

  11. Xu, Y., Qi, H.: Distributed computing paradigm for collaborative signal and information processing in sensor networks. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 64(8), 945–959 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qi, H., Xu, Y., Wang, X.: Mobile-agent-based collaborative signal and information processing in sensor networks. Proc. IEEE 91(8), 1172–1183 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, M., Kwon, T., Yuan, Y., Leung, V.C.M.: Mobile agent based wireless sensor networks. J. Comput. 1, 6–10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, Y., Qi, H.: Mobile agent migration modelling and design for target tracking in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. J. 6(1), 1–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biswas, P.K., Qi, H., Xu, Y.: Mobile agent based collaborative sensor fusion. Inf. Fus. J. 9(3), 399–411 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Younus, M.U.: Analysis of the impact of different parameter settings on wireless sensor network lifetime. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl 9, 16–21 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jain, A., Goel, A.K.: Energy-efficient fuzzy routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Personal Commun. 110(3), 1459–1474 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Benaddy, M., El Habil, B., El Ouali, M., El Meslouhi, O., Krit, S.: A multipath routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks under distance and energy consumption constraints for reliable data transmission. In 2017 International Conference on Engineering and MIS (ICEMIS), pp. 1–4. IEEE, (2017)

  19. Sun, Y., Dong, W., Chen, Y.: An improved routing algorithm based on ant colony optimization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 21(6), 1317–1320 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rishiwal, V., Yadav, M., Kumar, S.: Energy consumption pattern and scalability of routing protocols for heterogeneous MANETs. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Distrib. Syst. 18(1), 83–109 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mahadevaswamy, U. B.: Energy-efficient routing in wireless sensor network based on mobile sink guided by stochastic hill climbing. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (2088–8708) 10(6) (2020)

  22. Minbashi, A., Vahidi, M.: A new hybrid algorithm for determining the optimal number of clusters based on ICA, Hill Climbing and K-means algorithms to prolong WSN lifetime

  23. Hu, W., Chen, Y., Yang, J., Shen, X.: Mobile nodes localisation based on hill-climbing optimisation. Int. J. Wirel. Mobile Comput. 11(1), 18–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu, S., Li, G.: TMSE: A topology modification strategy to enhance the robustness of scale-free wireless sensor networks. Comput. Commun. (2020)

  25. Fu, X., Pace, P., Aloi, G., Yang, L., Fortino, G.: Topology optimization against cascading failures on wireless sensor networks using a memetic algorithm. Comput. Netw. p. 107327 (2020)

  26. Mehmood, A., Lv, Z., Lloret, J., Umar, M.M.: ELDC: an artificial neural network based energy-efficient and robust routing scheme for pollution monitoring in WSNs. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 8(1), 106–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2671847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gherbi, C., Aliouat, Z., Benmohammed, M.: Distributed energy-efficient adaptive clustering protocol with data gathering for large scale wireless sensor networks. In: 2015 12th International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS), Algiers, pp. 1–7 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPS.2015.7244966

  28. Mohajerani, A., Gharavian, D.: An ant colony optimization-based routing algorithm for extending network lifetime in wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 22(8), 2637–2647 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lohani, D., Varma, S.: Energy efficient data aggregation in mobile agent based wireless sensor network. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 89(4), 1165–1176 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kong, L., Pan, J.-S., Snášel, V., Tsai, P.-W., Sung, T.-W.: An energy-aware routing protocol for wireless sensor network based on genetic algorithm. Telecommun. Syst. 67(3), 451–463 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaswan, A., Singh, V., Jana, P.K.: A multi-objective and PSO based energy efficient path design for mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 46, 122–136 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Basha, A.R.: Energy efficient aggregation technique-based realisable secure aware routing protocol for wireless sensor network. IET Wirel. Sens. Syst. 10(4), 166–174 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dwivedi, A.K., Sharma, A.K., Mehra, P.S.: Energy-aware routing protocols for wireless sensor network based on fuzzy logic: a 10-years analytical (2020)

  34. Gandhi, G.S., Vikas, K., Ratnam, V., Babu, K.S.: Grid clustering and fuzzy reinforcement-learning based energy-efficient data aggregation scheme for distributed WSN. IET Commun. 14(16), 2840–2848 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sridhar, R., Guruprasad, N.: Energy efficient chaotic whale optimization technique for data gathering in wireless sensor network. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 10(4), 4176 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chaudhary S., Kumar U., Gambhir S.: Energy-efficient and secured mobile agent itinerary approach in wireless sensor network. In: Favorskaya, M., Mekhilef, S., Pandey, R., Singh, N. (eds) Innovations in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 661. Springer, Singapore (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4692-1_53

  37. Al-Sodairi, S., Ouni, R.: Reliable and energy-efficient multi-hop LEACH-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sustain. Comput. Inf. Syst. 20, 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rathee, M., Kumar, S., Gandomi, A.H., Dilip, K., Balusamy, B., Patan, R.: Ant colony optimization based quality of service aware energy balancing secure routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 68(1), 170–182 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh, P., Singh, R.: Energy-efficient QoS-aware intelligent hybrid clustered routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. J. Sens. 2019 (2019)

  40. Robinson, Y., Harold, E., Julie, G., Kumar, R.: Probability-based cluster head selection and fuzzy multipath routing for prolonging lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 12(5), 1061–1075 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lipare, A., Edla, D.R., Kuppili, V.: Energy-efficient load balancing approach for avoiding energy hole problem in WSN using grey wolf optimizer with novel fitness function. Appl. Soft Comput. 84, 105706 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, Z., Ding, H., Li, Bo., Bao, L., Yang, Z.: An energy-efficient routing protocol based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 8, 133577–133596 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Verma, S., Sood, N., Sharma, A.K.: Genetic algorithm-based optimized cluster head selection for single and multiple data sinks in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Appl. Soft Comput. 85, 105788 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mehta, D., Saxena, S.: MCH-EOR: Multi-objective cluster head based energy-aware optimized routing algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Sustain. Comput. Inf. Syst. 28, 100406 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guleria, K., Verma, A.K.: Meta-heuristic ant colony optimization based unequal clustering for wireless sensor network. Wirel. Personal Commun. 105(3), 891–911 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Daneshvar, S.M., Mahdi, H., Mohajer, P.A.A., Mazinani, S.M.: Energy-efficient routing in WSN: a centralized cluster-based approach via grey wolf optimizer. IEEE Access 7, 170019–170031 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sharma, R., Vashisht, V., Singh, U.: EEFCM-DE: energy-efficient clustering based on fuzzy C means and differential evolution algorithm in WSNs. IET Commun. 13(8), 996–1007 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Arthi, K., Lochana, A.S.R.: Zone-based dual sub sink for network lifetime maximization in wireless sensor network. Clust. Comput. 22(6), 15273–15283 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Farsi, M., Badawy, M., Moustafa, M., Ali, H.A., Abdulazeem, Y.: A congestion-aware clustering and routing (CCR) protocol for mitigating congestion in WSN. IEEE Access 7, 105402–105419 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Murugaanandam, S., Ganapathy, V.: Reliability-based cluster head selection methodology using fuzzy logic for performance improvement in WSNs. IEEE Access 7, 87357–87368 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lata, S., Mehfuz, S., Urooj, S., Alrowais, F.: Fuzzy clustering algorithm for enhancing reliability and network lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 8, 66013–66024 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

    Pogula Sreedevi & S. Venkateswarlu

Authors
  1. Pogula Sreedevi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Venkateswarlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pogula Sreedevi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sreedevi, P., Venkateswarlu, S. Comparative analysis of energy efficient routing protocols with optimization in WSN. Int J Interact Des Manuf (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00958-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00958-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation