Skip to main content
Log in

Surface modification of polyarylene sulfide sulfone membrane by coating with polydopamine

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyarylene sulfide sulfone membrane was surface-modified by coating with polydopamine to improve its hydrophilic property and permeation performance, and owing to its favorable solvent resistance, it could be applied in the filtration of organic wastewater. The change in the morphology and chemical properties was ascertained by SEM and FTIR, which suggested that polydopamine was adsorbed at the polyarylene sulfide sulfone (PASS) membrane. It was confirmed that the hydrophilic property of PASS membrane was enhanced through water contact angle measurement. Moreover, it possessed an improved flux compared with the pristine PASS membrane even after high temperature and organic solvent treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darnoko, D, Cheryan, M, “Carotenoids from Red Palm Methyl Esters by Nanofiltration.” J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 83 (4) 365–370 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kondal Reddy, K, Kawakatsu, T, Snape, JB, et al., “Membrane Concentration and Separation of l-Aspartic Acid and l-Phenylalanine Derivatives in Organic Solvents.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 31 (8) 1161–1178 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ebert, K, Petrus, CF, “Solvent Resistant Nano-Filtration Membranes in Edible Oil Processing.” Membr. Technol., 1999 (107) 5–8 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panda, AB, Laha, P, Harish, K, et al., “Study of Bactericidal Efficiency of Magnetron Sputtered TiO2 Films Deposited at Varying Oxygen Partial Pressure.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 205 (5) 1611–1617 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan, B, Cao, M, Sun, H, et al., “Preparation of a Polyimide Nanofiltration Membrane for Lubricant Solvent Recovery.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 131 (15) 264–272 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scarpello, JT, Nair, D, Santos, LMFD, et al., “The Separation of Homogeneous Organometallic Catalysts Using Solvent Resistant Nanofiltration.” J. Membr. Sci., 203 (1) 71–85 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Firman, LR, Ochoa, NA, Marchese, J, et al., “Deacidification and Solvent Recovery of Soybean Oil by Nanofiltration Membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 431 (6) 187–196 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agenson, KO, Urase, T, “Change in Membrane Performance Due to Organic Fouling in Nanofiltration (NF)/Reverse Osmosis (RO) Applications.” Sep. Purif. Technol., 55 (2) 147–156 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shafi, HZ, Matin, A, Khan, Z, et al., “Surface Modification of Reverse Osmosis Membranes with Zwitterionic Coatings: A Potential Strategy for Control of Biofouling.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 279 171–179 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Braeken, L, Boussu, K, Bruggen, BVD, et al., “Modeling of the Adsorption of Organic Compounds on Polymeric Nanofiltration Membranes in Solutions Containing Two Compounds.” ChemPhysChem, 6 (8) 1606 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu, LP, Zhu, BK, Li, X, et al., “Corona-Induced Graft Polymerization for Surface Modification of Porous Polyethersulfone Membranes.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253 (14) 6052–6059 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao, X, Chen, F, Wei, Q, et al., “Surface Modification of Polyester Nonwoven Fabrics by Al2O3 Sol–Gel Coating.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 6 (4) 537 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, MS, Chun, B, Kim, SS, “Surface Modification of Polypropylene Membrane by Low-Temperature Plasma Treatment.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81 (6) 1555–1566 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, J, Xie, J, Ling, L, et al., “Surface Modification of Nanosilica with 3-Mercaptopropyl Trimethoxysilane and Investigation of Its Effect on the Properties of UV Curable Coatings.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 10 (6) 849–857 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, YQ, Wang, T, Su, YL, et al., “Protein-Adsorption-Resistance and Permeation Property of Polyethersulfone and Soybean Phosphatidylcholine Blend Ultrafiltration Membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 270 (1–2) 108–114 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shi, JL, Fang, LF, Zhang, H, et al., “Influences of Extractant on the Hydrophilicity and Performances of HDPE/PE-b-PEG Blend Membranes Prepared via Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS) Process.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 130 (4) 2680–2687 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, HC, Luo, J, Lv, Y, et al., “Surface Engineering of Polymer Membranes via Mussel-Inspired Chemistry.” J. Membr. Sci., 483 42–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xi, ZY, Xu, YY, Zhu, LP, et al., “A Facile Method of Surface Modification for Hydrophobic Polymer Membranes Based on the Adhesive Behavior of Poly(DOPA) and Poly(Dopamine).” J. Membr. Sci., 327 (1–2) 244–253 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silverman, HG, Roberto, FF, “Understanding Marine Mussel Adhesion.” Mar. Biotechnol., 9 (6) 661–681 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burzio, LA, Waite, JH, “Crosslinking in Adhesive Quinoproteins: Studies with Model Decapeptides.” Biochemistry, 39 (36) 11147–11153 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leeden, MCVD, “Are Conformational Changes, Induced by Osmotic Pressure Variations, the Underlying Mechanism of Controlling the Adhesive Activity of Mussel Adhesive Proteins.” Langmuir, 21 (24) 11373–11379 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Y, Bhatnagar, A, Ji, Q, et al., “Influence of Polymerization Conditions on the Molecular Structure Stability and Physical Behavior of Poly(Phenylene Sulfide Sulfone) Homopolymers.” Polymer, 41 (13) 5137–5146 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan, S, Wang, J, Wang, X, et al., “Poly(Arylene Sulfide Sulfone) Hybrid Ultrafiltration Membrane with TiO2-g-PAA Nanoparticles: Preparation and Antifouling Performance.” Polym. Eng. Sci., 55 (12) 2829–2837 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, G, Ren, HH, Li, DS, et al., “Synthesis of Highly Refractive and Transparent Poly(Arylene Sulfide Sulfone) Based on 4,6-Dichloropyrimidine and 3,6-Dichloropyridazine.” Polymer, 54 (2) 601–606 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guillen, GR, Pan, Y, Li, M, et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Membranes Formed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation: A Review.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50 (7) 3798–3817 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China projects (51573103, 21274094, and 21304060) and the National Key Laboratory Project (oic-201701006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaojun Wang or Jie Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, C., Cao, S., Wang, Y. et al. Surface modification of polyarylene sulfide sulfone membrane by coating with polydopamine. J Coat Technol Res 16, 643–650 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-018-00172-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-018-00172-4

Keywords

Navigation