Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

  • Critical Care Neurology (H Hinson, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

This review presents the current evidence and recommendations regarding surgical management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). In particular, we discuss the emerging minimally invasive surgical techniques and provide a surgical decision-making algorithm based on current evidence for the practicing clinician.

Recent findings

Hematoma evacuation is an attractive strategy to relieve mass effect, reduce intracranial pressure, and prevent secondary ongoing tissue injury and thereby reduce mortality and improve outcome. Enthusiasm for open surgical techniques such as craniotomy with clot evacuation waned after two large pragmatic trials failed to demonstrate superiority for good functional outcome. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) strategies such as endoscopic evacuation and stereotactic aspiration ± thrombolysis are safe, have less operative morbidity, and probably have a mortality benefit but clear evidence of functional benefit has not been shown yet. In the last decade, the advent of newer minimally invasive devices in combination with novel imaging and navigation tools has facilitated several ongoing randomized trials to answer this elusive question.

Summary

With careful patient selection and ongoing advances in MIS, it is anticipated that in the next few years, one or more of the MIS techniques will become the standard for surgical management of both lobar and deep ICH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Recommended Reading and References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Hanley DF, Awad IA, Vespa PM, Martin NA, Zuccarello M. Hemorrhagic stroke: introduction. Stroke. 2013 Jun;44(6 Suppl 1):S65–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000856.

  2. Van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel AA, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality and functional outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage over time according to age, sex and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(2):167–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flaherty ML, Kissela B, Woo D, Kleindorfer D, Alwell K, Sekar P, et al. The increasing incidence of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2007;68:116–21. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000250340.05202.8b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sacco S, Marini C, Toni D, Olivieri L, Carolei A. Incidence and 10-year survival of intracerebral hemorrhage in a population-based registry. Stroke. 2009;40:394–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keep RF, Hua Y, Xi G. Intracerebral haemorrhage: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(8):720–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Venkatasubramanian C, Mlynash M, Finley-Caulfield A, Eyngorn I, Kalimuthu R, Snider RW, et al. Natural history of perihematomal edema after intracerebral hemorrhage measured by serial magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 2011;42(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.590646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leira R, Dávalos A, Silva Y, Gil-Peralta A, Tejada J, Garcia M, et al. Early neurologic deterioration in intracerebral hemorrhage: predictors and associated factors. Neurology. 2004;63:461–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis SM, Broderick J, Hennerici M, Brun NC, Diringer MN, Mayer SA, et al. Recombinant Activated Factor VII Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trial Investigators. Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:1175–81. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000208408.98482.99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delcourt C, Huang Y, Arima H, Chalmers J, Davis SM, Heeley EL, et al. Anderson CS; INTERACT1 Investigators. Hematoma growth and outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage: the INTERACT1 study. Neurology. 2012;79:314–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318260cbba.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lam AM, Singh V, O’Meara AM. Emergency neurological life support: intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00814-4.This article highlights a practical algorithm for acute management of ICH including blood pressure, coagulopathy, ICP and surgery.

  11. Selim M, Foster LD, Moy CS, Xi G, Hill MD, Morgenstern LB, et al. Yeatts SD; i-DEF Investigators. Deferoxamine mesylate in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (i-DEF): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):428–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30069-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. •• Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Hope DT, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9457):387–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X.This is the largest randomized surgical ICH trial evaluating open craniotomy in both lobar and deep ICH compared to medical management.

  13. •• Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):397–408.This was a follow up randomized surgical ICH trial after STICH-1 and evaluated open craniotomy versus best medical management for patients with superficial lobar ICH.

  14. •• Gregson BA, Broderick JP, Auer LM, Batjer H, Chen XC, Juvela S, et al. Individual patient data subgroup meta-analysis of surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1496–504. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640284.This meta analysis includes all open craniotomy trials for supratentorial ICH (lobar and deep ICH) and analyses data at the patient level showing the superiority of surgical evacuation in select patients.

  15. •• Hemphill JC, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, Becker K, Bendok BR, Cushman M, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000069.This AHA guideline contains the latest iteration of comprehensive recommendations for workup and management of ICH.

  16. Das S, Mitchell P, Ross N, Whitfield PC. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in the treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1119–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1605215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use. predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke. 1993;24:987–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moussa WMM, Khedr W. Decompressive craniectomy and expansive duraplasty with evacuation of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma, a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;40:115–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu R, Feng H. Clot evacuation with or without decompressive craniectomy for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a single center prosective randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2016;47:ATP360.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rasrasa S, Safaria H, Zeinalia M, Jahangirib M. Decompressive hemicraniectomy without clot evacuation in supratentorial deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;174:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. • Yao Z, Ma L, You C, Min H. Decompressive craniectomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:121–8. Meta analysis on decompressive craniectomy with or without clot evacuation for supratentorial spontaneous ICH.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. • Poblete RA, Zheng L, Arenas M, Vazquez A, Yu D, Emanuel BA, et al. Older age is not associated with worse outcomes following decompressive hemicraniectomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(11):104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104320.Retrospective analysis of a large inpatient database in the US after decompressive craniectomy for ICH showing that old age is not associated with excessive mortality after surgery.

  24. Datar S, Rabinstein A. Cerebellar hemorrhage. Neurol Clin. 2014;32(4):993–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Firsching R, Huber M, Frowein RA. Cerebellar haemorrhage: management and prognosis. Neurosurg Rev. 1991;14:191–4 239.

  26. Da Pian R, Bazzan A, Pasqualin A. Surgical versus medical treatment of spontaneous posterior fossa haematomas: a cooperative study on 205 cases. Neurol Res. 1984;6(238):145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Goffin J, Plets C. Controversies in the management of spontaneous cerebellar haemorrhage: a consecutive series of 49 cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir. 1993;122:187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Kuramatsu JB, Biffi A, Gerner ST, et al. Association of surgical hematoma evacuation vs conservative treatment with functional outcome in patients with cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA. 2019;322(14):1392–403. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.13014.Metaanalysis of individual patient data of 578 patients cerebellar hemorrhage comparing open surgical evacuation with decompressive suboccipital craniectomy with conservative medical management concluding that surgery is associated with mortality benefit but not functional benefit.

  29. Dahdaleh NS, Dlouhy BJ, Viljoen SV, et al. Clinical and radiographic predictors of neurological outcome following posterior fossa decompression for spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:1236–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu G, Li C, Wang L, Mao Y, Hong Z. Minimally invasive procedures for evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage reduces perihematomal glutamate content, blood brain barrier permeability and brain edema in rabbits. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:118–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vespa P, Hanley D, Betz J, et al. ICES (Intraoperative Stereotactic Computed Tomography-Guided Endoscopic Surgery) for brain hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:2749–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. • Kellner CP, Chartrain AG, Nistal DA, et al. The Stereotactic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Underwater Blood Aspiration (SCUBA) technique for minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2018;10:771–6.A 47-patient series describing the application of a dry-field and wet-field combination method of endoscopic ICH evacuation resulting in average reduction in ICH volumes by 89%.

  33. Atsumi H, Baba T, Sunaga A, Sakakibara Y, Nonaka Y, Sorimach T, et al. Neuroendoscopic evacuation for spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage is a safe and secure approach and may become a mainstream technique. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Nov;59(11):423–9. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0108.

  34. Miller DW, Barnett GH, Kormos DW, Steiner CP. Stereotactically guided thrombolysis of deep cerebral hemorrhage: preliminary results. Cleve Clin J Med. 1993;60:321–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Montes JM, Wong JH, Fayad PB, Awad IA. Stereotactic computed tomographic-guided aspiration and thrombolysis of intracerebral hematoma: protocol and preliminary experience. Stroke. 2000;31:834–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rohde V, Rohde I, Reinges MH, Mayfrank L, Gilsbach JM. Frameless stereotactically guided catheter placement and fibrinolytic therapy for spontaneous intracerebral hematomas: technical aspects and initial clinical results. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2000;43:9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Teernstra OPM, Evers SMAA, Lodder J, Leffers P, Franke CL, Blaauw G, et al. Stereotactic treatment of intracerebral hematoma by means of a plasminogen activator: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (SICHPA). Stroke. 2003;34:968–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang WZ, Jiang B, Liu HM, et al. Minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs. conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: results from a randomized clinical trial in China. Int J Stroke. 2009;4:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang JW, Li JP, Song YL, et al. Stereotactic aspiration versus craniotomy for primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Muschelli J, et al. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1228–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. •• Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Rosenblum M, et al. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III): a randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10175):1021–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30195-3.MISTIE 3 was an open label randomized trial of 499 patients with spontaneous ICH comparing minimally invasive catheter evacuation followed by intraclot thrombolysis with tPA versus medical management.

  42. Awad IA, Polster SP, Carrión-Penagos J, et al. Surgical performance determines functional outcome benefit in the minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) procedure. Neurosurgery. 2019;84:1157–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Przybylowski CJ, Ding D, Starke RM, et al. Endoport-assisted surgery for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1727–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. •• Labib MA, Shah M, Kassam AB, et al. The safety and feasibility of image-guided brainpath-mediated transsulcul hematoma evacuation: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:515–24. Retrospective series of 39 patientswho underwent minimally invasive surgical evacuation using an atraumatic white matter sparing approach (i.e. transsulcal evacuation). This technique is now being studied in a prospective trial.

  45. Scaggiante J, Zhang X, Mocco J, Kellner CP. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2612–20. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020688.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chitra Venkatasubramanian MBBS, MD, MSc, FNCS.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Critical Care Neurology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walia, S., Fisher, K., Dodd, R.L. et al. Surgical Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Neurol 23, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-021-00678-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-021-00678-0

Keywords

Navigation