Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Improving education in developing countries using robotic platforms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In developing countries, educational programs have been using an out of date teaching methodology, where students’ only work is to listen to the professors’ lessons without having practical applications or hands-on experience, thereby provoking a decrease in student attention span, motivation, and boredom with learning processes. This work proposes the use of robotic platforms inside elementary schools and universities to improve and evaluate the usability and effectiveness of robots on students’ attention spans, motivation, and knowledge acquirement during their classes. This work mentions a case of study in Mexico where the use of the robotic platforms was evaluated. To evaluate the learning process of undergraduate students, a hexapod robot was used throughout a basic programming course to help the students learn about robotics programming and path planning algorithms. At the end of the course, several surveys were given to the students to evaluate their perceptions about the course and the use of the robotic platform. In the elementary school, a NAO Robot was used to give students four different diligences in physics, mathematics and physical education classes. During these experimentations, the attention span of the students and their ability to use the robotic platforms were observed, using a behavior observation protocol; also, their knowledge acquisition before and after class was evaluated. The results showed that the use of a robotic platform in class helps the students improve their knowledge acquisition and increases their motivation and attention span. Also, the surveys and usability analysis demonstrate that the design of the diligences and course projects were sufficient to generate greater interest among the students in the topics taught in school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peterson, G.D., Prados, J.W.: Vision for change, a summary report of the abet. In: NSF/Industry Workshops (1995)

  2. Boeing Company. Desired attributes of an engineer (2009)

  3. US National Academy of Engineering: The engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spolaôr, N., Benitti, F.B.V.: Robotics applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 112, 97–107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, D., Hegab, H., Nelson, J.:. Living WITH the Lab-a freshman curriculum to boost hands-on learning, student confidence and innovation. In: 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. S3G-8. IEEE (2008)

  7. Plaza, P., Sancristobal, E., Fernandez, G., Castro, M., Pérez, C.: Collaborative robotic educational tool based on programmable logic and Arduino. In 2016 Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching (TAEE), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2016)

  8. Ruiz-del-Solar, J., Avilés, R.: Robotics courses for children as a motivation tool: the Chilean experience. IEEE Trans. Educ. 47(4), 474–480 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Howley, I., Hayashi, K., Hagita, N.: Can a social robot stimulate science curiosity in classrooms? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(5), 641–652 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., Senft, E., Belpaeme, T.: Heart vs hard drive: children learn more from a human tutor than a social robot. In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 451–452. IEEE Press (2016)

  11. Brown, L., Kerwin, R., Howard, A.M.: Applying behavioral strategies for student engagement using a robotic educational agent. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 4360–4365. IEEE (2013)

  12. Ko, W., Han, J., Ji, S., Nam, K., Lee, S., Shon, W.: Development of task planner for u-intelligent educational robots. In: ICCAS-SICE, 2009, pp. 5699–5702. IEEE (2009)

  13. Choset, H.M.: Principles of robot motion: theory, algorithms, and implementation. MIT press, Cambridge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Calidad de la educaci6n en mexico, de las más bajas en el mundo: Wef. 2015

  15. Sternberg, R.J., Mio, J., Salinas, E.O., Ponce, L.R., Rodriguez, E.:. Psicologia cognoscitiua. Cengage Learning (2011)

  16. Resultados Historicos Nacionales 2006–2013 (2013)

  17. Encuesta sobre la Percepci6n Publica de la Ciencia y la Tecnologia (ENPECYT) 2013 (2013)

  18. Bravo Sanchez, F.A., Forero Guzman, A.: La robótica como un recurso para facilitar el aprendizaje y desarrollo de competencias generales. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información 13(2), 120–136 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wadsworth, B.J.: Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishing, Harlow (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ROBO-ED. Robótica educativa de México s.a. de c.v. (2017)

  21. Acuna, A.L.: Robótica y aprendizaje por diseno. Technical report, e-libro, Corp. (2009)

  22. Tecnologico de Monterrey. Tec21 educational model (2018)

  23. Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barker, B.S., Ansorge, J.: Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 39(3), 229–243 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain, S., Lindh, J., Shukur, G.: The effect of Lego training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish data. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(3), 182–194 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lindh, J., Holgersson, T.: Does lego training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems? Comput. Educ. 49(4), 1097–1111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M., Soto, A.: An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Auton. Robots 25(4), 367–382 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N.: The effect of 4-h robotics and geospatial technologies on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and attitudes. In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 447–452. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2008)

  29. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., Adamchuk, V.: The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming. In: 39th IEEE of Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009. FIE’09, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2009)

  30. Sullivan, F.R.: Robotics and science literacy: thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach. 45(3), 373–394 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whittier, L.E., Robinson, M.: Teaching evolution to non-english profficient students by using lego robotics, pp. 19–28. American Secondary Education (2007)

  32. Williams, D.C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M.J., Lai, G.: Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 40(2), 201–216 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lenskiy, A., Junho, H., Dongyun, K., Junsu, P.: Educational platform for learning programming via controlling mobile robots. In: 2014 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICODSE), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2014)

  34. Thomaz, S., Aglaé, A., Fernandes, C., Pitta, R., Azevedo, S., Burlamaqui, A., Silva, A. and Gonçalves, L.M.:. Roboeduc: a pedagogical tool to support educational robotics (2009)

  35. Borrego, M., Froyd, J.E., Hall, T.S.: Diffusion of engineering education innovations: a survey of awareness and adoption rates in us engineering departments. J. Eng. Educ. 99(3), 185–207 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K-Team Corp. K-team (2007)

  37. Araújo, A., Portugal, D., Couceiro, M.S., Rocha, R.P.: Integrating arduino-based educational mobile robots in ROS. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 77(2), 281–298 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Maas, R., Maehle, E.: An easy to use framework for educational robots. In Proceedings of 7th German Conference on Robotics, ROBOTIK 2012, pp. 1–5. VDE (2012)

  39. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P., Canny, J.F., Malik, J.M., Edwards, D.D.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, vol. 2. Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Latombe, J.-C.: Robot Motion Planning, vol. 124. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aldebaran Robotics. Robot nao (2017)

  42. Moyao, C.H.: Sistema de aprendizaje integral para niños de primaria. PhD thesis, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (2013)

  43. Cambell, D., Cook, T: Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales. In: HM Dunnette: Handbook of Organization and Industrial Psychology, Rand McNally (1976)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was made with the collaboration of Gerardo Ivan Moyers Barrera, graduate engineering student of Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City Campus. We also acknowledge the financial and technical support of Writing Lab, TecLabs and Tecnologico de Monterrey in the production of this work. Finally, we are grateful for the collaboration with the Psychology Faculty of UNAM for making this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, Mexico

    Pedro Ponce, Arturo Molina, Edgar Omar Lopez Caudana & German Baltazar Reyes

  2. Universidad Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

    Nancy Mazon Parra

Authors
  1. Pedro Ponce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arturo Molina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edgar Omar Lopez Caudana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. German Baltazar Reyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nancy Mazon Parra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to German Baltazar Reyes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ponce, P., Molina, A., Caudana, E.O.L. et al. Improving education in developing countries using robotic platforms. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13, 1401–1422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00576-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00576-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation