Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Federica’s MOOC’ (Massive Open Online Course): a blended course in engineering drawing at Federico II

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The key findings about the use of a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) at University of Naples Federico II are shown. In particular, the Engineering Drawing course for Industrial Engineering students was the pilot to evaluate the benefits of new Web-Based Platforms and Environments in higher education. The combination of In-Class and On-Line lessons is defined “Blended Course” and can be attended by students both in traditional classrooms and On-Line. It was provided during the last four academic years allowing the use of new tools (e.g., multimedia contents, interactive files). Thanks to about 7000 students involved in this project, several data were gathered for statistics and analysis purposes. Therefore, the access to the MOOC was monitored and the correlation with the homework was examined. At the end of the course, the level of satisfaction of the students about the interaction with the new platform was evaluated. The analysis of the results provided useful hints for the updating of the course in order to improve skills and interactive experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See the Report: https://www.class-central.com/report/best-free-online-courses-2017/.

  2. A bounce is a single page session on a specified site. In Analytics, a bounce is specifically calculated as a session that triggers a single request to the Analytics server, for example when a user opens a single page on the site and exits without triggering other requests to the Analytics server during the session.

  3. Data provided by google analytics.

  4. Regarding the high dropout rates, Coursera, edX and other MOOC providers are proposing MOOC clusters that contain various mini MOOCs that can offer the same knowledge as a traditional MOOC but presenting content in a different way and tighter times for each cluster.

References

  1. Fábregas, J., Hernández-Abad, F., Hernández-Abad, V., Rojas Sola, J.I.: Comparative analysis of a university learning experience: classroom mode versus distance mode. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 9, 145–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0205-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L Rai, D Chunrao (2016) Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 6(4), 262–268. ISSN: 2010-3689. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.697

  3. Lanzotti,A., Patalano, S., Trotta, M.: Teaching product design through a participatory contest experience. In: Proceedings of ETRIA World TRIZ Future Conference 2010, pp. 1–7, 3–5 November Bergamo, Italy (2010)

  4. Wang, Y., Ma, J., Kremer, G.E., Jackson, K.L.: An investigation of effectiveness differences between in-class and online learning: an Engineering Drawing Case Study. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0510-8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., Orellana, A.: Distance education research: a review of the literature. J. Comput. High. Educ. 23(2–3), 124–142 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swan, K.: Learning effectiveness online: what the research tells us. In: Bourne, J., Moore, J.C. (eds.) Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction, vol. 4, pp. 13–45. Sloan Center for Online Education, Needham (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ceylan, V.K., Elitok Kesici, A.: Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. J. Hum. Sci. 14(1), 308–320 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shivam, R., Singh, S.: Implementation of Blended Learning in Classroom: A review paper. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 5(11) (2015). ISSN 2250-3153

  9. Bensona, V., Andersona, D., Ooms, A.: Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: blended learning in business and management education. Res. Learn. Technol. 19(2), 143–154 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blumenstyk, G.: American Higher Education in Crisis? What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press (2015). ISBN-13: 978-0199374083

  11. Gaebel, M.: MOOCs Massive Open Online Courses—an update of EUA’s first paper. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the European University EUA Brussels, Belgium, EUA Occasional Papers, January 2014

  12. Luján-Mora, S., Saquete, E.: Mixing a MOOC with flip teaching in a traditional classroom. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN 2013), pp. 6480–6487, Barcelona (Spain), July 1–3, 2013. ISBN: 978-84-616-3822-2

  13. Galilei, G.: Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze attinenti la meccanica e i movimenti locali. Published in Italian and Latin at Leida (Netherlands) by the Elzevir family in 1638

  14. Lanzotti, A.: Engineering Drawing Course: Engineering of a device designed by Diabolik (n. 24, 24/11/1975) (2016). Source On-Line on www.Federica.eu

  15. Lanzotti, A., Patalano, S.: Adjustable Wheelchair Seat for Disabled People. Italian National Patent n. NA2013U000008, 2013

  16. Patalano, S., Galileo, F., Matrone, G., Lanzotti, A.: Participatory design and virtual prototyping for postural seat system innovation. In: CD-ROM Proceedings of Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering 2010, Ancona, Italy (2010)

  17. Lanzotti, A., Patalano, S., Podda, G.: Quotatura funzionale e quotatura secondo ASME: situazione attuale e prospettive. Capitolo XII in Vol. Acotacion Functiónal, Ed. INGEGRAF, ISBN 84-95809-03-6, pp. 237–253 (2001)

  18. Lanzotti, A., Martorelli, M., Staiano, G.: Understanding process parameter effects of reprap open-source three-dimensional printers through a design of experiments approach. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME 137(1), 011017 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patalano,S., Lanzotti, A., Vitolo, F., Gerbino S.: On the usability assessment of the graphical user interface related to a digital pattern software tool. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0287-y. ISSN: 1955-2513

  20. Gerbino, S., Del Giudice, D.M., Staiano, G., Lanzotti, A., Martorelli, M.: On the influence of scanning factors on the laser scanner-based 3D inspection process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84(9–12), 1787–1799 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Nevo, A., et al.: WCLL breeding blanket design and integration for DEMO 2015: status and perspectives. Fusion Eng. Des. 124, 682–686 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Gironimo, G., Marzullo, D., Mozzillo, R., Tarallo, A., Villone, F.: The DTT device: first wall, vessel and cryostat structures. Fusion Eng. Des. 122, 333–340 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patalano, S., Vitolo, F., Lanzotti, A.: Automotive power window system design: object-oriented modelling and design of experiments integration within a digital pattern approach. Mech. Ind. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2015104

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vitolo, F., Patalano, S., Lanzotti, A., Timpone, F., De Martino, M.: Window shape effect in a single bowden power window system. In: 2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/syseng.2017.8088308

  25. Renno, F., Papa, S.: Direct modeling approach to improve virtual prototyping and FEM analyses of bicycle frames. Eng. Lett. 23(4), 333–341 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lanzotti, A., Carbone, F., Grazioso, S., Renno, F.: Staiano M A new interactive design approach for concept selection based on expert opinion. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0482-8

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lanzotti, A., Di Gironimo, G., Papa, S., Renno, F., Tarallo, A., D’Angelo, R.: On the usability of augmented reality devices for interactive risk assessment. Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng. 8, 132–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V8-N1-132-138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Crescenzi, F., et al.: Vessel and in-vessel components design upgrade of the FAST machine. Fusion Eng. Des. 88(9–10), 2048–2051 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramogida, G., et al.: Active toroidal field ripple compensation and MHD feedback control coils in FAST. Fusion Eng. Des. 88(6–8), 1156–1160 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Papa S, Patalano S, Lanzotti A, Gerbino S, Choley JY Towards the integration of thermal physics and geometrical constraints for a 3D-multiphysical sketcher. In: Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering. ISSE, 7302765, pp. 248–252 (2015)

  31. Franciosa, P., Gerbino, S., Lanzotti, A., Silvestri, L.: Improving comfort of shoe sole through experiments based on CAD-FEM modeling. Med. Eng. Phys. 35(1), 36–46 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Franciosa, P., Gerbino, S., Lanzotti, A., Patalano, S.: Automatic evaluation of variational parameters for tolerance analysis of rigid parts based on graphs. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 7(4), 239–248 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank: Professors Francesco Caputo, Giuseppe Di Gironimo, Salvatore Gerbino and Massimo Martorelli for their valuable help; Engineers Giuseppe Amodeo, Alessio Balsamo, Domenico Del Giudice, Domenico Marzullo, Rocco Mozzillo, Gabriele Staiano, Andrea Tarallo, Ferdinando Vitolo, and Mr. Luigi Calvanese for their technical support; Prof. E. Chirone and Prof. S. Tornincasa for the use of some images from their “Disegno Tecnico Industriale” handbook and Prof. Edoardo Rovida for his cues about the history of drawing and technical communication; Mario Lanzotti for the valued hints about the engineering of the complex inventions by the Italian comic character Diabolik and “Astorina” Publisher for the use of Diabolik images; the colleagues who teach Engineering Drawing, at Italian Universities, for their contents available on line that are largely mentioned in the course.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Renno.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanzotti, A., Calise, M., Molaro, M. et al. ‘Federica’s MOOC’ (Massive Open Online Course): a blended course in engineering drawing at Federico II. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13, 1115–1128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00575-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00575-6

Keywords

Navigation