Abstract
Appeals to scrutinize the use of race and ethnicity as variables in genetics research notwithstanding, these variables continue to be inadequately explained and inconsistently used in research publications. In previous research, we found that published genetic research fails to follow suggestions offered for addressing this problem, such as explaining the basis on which these labels are assigned to populations. This study, an analysis of genetic research articles using race or ethnicity terms, explores possible features of journals that are associated with improved reporting of race and ethnicity in genetic research. A journal’s expressed commitment to improving how race and ethnicity are used in genetic research, demonstrated by an editorial or in its instructions to authors, was the strongest predictor of following recommendations about reporting race and ethnicity. Journal impact factor had only a limited positive effect on attention to these issues, suggesting that editorial resources associated with higher impact factor journals are not sufficient to improve practices. Our findings reiterate that race and ethnicity variables are used inconsistently in genetic research, but also shed light on how journals might improve practices by highlighting the need for scientists to carefully scrutinize the use of these variables in their work.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thomson ISI (Institute for Scientific Information) Web of Knowledge database tracks the citation history of journal article citations. Based on citation frequency, each journal is assigned an impact factor score that serves as a proxy measure for a journal’s importance to its field (Thomson ISI 2005a, b).
Including black, white, Caucasian, European-American, Asian, Hispanic American, Mexican American, Native American, American Indian, Alaskan American, African American, Inuit, Gypsy (or Gypsies) Arab, and Jew. In late 2003 MEDLINE revised its MeSH terminology for race and ethnicity categories (Sankar 2003). The list of terms used here represents the pre-2003 MeSH terms, which was operative during most of the period covered by our sample. Its use by MEDLINE suggests a sufficient overlap with popular usage to warrant adoption here.
Our article sample was created also to test differences between ISI journal categories, such as genetic and clinical. This analysis required that there be sufficient articles in these categories from similarly ranked journals, which is the reason that the number of articles in the high impact factor journal sample is considerably higher than the number in the general sample.
References
Andreason, R. O. (2005). The meaning of “Race”: Folk conceptions and the new biology of race. Journal of Philosophy, 102, 94–106.
Anonymous. (1996). Style matters: Ethnicity, race, and culture: Guidelines for research, audit, and publication. British Medical Journal, 312, 1094.
Anonymous. (2000). Census, race, and science. Nature Genetics, 24, 97–98.
Anonymous. (2004) The unexamined ‘Caucasian’. Nature Genetics, 36(6), 541.
Bennett, T. (1997). “Racial” and ethnic classification: Two steps forward and one step back? Public Health Reports, 112, 477–480.
Buchanan, C. C., Torstenson, E. S., Bush, W. S., Ritchie, M. D. (2012). A comparison of cataloged variation between International HapMap Consortium and 1000 Genomes Project data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, 289–294.
Burchard, E. G., Ziv, E., Coyle, N., Gomez, S. L., Tang, H., Karter, A. J., et al. (2003). The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(12), 1170–1175.
Cooper, R. S., Kaufman, J. S., & Ward, R. (2003). Race and genomics. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(12), 1166–1170.
Davis, M., Bruckman, D., Cabana, M., Clark, S., Dombkowski, K., Kemper, A., et al. (2001). Constructive use of race and ethnicity variables. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 155, 973.
Dutton, G., (2006) Correlating genomics, race, and medicine researchers strive to quantify racial role in disease risk & treatment. Genetic Engineering News, 26(1), 1–+.
Ellison, G. T. H., Smart, A., Tutton, R., Outram, S. M., Ashcroft, R., & Martin, P. (2007). Racial categories in medicine: A failure of evidence-based practice? Public Library of Science Medicine, 4, 1434–1436.
Gambaro, G., Anglani, F., & D’Angelo, A. (2000). Association studies of genetic polymorphisms and complex disease. The Lancet, 355, 308–311.
Goodman, A. H. (1998). The race pit. Anthropology Newsletter, 39, 50–52.
Hamilton, J. A. (2008). Revitalizing difference in the HapMap: Race and contemporary human genetic variation research. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 36(3), 471–477.
Haney-Lopez, I. F. (1994). The social construction of race: Some observations on illusion, fabrication, and choice. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 29(1), 1–62. 66–67, 11–17.
Havranek, E. P., & Masoudi, F. A. (2004). What we’re talking about when we talk about race. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 436–437.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2003). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved April 19, 2004, www.icmje.org.
International HapMap Project. (2005). Guidelines for referring to the HapMap populations in publications and presentations. http://www.hapmap.org/citinghapmap.html.
Ioannadis, J., Ntzani, E., & Trikalinos, T. (2004). ‘Racial’ differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nature Genetics, 36, 1312–1318.
Jenkins, G., Merz, J., & Sankar, P. (2005). A qualitative study of women’s views on medical confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 499–504.
Kaplan, J., & Bennett, T. (2003). Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 2709–2716.
Koenig, B. A., Lee, S. S. J., & Richardson, S. (2008). Revisiting race in a genomic age. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
Lee, S. S., Mountain, J., Koenig, B., Altman, R., Brown, M., Camarillo, A., et al. (2008). The ethics of characterizing difference: Guiding principles on using racial categories in human genetics. Genome Biology, 9, 404.
Muhr, T. (2004). User’s manual for ATLAS.ti. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH.
Mukamal, K., Conigrave, K., Mittleman, M., Camargo, C, Jr., Stampfer, M., Willett, W., et al. (2003). Roles of drinking pattern and type of alcohol consumed in coronary heart disease in men. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 109–118.
Mykytyn, K., Nishimura, D., Searby, C., Beck, G., Bugge, K., Haines, H., et al. (2003). Evaluation of complex inheritance involving the most common Bardet-Biedl syndrome locus (BBS1). American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 429–437.
Nebert, D. W., & Menon, A. (2001). Pharmacogenomics, ethnicity, and susceptibility genes. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 1(1), 19–22.
Osborne, N. G., & Feit, M. D. (1992). The use of race in medical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 275–279.
Phimister, E. G. (2003). Medicine and the racial divide. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1081–1082.
Rivara, F., & Finberg, L. (2001). Use of the terms race and ethnicity. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 155, 119.
Sankar, P. (2003). Medline definitions of race and ethnicity and their application to genetic research. Nature Genetics, 34(2), 119.
Sankar, P. (2013). Genomics research and race: Refining claims about essentialism. In J. Hartigan (Ed.), Anthropology of Race Genes, Biology, and Culture, (pp. 107-124). SAR Press: Santa Fe, NM.
Sankar, P., Cho, M. K., & Mountain, J. L. (2007). Race and ethnicity in genetic research. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 9(143A), 961–970.
Smart, A., Tutton, R., Ashcroft, R., Martin, P. A., & Ellison, G. T. H. (2006). Can science alone improve the measurement and communication of race and ethnicity in genetic research? Exploring the strategies proposed by nature genetics. BioSocieties, 1, 313–324.
Sondik, E., Lucas, J., Madans, J., & Smith, S. (2000). Race/ethnicity and the 2000 census: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1709–1713.
Thomson ISI. (2005a). Journal citation reports. Retrieved July 1, 2005, www.isinet.com.
Thomson ISI. (2005b). The impact factor. Retrieved July 25, 2005, www.isinet.com/essays/journalcitationreports/7.html.
Van der Weyden, M. (2007). The ICMJE and URM: Providing independent advice for the conduct of biomedical research and publication. In A. Singh & S. Singh (Eds.), The academia-industry symposium MSM 2007: Medical practice and pharmaceutical industry. And ever the duo shall meet: MSM, 5, 15–24.
Wilson, J. F., Weale, M. E., Smith, A. C., Gratix, F., Fletcher, F., Thomas, M. G., et al. (2001). Population genetic structure of variable drug response. Nature Genetics, 29, 265–269.
Winker, M. (2004). Measuring race and ethnicity: Why and how? Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1612–1614.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the Public Health Service (R01-HG003191).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sankar, P., Cho, M.K., Monahan, K. et al. Reporting Race and Ethnicity in Genetics Research: Do Journal Recommendations or Resources Matter?. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 1353–1366 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9596-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9596-y