Skip to main content
Log in

Current Treatment Options of Fontan Arrhythmias: Etiology, Incidence, and Diagnosis

  • Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (G Singh, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the review

Patients who undergo single ventricle palliation with a Fontan are at a high risk for developing arrhythmias. This review will address our understanding of pathophysiology, incidence, presentation, and type of arrhythmia, focusing on recent developments.

Recent findings

Patients with the initially described atriopulmonary connection type of Fontan have a high incidence of arrhythmias, with severe consequences. Arrhythmias are less of a problem with the two currently used surgical techniques, the lateral tunnel and the extracardiac conduit Fontan, with the extracardiac Fontan being potentially less arrhythmogenic in the long term.

Summary

There is no role for the atriopulmonary Fontan any longer. As the lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit patients age, there will be a greater understanding of the unique complications specific to their unique anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Quinton E, Nightingale P, Hudsmith L, Thorne S, Marshall H, Clift P, et al. Prevalence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in adults after Fontan operation. Heart. 2015;101:1672–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gewillig M, Wyse R, de Leval M, Deanfield J. Early and late arrhythmias after the Fontan operation: predisposing factors and clinical consequences. Br Heart J. 1992;67:72–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters N, Somerville J. Arrhythmias after the Fontan procedure. Br Heart J. 1992;68:199–204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis M, Zannino D, du Plessis K, Bullock A, Disney P, Radford D, et al. Clinical outcomes in adolescent and adults after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):1009–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. • Gelatt M, Hamilton R, McCrindle B, Gow R, Williams W, Trusler G, et al. Risk factors for atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1735–41 A study of a cohort of 270 patients at the Hospital for Sick Children focusing on the incidence and risk factors for atrial tachyarrhythmias. The authors note that the overall incidence of arrhythmia was 20% and noted to be higher in patients with more extensive atrial surgery or manipulation which occurred more commonly in the atriopulmonary subtype.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Azakie A, McCrindle B, Van Arsdell G, Benson L, Coles J, Hamilton R, et al. Extracardiac conduit versus lateral tunnel cavopulmonary connections at a single institution: impact on outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1219–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Rubinstein C, Simsic J, Taylor A, Saul P, Bradley S. Lateral tunnel versus extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure: a concurrent comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1389–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nurnberg J, Ovroutski S, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Ewert P, Hetzer R, Lange P, et al. New onset arrhythmias after the extracardiac conduit Fontan operation compared with the intraatrial lateral tunnel procedure: early and midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1979–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giannico S, Hammad F, Amodeo A, Michielon G, Drago F, Turchetta A, et al. Clinical outcome of 193 extracardiac Fontan patients: the first 15 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2065–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fiore A, Turrentine M, Rodefeld M, Vijay P, Schwartz T, Virgo K, et al. Fontan operation: a comparison of lateral tunnel with extracardiac conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:622–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Keak J, Min S, Kim W, Kim Y, et al. Comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:328–30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakano T, Kado H, Tachibana T, Hinokiyama K, Shiose A, Kajimoto M, et al. Excellent midterm outcome of extracardiac conduit total cavopulmonary connection: results of 126 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1619–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ocello S, Salviato N, Marceletti C. Results of 100 consecutive extracardiac conduit Fontan operations. Pediatr Cardiol. 2007;28:433–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim S, Kim W, Lim H, Lee J. Outcome of 200 patients after an extracardiac Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:108–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. •• Stephenson E, Lu M, Berul C, Etheridge S, Idriss S, Margossian R, et al. Arrhythmias in a contemporary Fontan cohort. Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:890–6 A large multicenter cohort of 520 patients using the Pediatric Heart Network data, evaluating the prevalence of tachyarrhythmia and factors that affect the timing of arrhythmia development. Overall prevalence was 7.2% and patients with an atriopulmonary subtype of Fontan were at an increased risk of developing a tachyarrhythmia; however, the follow-up time with this subtype of Fontan was longer as it was an older technique.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miyazaki A, Sakaguchi H, Ohuchi H, Yamada O, Kitano M, Yazaki S, et al. The clinical course and incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after extra-cardiac conduit Fontan procedure in relation to an atrial situs. Circ J. 2011;75:413–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. •• Balaji S, Daga A, Bradley DJ, Etheridge SP, Law IH, Batra AS, et al. An international multicenter study comparing arrhythmia prevalence between the intracardiac lateral tunnel and the extracardiac conduit type of Fontan operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(2):576–81. A large multicenter study of 1271 patients comparing the intracardiac lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit type of Fontan with reference to early and late clinical brady and tachyarrhythmia. Bradycardia defined as need for pacing. While on face of it there was a higher incidence of late tachyarrhythmias in the ILT group, the time based analysis (Kaplan-Meier curve) showed no difference.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lasa J, Glatz A, Daga A, Shah M. Prevalence of arrhythmias late after the Fontan operation. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1184.

    Google Scholar 

  19. d’Udekem Y, Iyengar A, Galati J, Forsdick V, Weintraub R, Wheaton G, et al. Redefining expectations of long-term survival after the Fontan procedure. Circulation. 2014;130(suppl 1):S32–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. •• Carins T, Shi W, Iyengar A, Nisbet A, Forsdick V, Zannino D, et al. Long-term outcomes after first-onset arrhythmia in Fontan physiology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1355–63 A retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 1034 patients from the Australian and New Zealand Fontan Registry. Authors describe predictors of developing arrhythmias to aid early detection and additionally demonstrate the prevalence of adverse long-term outcomes associated following the onset of an arrhythmia. Authors note that survival following the onset of arrhythmias was surprisingly good with 67% post-tachyarrhythmia and 84% post-bradyarrhythmia; however, there was a significant burden of Fontan failure within 10 years of the onset arrhythmias.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Egbe A, Connolly H, Khan A, Niaz T, Said S, Dearani J, et al. Outcomes in adult Fontan patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias. Am Heart J. 2017;186:12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. •• Poh C, Zannino D, Weintraub R, Winlaw D, Grigg L, Cordina R, et al. Three decades later: the fate of the population of patients who underwent the atriopulmonary Fontan procedure. Int J Cardiol. 2017;231(1):99–104 A retrospective analysis of 215 patients in the Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry who had undergone the Atriopulmonary Fontan surgery and evaluating their outcome up to 40 years following their procedure. Found that arrhythmias are a significant burden with 80% of patients having an arrhythmia by 28 years post-procedure. Atrial arrhythmias also increased the risk of Fontan failure, transplantation and death.

    Google Scholar 

  23. •• Pundi K, Pundi K, Johnson J, Dearani J, Li Z, et al. Sudden cardiac death and late arrhythmias after the Fontan operation. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(1):17–23 A large singl- center Mayo clinic study of 996 patients showed that freedom from arrhythmia was 24% at 30 years after the Fontan.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marathe SP, Zannino D, Cao JY, et al. Heterotaxy is not a risk factor for adverse long-term outcomes after Fontan completion [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 28]. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;S0003–4975(19):31974–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. de Leval M, Kilner P, Gewillig M, Bull C. Total cavopulmonary connection: A logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection of complex Fontan operations. Experimental studies and early clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:682–95.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cecchin F, Johnsrude C, Perry J, Friedman R. Effect of age and surgical technique on symptomatic arrhythmias after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;76:386–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. de Leval M. The Fontan circulation: what have we learned? What to expect? Pediatr Cardiol. 1998;19:316–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marcelletti C, Corno A, Giannico S, Marino B. Inferior vena cava-pulmonary artery extracardiac conduit. A new form of right heat bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;100:228–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Backer C, Mavroudis C. 149 Fontan conversions. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2019;15(2):105–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rijnberg F, Blom N, Sojak V, Bruggemans E, Kuipers I, Rammeloo L, et al. A 45-year experience with the Fontan procedure: tachyarrhythmia, an important sign of adverse outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;29:461–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ohuchi H. Adult patients with Fontan circulation: What we know and how to manage adults with Fontan circulation? J Cardiol. 2016;63(3):181–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pundi K, Johnson J, Dearani J, Pundi K, Li Z, Hinck C, et al. 40-year follow-up after the Fontan operation: long-term outcomes of 1052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(15):1700–10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moore BM, Anderson R, Nisbet AM, Kalla M, du Plessis K, d’Udekem Y, et al. Ablation of atrial arrhythmias after the atriopulmonary Fontan procedure: mechanisms of arrhythmia and outcomes. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;(10):1338–46.

  34. Deal B, Mavroudis C, Backer C. Arrhythmia management in the Fontan patient. Pediatr Cardiol. 2007;28:448–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. •• Rychik J, Atz A, Celermajer D, Deal B, Gatzoulis M, Gewillig M, et al. Evaluation and management of the child and adult with Fontan circulation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;140(6):234–84 This manuscript is released by the American Heart Association as a review of the current literature regarding the physiological challenges and management considerations for children and adults with the Fontan circulation, along with a consideration of the gaps in the current knowledge and guide for future research.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stout K, Daniels C, Aboulhosn J, Bozkurt B, Broberg C, Colman J, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:698–800.

    Google Scholar 

  37. •• Khairy P, Van Hare GF, Balaji S, Berul CI, Cecchin F, Cohen MI, et al. PACES/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the recognition and management of arrhythmias in adult congenital heart disease: developed in partnership between the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of PACES, HRS, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD). Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(10):e102–65 A thorough review released jointly by the Pediatric and Adult Congenital Electrophysiologic Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) regarding the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease.

    Google Scholar 

  38. • Barber B, Batra A, Burch G, Shen I, Ungerleider R, Brown J, et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of pacing in patients with Fontan physiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1937–42 A prospective study to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of pacing in Fontan patients. The authors note that compared with atrial or dual chamber pacing, ventricular pacing resulted in lower cardiac output, elevated left atrial pressure, elevated pulmonary arterial pressure, and decreased mean arterial pressure.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kotani Y, Chetan D, Zhu J, Saedi A, Zhao L, Mertens L, et al. Fontan failure and death in contemporary Fontan circulation: analysis from the last two decades. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1240–7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kverneland L, Kramer P, Ovroutski S. Five decades of the Fontan operation: a systematic review of international reports on outcomes after univentricular palliation. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;13:181–93.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Poh C, Hornung T, Celermajer D, Radford D, Justo R, Andrews D, et al. Modes of late mortality in patients with a Fontan circulation. Heart. 2020;0:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. •• Li D, Hirata Y, Ono M, An Q. Arrhythmia after Fontan operation with intraatrial lateral tunnel versus extra-cardiac conduit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38:873–80 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published studies comparing the intralateral tunnel and extracardiac Fontan operations in regard to incidence of early and late post-operative arrhythmias and placement of permanent pacemakers. The authors note that their meta-analysis shows no significant difference in regard to early arrhythmias or pacemaker placement. However, they do note an increased incidence of late arrhythmias in the ILT group, with the caveat that the extracardiac subtype of Fontan is the newer surgical technique with a relatively younger cohort and therefore the significant difference noted in the late arrhythmia incidence could change with time.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elias P, Poh C, du Plessis K, Zannino D, Rice K, Radford D, et al. Long-term outcomes of single-ventricle palliation for pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: Fontan survivors remain at risk of late myocardial ischaemia and death. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53:1230–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seshadri Balaji MBBS, MRCP (UK), PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Mayme Marshall, Mohammad Alnoor, and Seshadri Balaji declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alnoor, M., Marshall, M. & Balaji, S. Current Treatment Options of Fontan Arrhythmias: Etiology, Incidence, and Diagnosis. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 22, 53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00849-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00849-3

Keywords

Navigation