Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

POEM in the Treatment of Esophageal Disorders

  • Esophagus (PG Iyer, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Purpose of the review

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel minimally invasive technique that has emerged as the preferred option for the treatment of achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders (SED) at many centers around the world. In this article, we review and summarize the recent literature on POEM in patients with achalasia and SED. The current article is largely focused on the new developments and findings, extended applications, and long-term outcomes of POEM in patients with achalasia and SED.

Recent findings

POEM is a safe and effective therapy for patients with achalasia and SED. POEM is comparable to Heller myotomy (HM) in terms of safety, efficacy, and complications, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Outcomes of POEM are excellent even in patients who had prior failed therapies for achalasia, including failed HM and prior POEM. Recent data also suggest the efficacy and safety of POEM in both pediatric and geriatric patients. GERD after POEM is common, and the majority of patients are asymptomatic. The management, goals of therapy, and long-term outcomes of GERD after POEM are unclear. Objective testing for all patients is recommended.

Summary

POEM is a validated treatment for all patients with achalasia and SED. Candidates should be carefully selected and appropriately counseled on expected outcomes and the need for long-term surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance ••Of major importance

  1. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilding J, Woo V, Rohwedder K, Sugg JPS. Etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia: the current understanding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1404–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S. Motor disorders of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(4):184–92. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197907263010404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Winter H, Shukla R, Elshaer M, Riaz A. Current management of achalasia—a review. Br J Med Pr. 2015;8(2):810.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, et al. Submucosal endoscopic oesophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy. 2007;39(09):761–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-966764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for oesophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:25–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stavropoulos SN, Desilets DJ, Fuchs K-H, Gostout CJ, Haber G, Inoue H, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2014;80(1):1–15. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016510714013492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boeckxstaens G, Annese V, Des Varannes S, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Cuttitta A, et al. European achalasia trial I (2011) pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1807–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1010502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iqbal A, Tierney B, Haider M, Salinas V, Karu A, Turaga K, et al. Laparoscopic re-operation for failed Heller myotomy. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):193–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00564.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen RP, Pellegrini CA. Revisional surgery after Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(5):321–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181f39fdb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fumagalli U, Rosati R, De Pascale S, Porta M, Carlani E, Pestalozza A, et al. Repeated surgical or endoscopic myotomy for recurrent dysphagia in patients after previous myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(3):494–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-3031-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Onimaru M, Inoue H, Ikeda H, Yoshida A, Santi E, Sato H, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a viable option for failed surgical esophagocardiomyotomy instead of redo surgical Heller myotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou P, Li Q, Yao L, Xu M, Chen W, Cai M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for failed Heller myotomy: a prospective single center study. Endoscopy. 2013;45(3):161–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1326203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vigneswaran Y, Yetasook AK, Zhao JC, Denham W, Linn JG, Ujiki MB. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): feasible as reoperation following Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(6):1071–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2496-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Ujiki M, Patel LY, Bapaye A, Desai PN, et al. Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia after failed Heller myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(10):1531–1537. Largest comparative study on POEM between patients with and without prior HM that reported similar technical success, clinical success and AE rates between the two groups, but lower clinical success rates in the HM group. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.01.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grotenhuis B, Wijnhoven B, Myers J, Jamieson G, Devitt P, Watson DI. Reoperation for dysphagia after cardiomyotomy for achalasia. Am J Surg. 2007;194(5):678–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rakita S, Villadolid D, Kalipersad C, Thometz D, Rosemurgy A. Outcomes promote reoperative Heller myotomy for symptoms of achalasia. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2007;21(10):1709–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9226-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang L, Li Y. Recurrent achalasia treated with Heller myotomy: a review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(46):7122–6. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.7122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan SM, Wu JCY, Teoh AYB, Yip HC, Ng EKW, Lau JYW, et al. Comparison of early outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy to peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ujiki M, Yetasook A, Zapf M, Linn J, Carbray JDW. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013;154(4):893–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Q-L, Yao L-Q, Xu X-Y, Zhu J-Y, Xu M-D, Zhang Y-Q, et al. Repeat peroral endoscopic myotomy: a salvage option for persistent/recurrent symptoms. Endoscopy. 2016;48(2):134–40. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1393095.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. •• Tyberg A, Seewald S, Sharaiha R, Martinez G, Desai A, Kumta N, et al. A multicenter international registry of redo per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after failed POEM. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(6):1208–1211. Largest study on patients who underwent redo POEM, reporting a clinical success rate of 85% after a mean follow up of 3 months. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boeckxstaens G, Zaninotto G, Richter J. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014;383(9911):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60651-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gennaro N, Portale G, Gallo C, Al E. Esophageal achalasia in the Veneto region: epidemiology and treatment. Epidemiology and treatment of achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(3):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1392-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li C-J, Tan Y-Y, Wang X-H, Liu D-L. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in patients aged ≥ 65 years. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(30):0175–9181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang X, Ren Y, Gao Q, Huang S, Zhou J, Zhang X, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is safe and effective in achalasia patients aged older than 60 years compared with younger patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(12):2407–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. ••Chen Y-I, Inoue H, Ujiki M, Draganov P., Colavita P, Mion F, et al. An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians. Gastrointest Endosc. 16AD. Largest study on POEM in geriatric population that reported a clinical success rate of 90.8% after a median follow up of 256 days.

  28. Familiari P, Marchese M, Gigante G, Boskoski I, Tringali A, Perri V, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(6):794–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a803f7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen W, Li Q, Zhou P, Yao L, Xu M, Zhang Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in pediatric patients: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li C, Tan Y, Wang X, Liu D. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):201–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Darisetty S, Kotla R, Kalapala R, et al. Per oral endoscopic myotomy in children with achalasia cardia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(4):613–9. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm15172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Miao S, Wu J, Lu J, Wang Y, Tang Z, Zhou Y, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with achalasia: a relatively long-term single-center study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;

  33. •Caldaro T, Familiari P, Francesca E, Gigante G, Marchese M, Chiara A, et al. Treatment of esophageal achalasia in children: today and tomorrow. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;(50):726–30. Comparative study between POEM vs HM in pediatric patients that reported a shorter operative time, faster time to feeding and more rapid discharge in the POEM group.

  34. • Tan Y, Zhu H, Li C, Chu Y, Huo J, Liu D. Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic balloon dilation for primary treatment of pediatric achalasia. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(10):1613–1618. Comparative study between POEM and PBD in pediatric patients that reported a better intermediate and long term clinical success rates in the POEM group. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pehlivanov N, Pasricha P. Achalasia: Botox, dilatation or laparoscopic surgery in 2006. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(9):799–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00802.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Henriquez A, Cortés C. Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia. Gut. 1989;30(3):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.30.3.299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang L, Li Y, Li L. Meta-analysis of randomized and controlled treatment trials for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(11):2303–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0637-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tack J, Zaninotto G. Therapeutic options in oesophageal dysphagia. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(6):332–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumagai K, Tsai J, Thorell A, Lundell L, Håkanson B. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Are results comparable to laparoscopic Heller myotomy? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(5):505–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2014.934915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumbhari V, Tieu A, Onimaru M, El Zein M, Teitelbaum E, Ujiki M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Teitelbaum E, Soper N, Pandolfino J, Kahrilas P, Hirano I, Boris L, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):522–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3733-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bhayani N, Kurian A, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Reider E, Swanstrom LL. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1098–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hungness E, Teitelbaum E, Santos B. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):228–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2030-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. •• Awaiz A, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon B, Memon MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(3):123–131. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing POEM vs HM in 483 patients. This study reported a similar risk of GERD, length of stay in the hospital, AE rate and postoperative pain score between the two groups, but higher clinical failure rate in the HM group. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Eckardt A, Eckardt V. Treatment and surveillance strategies in achalasia: an update. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(6):311–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hong D, Pescarus R, Khan R, Ambrosini L, Anvari M, Cadeddu M. Early clinical experience with the POEM procedure for achalasia. Can J Surg. 2015;58(6):389–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jia G, Shan H, Zhang D, Wu L, Zhu L. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia of cardia: analysis of 7 cases. Chinese J Gastroenterol. 2014;19:232–4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lu B. Curative effect and security analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy in treatment of 20 cases of achalasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;28:487.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tan Y, Liu D, Zhang J, Li C, Duan T, Zhou J, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a comparative study of simple longitudinal mucosal incision and modified incision. World Chinese J Dig. 2014;22(27):4129–34. https://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v22.i27.4129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tang X, Gong W, Deng Z, Zhou J, Ren Y, Zhang Q, et al. Usefulness of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in children: experience from a single center. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015;31(7):633–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3717-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ling T, Guo H, Yang T, Peng C, Zou X, Shi RH. Effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: a pilot trial in Chinese Han population with a minimum of one-year follow-up. J Dig Dis. 2014;15(7):352–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang J, Tan N, Xiao Y, Chen J, Chen B, Ma Z, et al. Safety and efficacy of the modified peroral endoscopic myotomy with shorter myotomy for achalasia patients: a prospective study. Dis Esophagus. 2015;28(8):720–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yaqi Z, Enqiang L, Huikai L, Zhichu Q, Xiangdong W, Hong D, et al. Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy with transverse entry incision versus longitudinal entry incision for achalasia. J SouthernMedical Univ. 2013;33:1399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Li Q, Chen W, Zhou P, Yao LQ, Xu MD, Hu JW, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a clinical comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):442–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ma R-X. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: analysis of 58 cases. World Chinese J Dig. 2014;22(21):3095–9. https://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v22.i21.3095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen X, Li Q, Ji G, Ge X, Zhang X, Zhao X, et al. Two-year follow-up for 45 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(5):890–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. von Rahden B, Filser J, Reimer S, Inoue H, Germer C. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Literature review and own initial experience. Der Chir Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der Oper Medizen. 2014;85:420–32.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Von Renteln D, Fuchs K, Fockens P, Bauerfeind P, Vassiliou M, Werner Y, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(2):309–11. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Darisetty S, Kotla R, Chavan R, Kalpala R, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Costamagna G, Marchese M, Familiari P, Tringali A, Inoue H, Perri V. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for oesophageal achalasia: preliminary results in humans. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44(10):827–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2012.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Minami H, Isomoto H, Yamaguchi N, Ohnita K, Takeshima F, Inoue H, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for diffuse esophageal spasm. Endoscopy. 2014;46:E79–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Sato C, Minami H, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):256–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M, Boskoski I, Tringali A, Perri V, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):82–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lee BH, Shim KY, Hong S, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia: initial results of a Korean study. Clin Endosc. 2013;46(2):161–7. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.2.161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Akpinar Z, Alper E, et al. The last innovation in achalasia treatment; per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015;26:218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Friedel D, Modayil R, Iqbal S, Grendell J, Stavropoulos S. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: an American perspective. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5(9):420–7. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Jones E, Meara M, Pittman M, Hazey J, Perry K. Prior treatment does not influence the performance or early outcome of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1282–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4339-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Khashab MA, El Zein M, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong SBS, Abdelgalil AMA, Saxena P, et al. Comprehensive analysis of efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy performed by a gastroenterologist in the endoscopy unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(1):117–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Orenstein S, Raigani S, Wu Y, Pauli E, Phillips M, Ponsky J, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic or surgical therapy. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:272.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sharata A, Dunst C, Pescarus R, Shlomovitz E, Wille A, Reavis K, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(1):161–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2610-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Teitelbaum E, Soper N, Santos B, Arafat F, Pandolfino J, Kahrilas P, et al. Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(12):3359–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3628-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Worrell S, Alicuben E, Boys J, DeMeester S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in a thoracic surgical practice. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yang D, Pannu D, Zhang Q, White J, Draganov P. Evaluation of anesthesia management, feasibility and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia performed in the endoscopy unit. Endosc Int. 2015;3:289–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Chiu P, Wu J, Teoh A, Chan Y, Wong S, Liu S, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia: from bench to bedside (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016;48(12):1059–68. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Khajanchee Y, Kanneganti S, Leatherwood A, Hansen P, Swanström L. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication: outcomes predictors in 121 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140(9):827–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.9.827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Molena D, Portale G, Costantino M, Nicoletti LAE. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal achalasia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11(6):351–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/10926420152761860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Patti MG, Pellegrini CA, Horgan S, Arcerito M. Minimally invasive surgery for achalasia: an 8-year experience with 168 patients. Ann Surg. 1999;230(4):587–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199910000-00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ren Z, Zhong Y, Author PZ, Xu M, Cai M, Li L, et al. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3267–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2336-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Talukdar R, Inoue HNRD. Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(11):3030–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4040-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Khashab M, Messallam A, Onimaru M, Teitelbaum E, Ujiki M, Gitelis M, et al. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(5):1170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M, Boskoski I, Tringali A, Perri V, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):82–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Chai N, Zhang X, Xiong Y, Ding H, Feng J, Li Y, et al. Ling classification applied in the preoperative safety and effectiveness assessment of POEM. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2017;31(1):368–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4981-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. El Khoury R, Teitelbaum E, Sternbach J, Soper N, Harmath C, Pandolfino J, et al. Evaluation of the need for routine esophagram aft er peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2969–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4585-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Cai M, Zhou P, Yao L, Xu M, Zhong Y, Li Q, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for idiopathic achalasia: randomized comparison of water-jet assisted versus conventional dissection technique. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(4):1158–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3300-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Tang X, Ren Y, Wei Z, Zhou J, Deng Z, Chen Z, et al. Factors predicting the technical difficulty of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2015;30:3774–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wang X, Tan Y, Zhang J, Liu D. Risk factors for gas-related complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia. Neth J Med. 2015;73(2):76–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Stavropoulos S, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Savidas T. The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2013;27(9):3322–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2913-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Cotton PB, Eisen G, Aabakken L, Baron T, Hutter MM, Jacobson B, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):446–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Yang S, Zeng MS, Zhang Z, et al. Pneumomediastinum and pneumoperitoneum on computed tomography after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): postoperative changes or complications? Acta Radiol. 2015;56(10):1216–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114551399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Werner YB, von Renteln D, Noder T, Schachschal G, Denzer UW, Groth S, et al. Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(4):708–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Zhang X-C, Li Q-L, Xu M-D, Chen S-Y, Zhong Y-S, Zhang Y-Q, et al. Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy. 2016;48(11):967–78. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. •• Haito-Chavez Y, Inoue H, Beard KW, Draganov PV, Ujiki M, Rahden BHA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with per oral endoscopic myotomy in 1826 patients: an international multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(8):1267–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.139. Largest study on POEM AEs in 1826 patients. The overall reported prevalence of AE was 7.5%, but only 0.5% were severe.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Patel K, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Markar S, Kumar S, Jethwa P, Zaninotto G. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(7):807–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Werner YB, Costamagna G, Swanström LL, Von Renteln D, Familiari P, Sharata AM, et al. Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Endoscopy. 2016;65:899–906.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. • Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Chiu PW-Y, Yip HC, Bapaye A, Ujiki M, et al. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(5):927–933.e2. A large multicenter study that included 205 patients who underwent POEM with reported clinical success rate of 91% after a mean follow up of 31 months. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Guo H, Yang H, Zhang X, Wang L, Lv Y, Zou X, et al. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective single-center study. Dis Esophagus [Internet]. 2017;30(5):1–6. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/dote/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/dote/dow011 . https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dow011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Hungness E, Sternbach J, Teitelbaum E, Kahrilas P, Pandolfino J, Soper N. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after the learning curve durable long-term results with a low complication rate. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):508–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. ••Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, Sharata AM, Ward MA, DeMeester SR, et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5699-2. First study to report POEM outcomes with a mean follow-up time of 5 years, with a clinical success rate of 83%. They reported an improvement in the mean Eckardt scores at 6 months and 2 years, but there was a small but significant worsening of Eckardt scores at 5 years, emphasizing the importance of long-term follow-up in all patients.

  100. Moonen A, Annese V, Belmans A, Bredenoord A, Bruley des Varannes S, Costantini M, et al. Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Gut. 2016:732–9.

  101. Swanstrom L, Kurian A, Dunst, Christy M, Sharata A, Bhayani N, et al. Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg. 2012;257(4):659–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Familiari P, Greco S, Gigante G, Calì A, Boškoski I, Onder G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: analysis of clinical, procedural and functional factors, associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Stavropoulos S, Modayil R, Friedel D, Savidas T. The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3322–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2913-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M, Boskoski I, Bove V, Tringali A, et al. EndoFLIP system for the intraoperative evaluation of peroral endoscopic myotomy. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2014;2(2):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640614521193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Rawlings A, Soper NJ, Oelschlager B, Swanstrom L, Matthews BD, Pellegrini C, et al. Laparoscopic Dor versus Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1822-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Burdiles P, Korn O, Csendes P, Henríquez A. Very late results of esophagomyotomy for patients with achalasia: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and acid reflux studies in 67 patients for a mean follow-up of 190 months. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):196–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000197469.12632.e0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed Building, Suite 7125B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Nasim Parsa MD & Mouen A. Khashab MD

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Harbor Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Nasim Parsa MD

Authors
  1. Nasim Parsa MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mouen A. Khashab MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouen A. Khashab MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Nasim Parsa declares no conflict of interest.

Mouen A. Khashab is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus America. He also serves on the medical advisory board of Boston Scientific and Olympus America.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Esophagus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parsa, N., Khashab, M.A. POEM in the Treatment of Esophageal Disorders. Curr Treat Options Gastro 16, 27–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0168-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0168-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation