Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Guidelines in Cardio-Oncology: The Balance Between Evidence and Expert Opinion

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

While expert opinion is an important tool in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), it must be used judiciously and balanced with the available evidence. In this review, we carefully examine the role of balancing evidence and expert opinion in the context of the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Cardio-Oncology guidelines, including the factors that influence the weight given to expert opinion and potential impact on health care systems adhering to specific guideline recommendations.

Recent findings

In an attempt to be all-encompassing, the 2022 ESC guidelines risk diluting important recommendations with low-quality recommendations lacking consensus. Adherence to, as well as deviation from, guidelines may have important unintended consequences to stakeholders.

Summary

The 2022 ESC guidelines should be viewed as a catalyst for the cardio-oncology community to generate higher quality evidence to address existing gaps in knowledge while also recognizing the current constraints in providing care to patients with cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, Boriani G, Cardinale D, Cordoba R, Cosyns B. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) developed by the task force on cardio-oncology of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2022;43(41):4229–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lohr KN, Field MJ. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Natl Acad Press. 1990;90.

  3. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342(8883):1317–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinberg E, Greenfield S, Wolman DM, Mancher M, Graham R. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust: national academies press. 2011.

  5. Group E-BMW Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420–2425.

  6. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;390(10092):415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Plana J, Galderisi M, Barac A, Ewer M, Ky B, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Ganame J, Sebag I, Agler D, Badano L, et al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:1063–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Virani SA, Dent S, Brezden-Masley C, Clarke B, Davis MK, Jassal DS, Johnson C, Lemieux J, Paterson I, Sebag IA. Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for evaluation and management of cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(7):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zamorano J, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Munoz D, Aboyans V, Asteggiano R, Galderisi M, Habib G, Lenihan D, Lip G, Lyon A, et al. 2016 ESC Position Paper cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2768–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Armenian SH, Lacchetti C, Barac A, Carver J, Constine LS, Denduluri N, Dent S, Douglas PS, Durand J-B, Ewer M. Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(8):893–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Curigliano G, Lenihan D, Fradley M, Ganatra S, Barac A, Blaes A, Herrmann J, Porter C, Lyon A, Lancellotti P. Management of cardiac disease in cancer patients throughout oncological treatment: ESMO consensus recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(2):171–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexandre J, Cautela J, Ederhy S, Damaj GL, Salem JE, Barlesi F, Farnault L, Charbonnier A, Mirabel M, Champiat S. Cardiovascular toxicity related to cancer treatment: a pragmatic approach to the American and European cardio-oncology guidelines. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(18): e018403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rassaf T, Totzeck M, Backs J, Bokemeyer C, Hallek M, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hochhaus A, Lüftner D, Müller OJ, Neudorf U. Onco-cardiology: consensus paper of the German cardiac society, the German society for pediatric cardiology and congenital heart defects and the German society for hematology and medical oncology. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:1197–222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fanaroff AC, Califf RM, Windecker S, Smith SC, Lopes RD. Levels of evidence supporting American College of Cardiology/American heart association and European Society of cardiology guidelines, 2008–2018. JAMA. 2019;321(11):1069–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, Irvine J, Levine M, Levine M, Nishikawa J. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268(17):2420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, Schünemann HJ. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. • Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527–30. This paper reviews the unintended consequencs of clinical practice guidelines.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh S-W, Lee HJ, Chin HJ, Hwang J-I. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines and outcomes in diabetic patients. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23(4):413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, Crumb SR, Dearani JA, Fuller S, Gurvitz M. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(12):e81–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH. Abboud P-AC, Rubin HR: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?: a framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8):868–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Angeli F, Reboldi G, Trapasso M, Aita A, Verdecchia P. Managing hypertension in 2018 which guideline to follow? Heart Asia. 2019;11(1).

  23. Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, Lacchetti C, Adkins S, Anadkat M, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, Chau I. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(36):4073–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, Andrews S, Armand P, Bhatia S, Budde LE, Costa L, Davies M, Dunnington D. NCCN guidelines insights: management of immunotherapy-related toxicities, version 1.2020 featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(3):230–241.

  25. Brahmer JR, Abu-Sbeih H, Ascierto PA, Brufsky J, Cappelli LC, Cortazar FB, Gerber DE, Hamad L, Hansen E, Johnson DB. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(6).

  26. Rini BI, Moslehi JJ, Bonaca M, Schmidinger M, Albiges L, Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Atkins MB, Haanen J, Mariani M. Prospective cardiovascular surveillance of immune checkpoint inhibitor–based combination therapy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: data from the Phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(17):1929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waliany S, Neal JW, Reddy S, Wakelee H, Shah SA, Srinivas S, Padda SK, Fan AC, Colevas AD, Wu SM. Myocarditis surveillance with high-sensitivity troponin I during cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cardio Oncology. 2021;3(1):137–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee Chuy K, Oikonomou EK, Postow MA, Callahan MK, Chapman PB, Shoushtari AN, Neilan TG, Fradley MG, Ramanathan LV, Wolchok JD. Myocarditis surveillance in patients with advanced melanoma on combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. Oncologist. 2019;24(5):e196–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S, Young T, Louw Q, Ochodo E, Grimmer K. Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(1):122–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7183):593–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. International CardioOncology Society

  32. Koop Y, Teske AJ, Wanders I, Meijer H, Kaanders J, Manintveld OC, Hassing HC, Vermeulen H, Maas AH, van Spronsen D-J. Future steps in cardio-oncology—a national multidisciplinary survey among healthcare professionals in the Netherlands. J Cancer Surviv. 2022:1–8.

  33. Prasad P, Branch M, Asemota D, Elsayed R, Addison D, Brown S-A. Cardio-oncology preventive care: racial and ethnic disparities. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2020;14:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cousin L, Roper N, Nolan T. Cardio-oncology health disparities: social determinants of health and care for Black breast cancer survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021;25(5):36–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ohman RE, Yang EH, Abel ML. Inequity in cardio-oncology: identifying disparities in cardiotoxicity and links to cardiac and cancer outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(24):e023852.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(2):181–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Haycox A, Bagust A, Walley T. Clinical guidelines—the hidden costs. BMJ. 1999;318(7180):391–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Anderson JL, Heidenreich PA, Barnett PG, Creager MA, Fonarow GC, Gibbons RJ, Halperin JL, Hlatky MA, Jacobs AK, Mark DB. ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(22):2329–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020 GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.

  40. • Ehrhardt MJ, Ward ZJ, Liu Q, Chaudhry A, Nohria A, Border W, Fulbright JM, Mulrooney DA, Oeffinger KC, Nathan PC. Cost-effectiveness of the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group screening guidelines to prevent heart failure in survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(33):3851. This study highlights the role of cost-effectiveness analyses in developing screening strategies in childhood cancer survivors.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ehrhardt MJ, Leerink JM, Mulder RL, Mavinkurve-Groothuis A, Kok W, Nohria A, Nathan PC, Merkx R, de Baat E, Asogwa OA. Systematic review and updated recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol. 2023.

  42. Tolaney SM, Barry WT, Dang CT, Yardley DA, Moy B, Marcom PK, Albain KS, Rugo HS, Ellis M, Shapira I. Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):134–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. van Ramshorst MS, van der Voort A, van Werkhoven ED, Mandjes IA, Kemper I, Dezentje VO, Oving IM, Honkoop AH, Tick LW, van de Wouw AJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in the presence of dual HER2 blockade for HER2-positive breast cancer (TRAIN-2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1630–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim S-B, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, Ciruelos E, Ferrero J-M, Schneeweiss A, Heeson S. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):724–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lyon AR, Dent S, Stanway S, Earl H, Brezden-Masley C, Cohen-Solal A, Tocchetti CG, Moslehi JJ, Groarke JD, Bergler-Klein J. Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment in cancer patients scheduled to receive cardiotoxic cancer therapies: a position statement and new risk assessment tools from the C ardio-O ncology S tudy G roup of the H eart F ailure A ssociation of the E uropean S ociety of C ardiology in collaboration with the I nternational C ardio-O ncology S ociety. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(11):1945–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J, Long JB, Hurria A, Owusu C, Steingart RM, Gross CP. Incidence of heart failure or cardiomyopathy after adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2504–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim EK, Cho J, Kim J-Y, Chang S-A, Park S-J, Choi JO, Lee SC, Ahn JS, Park SW, Im Y-H. Early decline in left ventricular ejection fraction can predict trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer: a study using 13 years of registry data. Cancer Research and Treatment: Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association. 2019;51(2):727–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, De Azambuja E, Procter M, Suter TM, Jackisch C, Cameron D, Weber HA, Heinzmann D. 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2013;382(9897):1021–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu AF, Dang CT, Jorgensen J, Moskowitz CS, DeFusco P, Oligino E, Oeffinger KC, Liu JE, Steingart RM. Rationale and design of a cardiac safety study for reduced cardiotoxicity surveillance during HER2-targeted therapy. Cardio-Oncology. 2023;9(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Minasian LM, Dimond E, Davis M, Adhikari B, Fagerstrom R, Fabian C, Floyd J, Unger JM, Douglas PS, Mustian KM. The evolving design of NIH-funded cardio-oncology studies to address cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. Cardio Oncology. 2019;1(1):105–13.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shelburne N, Adhikari B, Brell J, Davis M, Desvigne-Nickens P, Freedman A, Minasian L, Force T, Remick SC. Cancer treatment–related cardiotoxicity: current state of knowledge and future research priorities. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(9).

  52. Shelburne N, Simonds NI, Adhikari B, Alley M, Desvigne-Nickens P, Dimond E, Filipski K, Gallicchio L, Minasian L. Changing hearts and minds: improving outcomes in cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. • Adhikari BB, Shi S, Dimond EP, Shelburne N, Desvigne-Nickens P, Minasian LM. Spectrum of national institutes of health-funded research in cardio-oncology: a basic, clinical, and observational science perspective. Heart Fail Clin. 2022;18(3):515–28. This paper outlines the past, present, and future of collobarative research in cardio-oncology and highlights the role of NIH-funded initiatives in the field.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Brown S-A, Beavers C, Martinez HR, Marshall CH, Olaye IM, Guha A, Cho D, Bailey A, Bergom C, Bansal N. Bridging the gap to advance the care of individuals with cancer: collaboration and partnership in the Cardiology Oncology Innovation Network (COIN). Cardio-oncology. 2022;8(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Asteggiano R, Aboyans V, Lee G, Salinger S, Richter D. Cardiology care delivered to cancer patients: the results of a questionnaire survey by the Council for Cardio Oncology and Council for Cardiology Practice of the European Society of Cardiology. In.: Oxford University Press; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Lancellotti P, Suter TM, Lopez-Fernandez T, Galderisi M, Lyon AR, Van der Meer P, Cohen Solal A, Zamorano J-L, Jerusalem G, Moonen M. Cardio-oncology services: rationale, organization, and implementation: a report from the ESC Cardio-Oncology council. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(22):1756–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Alvarez-Cardona JA, Ray J, Carver J, Zaha V, Cheng R, Yang E, Mitchell JD, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Kondapalli L, Dent S. Cardio-oncology education and training: JACC council perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(19):2267–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors contributed significantly to the preparation of the manuscript. Writing original draft and literature review: DL. Critical appraisal, review and editing: RC, EM, EC, WG, MA, and RK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas J. Leedy MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Eric J. Chow reports grants from Abbot Laboratories, outside of the submitted work. Douglas J. Leedy declares that he has no conflict of interest. Marta Alhama-Belotto declares that she has no conflict of interest. William R Gwin III declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ruchi Kapoor declares that she has no conflict of interest. Elina Minami declares that she has no conflict of interest. Richard K. Cheng declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leedy, D.J., Alhama-Belotto, M., Gwin, W.R. et al. Guidelines in Cardio-Oncology: The Balance Between Evidence and Expert Opinion. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 25, 639–654 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-01014-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-01014-2

Keywords

Navigation