Abstract
Innovation is now seen as a question of corporate survival and international competitiveness. While most innovation fails, companies that don’t innovate in the long term die. The importance of crafting a sound and coherent innovation strategy appears crucial in many industries, even more in turbulent environments where clear guidelines help managers allocate R&D resources internally or acquire technologies outside the firm. The paper is organized the following way: in Sect. 2 the rigidity and structure related with strategic planning are compared with the flexibility and learning approach of strategy-making. In Sect. 3, organic (or internal) growth and external development of innovation are analyzed. In Sect. 4, the link between innovation strategy-making and R&D resource allocation is covered. In Sect. 5, a discussion section integrates and compares the key streams in the strategy-making literature that is particularly relevant for innovation management. Finally, in conclusion some areas for further research are suggested. Some authors argue that formal planning and incrementalism both form part of good strategic planning, especially in unstable environments. They also report that a period of learning in planning is also important. The crucial issue seems to be how individual learning is transferred to the organization and the shared mental models are what make the rest of the organizational memory usable. One tool which can stimulates such individual and organizational learning is the recent popularity of corporate universities. The aim of managers should be to institutionalize learning. It is necessary to strengthen and diversify competencies in an organizational process to so called “metacompetencies”. For Hamel and Prahalad, strategy is more than the allocation of scarce resources across competing projects; it is the quest to overcome resource constraints through a creative and unending pursuit of better resource leverage with the corporation conceived as a portfolio of competencies as well as a portfolio of businesses, and innovation projects. Incumbents that focus their network strategy on exploiting complementary assets through alliances generally outperform incumbents that focus on exploring the new technology. The technological strategies of corporate firms have several similarities to the investment strategy of venture capitalists. They are looking for complementarities between investments to nurture specialized knowledge and extract greater value with synergies. Appendix 2 proposes a new integrative model by making the connections between the strategy-making process and the R&D strategic resource allocation management process. Top managers should try to control the initial cost structure of new growth business, because it influence greatly the critical resource allocation decisions in that business, and also recognize emergent strategies through process such as discovery-driven planning and select the right mix of emergent versus deliberate strategies for each businesses in the organization. The determinants of product innovation in firms are mainly explained by the strategy being pursued and managers should be careful to not drift toward excessive conservatism or excessive entrepreneurship over innovation management. Some experts argue that strategic management, when continuously practised may develop in a firm core capability may have more enduring effects on the firm’s long-term performance than one-time strategies. Flexible strategic planning for innovation management appears more efficient, particularly in turbulent environments. A bottom-up approach of technology strategy-making favorizes the crafting of emergent strategies. One tool, communities of practice has an important influence on strategy-making for innovation management due to empowerment. A corporate university can become another influent knowledge management strategic tool, only if enough resources are devoted to its development and managers adopt a long-term perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Perceived value or quality.
(i.e. SONET products at Nortel have faced a technological impasse over Ethernet and IP products, since the market didn’t support this type of technological due to a lack of industrial commitment.)
They are among the first investors in America Online, Compaq, Netscape, Juniper, Sun, Genentech. Such companies defined new business sectors or redefined existing ones.
See Table 2.
References
Chesbrough, H.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)
Matheson, D., Matheson, J.: The Smart Organization: Creating Value Through Strategic R&D. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)
Burgelman, R., Maidique, M., Wheelwright, S.: Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, 2nd edn. Irwin, Boston (1995)
Markides, C.: Strategic innovation. Sloan Manag. Review. 38, 9–24 (1997)
Christensen, C.: The Innovator’s Dilemma: When Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1997)
Brews, P.J., Hunt, M.R.: Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strateg. Manag. J. 20, 889–913 (1999)
Andrews, K.: The Concept of Corporate Strategy, 3rd edn. Irwin, Homewood (1987)
Mintzberg, H.: The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving the Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners. Free Press, Toronto, New York, pp. 458 (1994)
Quinn, J.B.: Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism. Irwin, Homewood (1980)
Andersen, T.J.: Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance. Long Range Plan. 33(2), 184–200 (2000)
Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Creativity versus structure: a useful tension. Sloan Manag. Rev. 41–46 (2001)
Miller, D.: Configurations of strategy and structure: towards a synthesis. Strateg. Manag. J. 7, 233–249 (1986)
Miles, R., Snow, C.: Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)
Harris, L.: The learning organisation-myth or reality? Examples from the UK retail banks. Learn. Organ. 9(2), 78–88 (2002)
Rhéaume, L., Gardoni, M.: The challenges facing corporate universities in dealing with open innovation. J. Workplace Learn. 27(4), 315–328 (2015)
Pulcrano, J: Serving the Future Needs of Business in Management Development and Retention, AACB, EMBAC & UNICON, 1–78 (2013)
Senge, P.: Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Century, London (1990)
Crossan, M., Berdrow, I.: Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strateg. Manag. J. 24, 1087–1105 (2003)
Cohen, W., Levinthal, D.: Innovation and learning: two faces of R&D. Econ. J. 99(397), 569–596 (1989)
Mintzberg, H., Waters, J.: Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg. Manag. J. 6, 257–272 (1985)
Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K.: Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1994)
Barney, J.: Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1996)
Miller, D.: An asymmetry-based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(10), 961–976 (2003)
Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B.: Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 28(1), 63–80 (1999)
Spencer, J.: Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(3), 217–233 (2003)
Rothaermel, F.T.: Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(6–7), 687–699 (2001)
Danneels, E.: The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strateg. Manag. J. 23, 1095–1121 (2002)
Brown, S., Eisenhardt, K.: Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)
Roberts, E., Liu, W.K.: Ally or acquire? How technology leaders decide. Sloan Manag. Rev. 17, 161–181 (2001)
Quinn, J.B.: Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth. Sloan Manag. Rev. 183–220 (2000)
Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R., Moesel, D.: The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 39(5), 1084–1119 (1996)
Debruyne, M., Moenaert, R., Griffin, A., Hart, S., Hultink, E.J., Robben, H.: The impact of new product launch strategies on competitive reaction in industrial markets. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 19(2), 159–170 (2002)
Porter, M.: Competitive strategy revisited: a view from the 1990s. In: Barker Duffy, P. (ed.) The Relevance of a Decade, pp. 244–285. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (1994)
Waites, R.: Reinventing corporate research. Res. Technol. Manag. 45(4), 15–23 (2002)
Burgelman, R.A.: Fading memories: a process study of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 24–56 (1994)
Burgelman, R.: A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 28(2), 223–244 (1983)
Noda, T., Bower, J.: Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 159–192 (1996)
Christensen, C., Raynor, M.: The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)
Rhéaume, L.: A review of literature on the strategic portfolio management of innovation projects, ÉTS, Working paper (2014)
Christensen, C., Bower, J.: Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 197–218 (1996)
Mezias, S., Glynn, M.A.: The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution. Strateg. Manag. J. 14(2), 77–101 (1993)
O’Brien, J.: The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(5), 415–431 (2003)
Miller, D., Friesen, P.H.: Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum. Strateg. Manag. J. 3(1), 1–25 (1982)
Chakravarthy, B.: A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Manag. Rev. 38(2), 69–82 (1997)
Farjoun, M.: Towards an organic perspective on strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 23(7), 561–594 (2002)
Grove, A.: Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company. Random House, New York (1996)
Song, M., Im, S., van der Bij, H., Song, L.Z.: Does strategic planning enhance or impede innovation and firm performance? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(4), 503–520 (2011)
Suzuki, Y.: NEC charts path to future prosperity. Strateg. Dir. 16(7), 25–26 (2000)
Methe, D.T., Toyama, R., Miyabe, J.: Product development strategy and organizational learning: a tale of two PC makers. J. Product. Innov. Manag. 14(5), 323–337 (1997)
Cristol, D., Mellet, D.: Développer une université d’entreprise: créer un levier de business development, ED. SOCIALES FRANCAISES, ESF Éditeur (2013)
Saint-Onge, H., Wallace, D.: Leveraging Communities of Practice for Strategic Advantage. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington (2011). 370 pages
Schiavone, F.: Communities of Practice and Vintage Innovation. Springer Briefs in Business. Springer, New York (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhéaume, L., Gardoni, M. Strategy-making for innovation management and the development of corporate universities. Int J Interact Des Manuf 10, 73–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0291-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0291-2