Skip to main content
Log in

A global approach to manage the performance of the problem solving process in innovative design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on the problem solving process in design. Today, enterprises face an important need of innovation, as they have to regularly propose new products or new services. Design is one of the key activities of enterprises in order to be innovative, but it is also one whose performances are hard to assess and activities difficult to manage. Studies on performance of the design process are quite few. Despite there exists many tools to evaluate and manage performance in a variety of fields, few tools are proposed Please check and confirm the author names and initials. Amend if necessary.or customized for the design activity. Some parts of this activity are more or less manageable, but one remains hardly controllable: the problem solving process. Three main topics are tackled in this article. Firstly, the article defines the performance, the enterprise organization, the design activity and the role of problem solving in this activity. Then the focus will be done on the ways to measure and manage the performance of problem solving in design; criteria to evaluate it and a set of indicators that impact it are proposed. In last, the use of this set of indicators will be proposed and a link between the indicators and a strategic choice will be established in order to build the problem solving process in accordance with this strategic position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CEN, ECfS.: CEN/TC 389—Innovation Management. 2014. Available from: http://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:671850&cs=1E977FFA493E636619BDED775DB4E2A76

  2. CEN, ECfS.: Innovation management—Part 1: innovation management system. In: CEN/TS 16555-1:2013. (2013)

  3. Cavallucci, D.: A research agenda for computing developments associated with innovation pipelines. Comput. Ind. 62(4), 377–383 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Girard, P., Doumeingts, G.: Modelling the engineering design system to improve performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 46(1), 43–67 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coates, G., Duffy, A.H.B., Whitfield, I., Hills, W.: Engineering management: operational design coordination. J. Eng. Des. 15(5), 433–446 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sim, S.K., Duffy, A.H.B.: Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Res. Eng. Des. 14, 200–223 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taheri, A., Cavallucci, D., Oget, D.: Positioning ideality in inventive design; distinction, characteristics, measurement. In: Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 2014 International ICE Conference on (2014)

  8. Taheri, A., Cavallucci, D., Oget, D.: A model for exploring technological changes in new systems. In: TRIZ Future Conference. Lausanne, Suisse (2014)

  9. Kim, D.Y., Xirouchakis, P.: CO2DE: a decision support system for collaborative design. J. Eng. Des. 21(1), 31–48 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serna, L., Merlo, C., Zolghadri, M., Minel, S.: Actors’ networks management for design co-ordination. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 5(1), 67–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calle-Escobar, M., Mejía-Gutiérrez, R., Nadeau, J.-P., Pailhes, J.: Heuristics-based design process. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM), pp. 1–18 (2014)

  12. Hu, Y., Aziz, E.-S.S., Chassapis, C.: Creativity-based design innovation environment in support of robust product development. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM), pp. 1–19 (2014)

  13. Alsyouf, I., Al-Alami, A., Saidam, A.: Implementing product design development methodology for assessing and improving the performance of products. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 9(3), 225–234 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, X., Nadeau, J.-P.: Interactive design: then and now. in research in interactive design. In: Virtual, Interactive and Integrated Product Design and Manufacturing for Industrial Innovation, vol. 3, pp. 1–5. Springer Paris, Paris (2011)

  15. Porter, M.E.: Competitive advantage : creating and sustaining superior performance, pp. 592. Free Press, New York (1998)

  16. Lorino, P.: Méthodes et pratiques de la performance. Editions d’Organisation ed. Paris (2003)

  17. Gibert, P.: Le Contrôle de gestion dans les organisations publiques Éditions d’Organisation ed., Paris (1980)

  18. Gartiser, N., Lerch, C., Lutz, P.: Appréhender la dynamique d’évolution des organisations. Vers une opérationalisation des modèles de Mintzberg. in XIIIème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique. Normandie-Vallée de Seine, France (2004)

  19. Fortuin, L.: Performance indicators—why, where and how? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 34(1), 1–9 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lohman, C., Fortuin, L., Wouters, M.: Designing a performance measurement system: a case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 267–286 (2004)

  21. Suh, N.P.: Axiomatic Design : Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cash, P., Hicks, B., Culley, S.: Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: a protocol study of design in practice. Des. Stud. 38, 1–32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design : A Systematic Approach. Springer, New York (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Suh, N.P.: The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)

  25. Hicks, B.J., Culley, S.J., McAlpine, H.C., McMahon, C.A.: The fundamentals of an intelligent design observatory for researching the impact of tools, teams and technologies on information use and design performance. In: International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’07). Paris, France (2007)

  26. O’Donnell, F.J., Duffy, A.H.B.: Design Performance. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Toh, C.A., Miller, S.R.: How engineering teams select design concepts: a view through the lens of creativity. Des. Stud. 38, 111–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonardel, N.: Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Knowl. Based Syst. 13, 505–513 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon, H.A.: The structure of ill-structured problems. Artif. Intell. 4, 181–201 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon, H.A.: Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving. In: \(1^{{\rm st}}\) International Congress on Planning and Design Theory. Boston, USA (1987)

  31. Kaposi, A., Myers, M.: Systems for All. Imperial College Press, Singapore (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Cabannes, G., Troussier, N., Gidel, T., Cherfi, Z.: An uncertainty-based approach to drive product preliminary design. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 5(1), 55–65 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Coates, G., Duffy, A.H.B., Whitfield, I.: A preliminary approach for modelling and planning the composition of engineering project teams. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 221(7), 1255–1265 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stoyell, J.L., Kane, G., Norman, P.W., Ritchey, I.: Analyzing design activities which affect the life-cycle environmental performance of large made-to-order products. Des. Stud. 22(1), 67–86 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Maranzana, N., Dubois, S., Gartiser, N., Caillaud, E.: Proposal of a system of indicators to measure performance of problem solving process in design. In: International Design Conference—Design’08. Dubrovnik, Croatia (2008)

  36. Moreno, D.P., et al.: Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: a focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Des. Stud. 35(3), 232–272 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taheri, A., Cavallucci, D., Oget, D.: Measuring the efficiency of inventive activities along inventive projects in R&D. In: TRIZ Future 2013. France, Paris (2013)

  38. Silverstein, D., DeCarlo, N., Slocum, M.S.: Insourcing innovation: how to achieve competitive excellence using TRIZ. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2007)

  39. Lin, L., Dubois, S., De Guio, R., Rasovska, I.: An exact algorithm to extract the generalized physical contradiction. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 9(3), 185–191 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Maranzana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dubois, S., Maranzana, N., Gartiser, N. et al. A global approach to manage the performance of the problem solving process in innovative design. Int J Interact Des Manuf 11, 351–363 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0357-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0357-9

Keywords

Navigation