Opinion statement
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is indicated for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with a contraindication to or a failure of anticoagulation. With the advent of retrievable IVC filters and their ease of placement, an increasing number of such filters are being inserted for prophylaxis in patients at high risk for VTE. Available data show that only a small number of these filters are retrieved within the recommended period, if at all, prompting the FDA to issue a statement on the need for their timely removal. With prolonged dwell times, advanced techniques may be needed for filter retrieval in up to 60% of the cases. In this article, we review standard and advanced IVC filter retrieval techniques including single-access, dual-access, and dissection techniques. Complicated filter retrievals carry a non-negligible risk for complications such as filter fragmentation and resultant embolization of filter components, venous pseudoaneurysms or stenoses, and breach of the integrity of the caval wall. Careful pre-retrieval assessment of IVC filter position, any significant degree of filter tilting or of hook, and/or strut epithelialization and caval wall penetration by filter components should be considered using dedicated cross-sectional imaging for procedural planning. In complex cases, the risk for retrieval complications should be carefully weighed against the risks of leaving the filter permanently indwelling. The decision to remove an embedded IVC filter using advanced techniques should be individualized to each patient and made with caution, based on the patient’s age and existing comorbidities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Heit JA. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(3):370–2. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.162545.
Cushman M, Tsai AW, White RH, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Enright P, et al. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Am J Med. 2004;117(1):19–25. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.018.
Moore PS, Andrews JS, Craven TE, Davis RP, Corriere MA, Godshall CJ, et al. Trends in vena caval interruption. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(1):118–25. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.067. e3; discussion 25-6.
Garcia-Godoy F, Collins T, Sacks D, Vasas S, Sarani B. Retrieval of inferior vena cava filters after prolonged indwelling time. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(21):1953–5. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.526.
Angel LF, Tapson V, Galgon RE, Restrepo MI, Kaufman J. Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(11):1522–30.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.024.
FDA. Removing retrievable inferior vena cava filters: FDA safety communication http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/Date accessed November/5/2016.
Stein PD, Alnas M, Skaf E, Kayali F, Siddiqui T, Olson RE, et al. Outcome and complications of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94(8):1090–3. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.077.
• Sarosiek S, Crowther M, Sloan JM. Indications, complications, and management of inferior vena cava filters: the experience in 952 patients at an academic hospital with a level I trauma center. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):513–7. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.343. Important article highlighting the longitudinal experience with IVC filters in a relatively large study population.
Van Ha TG, Chien AS, Funaki BS, Lorenz J, Piano G, Shen M, et al. Use of retrievable compared to permanent inferior vena cava filters: a single-institution experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2007;31(2):308–15. doi:10.1007/s00270-007-9184-5.
Johnson MS, Nemcek AA, Benenati JF, Baumann DS, Dolmatch BL, Kaufman JA, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the retrievable option inferior vena cava filter: a United States prospective multicenter clinical study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8):1173–84. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.004.
Lyon SM, Riojas GE, Uberoi R, Patel J, Lipp MEB, Plant GR, et al. Short- and long-term retrievability of the Celect vena cava filter: results from a multi-institutional registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(11):1441–8. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.038.
Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB, Sing RF, Proctor MC, Becker D, et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the society of interventional radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(3):449–59. doi:10.1097/01.rvi.0000203418-39769.0d.
Kirilcuk NN, Herget EJ, Dicker RA, Spain DA, Hellinger JC, Brundage SI. Are temporary inferior vena cava filters really temporary? Am J Surg. 2005;190(6):864–70. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.009.
• Al-Hakim R, Kee ST, Olinger K, Lee EW, Moriarty JM, McWilliams JP. Inferior vena cava filter retrieval: effectiveness and complications of routine and advanced techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(6):933–9. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.019. Recent article comparing the effectiveness and complications of standard and advanced IVC filter retrieval techniques.
Stavropoulos SW, Solomon JA, Trerotola SO. Wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filters: imaging features and technique for removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(2):379–82. doi:10.1097/01.rvi.0000196354.45643.5a.
Iliescu B, Haskal ZJ. Advanced techniques for removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2011;35(4):741–50. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0205-z.
Van Ha TG, Vinokur O, Lorenz J, Regalado S, Zangan S, Piano G, et al. Techniques used for difficult retrievals of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 32 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(1):92–9. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.007.
Oh JC, Trerotola SO, Dagli M, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Itkin M, et al. Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with computed tomography findings indicating tenting or penetration of the inferior vena cava wall. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(1):70–4. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.09.021.
Kuo WT, Cupp JS, Louie JD, Kothary N, Hofmann LV, Sze DY, et al. Complex retrieval of embedded IVC filters: alternative techniques and histologic tissue analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35(3):588–97. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0175-1.
Kuo WT, Cupp JS. The excimer laser sheath technique for embedded inferior vena cava filter removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(12):1896–9. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.08.013.
• Kuo WT, Odegaard JI, Rosenberg JK, Hofmann LV, Kuo WT, Odegaard JI, et al. Excimer laser-assisted removal of embedded inferior vena cava filters: a single-center prospective study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(5):560–6. doi:10.1161/circinterventions.113.000665. Important prospective study assessing the use of the new laser-assisted IVC retrieval technique.
Saito N, Shimamoto T, Takeda T, Marui A, Kimura T, Ikeda T, et al. Excimer laser–assisted retrieval of Günther Tulip vena cava filters: a pilot study in a canine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(5):719–24. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.028.
Asch MR. Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology. 2002;225(3):835–44. doi:10.1148/radiol.2252011825.
Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Aladdin M, Spinosa DJ, Matsumoto AH, Angle JF. Difficult retrieval of a recovery IVC filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(6):645–7. doi:10.1097/01.rvi.0000127887.62434.a8.
Turba UC, Glaiberman C, Picus D, Arslan B, Angle JF, Matsumoto AH. Management of severe vena cava filter tilting: experience with bard G-2 filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(3):449–53. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.11.020.
Rubenstein L, Chun AK, Chew M, Binkert CA. Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18(10):1315–8. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.002.
Lynch FC. Balloon-assisted removal of tilted inferior vena cava filters with embedded tips. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(9):1210–4. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.06.022.
Yamagami T, Kato T, Nishimura T. Successful retrieval of a Gunther tulip vena cava filter with the assistance of a curved sheath introducer. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(12):1760–2. doi:10.1097/01.rvi.0000184533.08722.3b.
Yallampalli S, Irani Z, Kalva SP. Endovascular removal of a permanent “TrapEase” inferior vena cava filter. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;47(5):379–82. doi:10.1177/1538574413487437.
Stavropoulos SW, Dixon RG, Burke CT, Stavas JM, Shah A, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, et al. Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(9):1297–301. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012.
• Stavropoulos SW, Ge BH, Mondschein JI, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Sudheendra D, Trerotola SO. Retrieval of tip-embedded inferior vena cava filters by using the endobronchial forceps technique: experience at a single institution. Radiology. 2015;275(3):900–7. doi:10.1148/radiol.14141420. Important study assessing the new endobronchial foreceps-assisted IVC filter retrieval technique.
White S, Stavropoulos S. Retrieval of a wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filter using rigid bronchoscopy forceps. Semin Interv Radiol. 2007;24(1):015–9. doi:10.1055/s-2007-971191.
Avery A, Stephens M, Redmond K, Harper J. Initial experience using the rigid forceps technique to remove wall-embedded IVC filters. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015;59(3):306–11. doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12299.
Burke CT, Dixon RG, Stavas JM. Use of rigid bronchoscopic forceps in the difficult retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18(10):1319–23. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.06.033.
Kuo WT, Odegaard JI, Louie JD, Sze DY, Unver K, Kothary N, et al. Photothermal ablation with the excimer laser sheath technique for embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: initial results from a prospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(6):813–23. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.459.
Marquess JS, Burke CT, Beecham AH, Dixon RG, Stavas JM, Sag AA, et al. Factors associated with failed retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(9):1321–7. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.06.004.
Desjardins B, Kamath SH, Williams D. Fragmentation, embolization, and left ventricular perforation of a recovery filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8):1293–6. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.019.
Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg. 2003;69(8):654–9.
Nazzal M, Chan E, Nazzal M, Abbas J, Erikson G, Sediqe S, et al. Complications related to inferior vena cava filters: a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24(4):480–6. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.015.
Loehr SP, Hamilton C, Dyer R. Retrieval of entrapped guide wire in an IVC filter facilitated with use of a myocardial biopsy forceps and snare device. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(9):1116–8. doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61602-9.
• Abtahian F, Hawkins BM, Ryan DP, Cefalo P, Nasser NJ, MacKay C, et al. Inferior vena cava filter usage, complications, and retrieval rate in cancer patients. Am J Med. 2014;127(11):1111–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.025. Recent retrospective study assessing the complication and retrieval rates of IVC filters in a large tertiary referral center.
Group PS. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005;112(3):416–22. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512834.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Disease
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daye, D., Walker, T.G. Novel and Advanced Techniques for Complex IVC Filter Retrieval. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 19, 28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0529-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0529-3