Skip to main content
Log in

Palliative Care and Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure

  • Heart Failure (W Tang, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

The diagnosis of advanced heart failure (HF) is established in patients for whom symptoms are refractory to guideline-directed therapies. Palliative care (PC) is based on symptom management and support of the patient and family, making its integration into the care of those with advanced HF essential. Comorbidities including frailty, cognitive dysfunction, and depression are often under-recognized in patients with advanced HF and may correlate with outcomes. Decisions should be based on the patient’s values, goals agreed upon by the clinician with the patient, and what is medically reasonable. Palliative Care should be integrated to help with both palliation of symptoms and support for families and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as • Of importance •• Of outstanding importance

  1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Butler J, et al. ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128:e240–327. Summary of guideline-based therapy for the treatment of heart failure.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–e209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lund LH, Matthews J, Aaronson K. Patient selection for left ventricular assist devices. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(5):434–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller LW. Left ventricular assist devices are underutilized. Circulation. 2005;123(14):1552–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nohria A, Lewis E, Stevenson LW. Medical Management of Advanced Heart Failure. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287(5):628–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen LA et al. Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:1928–52. Most recent expert guidelines for decision-making in advanced HF. This is a comprehensive document summarizing recommendations on each of the key components.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodlin SJ, Quill TE, Arnold RM. Communication and Decision-Making About Prognosis in Heart Failure Care. J Cardiac Fail. 2008;14:106–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bekelman DB, Rumsfeld J, Havranek E. Symptom Burden, Depression, and Spiritual Well-Being: A Comparison of Heart Failure and Advanced Cancer Patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(5):592–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forest SJ, Bello R, Friedmann P, et al. Readmissions After Ventricular Assist Device: Etiologies, Patterns, and Days Out of Hospital. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1276–81. This paper investigates readmission patterns after LVAD implantation amongst a mixed cohort of LVAD patients. This group included destination therapy and bridge to transplant patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, Sutradhar SC, Anker SD, Cropp AB, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2006;113:1424–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE, Mancini DM. Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation. 1997;95:2660–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haga K, Murray S, Reid J, et al. Identifying community based chronic heart failure patients in the last year of life: a comparison of the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guide and the Seattle Heart Failure Model. Heart. 2012;98:579–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chyu J, Fonarow G, Tseng C, Horowich T. Four-Variable Risk Model in Men and Women With Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2014; 7:88-95. A new proposed model for prognostication in advanced HF.

  14. Afilalo J, Karunananthan S, Eisenberg MJ, et al. Role of Frailty in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1616–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, Maurer MS, Green P, Allen LA, et al. Frailty Assessment in the Cardiovascular Care of Older Adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(8):747–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan H, Kalogeropoulos AP, Georgiopoulo V, et al. Frailty and Risk for Heart Failure in Older Adults, the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Am Heart J. 2013;166(5):887–94. This paper identifies frailty as an independent risk factor for poor outcomes in older adults with cardiovascular disease.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pilotto A, Addante F, Franceschi M, et al. Multidimensional Prognostic Index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts short-term mortality in older patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3(1):14–20. Highlights the importance of the geriatric assessment tool in older adults with cardiovascular disease.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dodson JA, Truong T, Towle V, et al. Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults with Heart Failure: Prevalence, Documentation, and Impact on Outcomes. Am J Med. 2013;126:120–6. Landmark study on cognitive impairment in geriatric patients with heart failure. This paper demonstrates a high prevalence, low rate of documentation and an association with worse outcomes.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. Fifth INTERMACS Annual Report: Risk Factor Analysis From More Than 6,000 Mechanical Circulatory Support Patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:141–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maltby MC, Flattery M, Burns B, et al. Psychosocial assessment of candidates and risk classification of patients considered for durable mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;S1053-2498(14):01089–4. Psychosocial candidacy for LVAD implantation is difficult to assess and highly subjective. This easy to use tool allows clinicians to have a more objective means of estimating outcomes.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dunlay SM, Park S, Joyce L, et al. Frailty and outcomes after implantation of left ventricular assist device as destination therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(4):359–65. Frailty determines outcomes in cardiovascular illness. These authors studied the association between frailty and worsened outcomes after LVAD implantation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McIlvennan CK, Allen L, Nowels C, et al. Decision Making for Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:274–380. Summary of the means by which patients reached decisions to either accept or decline destination-therapy LVAD. This paper helps the provider to understand what factors influence decision making in this population of advanced HF patients.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jakovljevic DG, McDiarmid A, Hallsworth K, et al. Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Heart Transplantation on Habitual Physical Activity and Quality of Life. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(1):88–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mello IT, Ashcraft AS. The meaning in life for patients recently hospitalized with congestive heart failure. Am Assoc Nurse Prac. 2014;26:70–6. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12047.

    Google Scholar 

  25. LeMond LM, Allen L. Palliative Care and Hospice in Advanced Heart Failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;54:168–78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodlin SJ, Hauptman P, Arnold R, et al. Consensus Statement: Palliative and Supportive Care in Advanced Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2004;10(3):200–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Browne S, Macdonald S, May C, Macleod U, Mair FS. Patient, Carer and Professional Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Quality Care in Advanced Heart Failure. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93288.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Whellan DJ, Goodlin S, Dickinson M, et al. End-of-Life Care in Patients with Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2014;20(2):121–134. This is a white paper and review of available evidence on end of life care for persons with heart failure.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Greener DT, Quill T, Amir, Szydlowshi J, Gramling R. Palliative Care Referral among Patients Hospitalized with Advanced Heart Failure. J Pall Med 2014; (17): Epub ahead of print. Summarizes a single-center’s referral patterns to Palliative Care.

  30. Smith R. A Good Death. An Important Aim for Health Services and For Us All. BJM. 2000;320:129–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goodlin SJ. Palliative Care in Congestive Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(5):386–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Notarius CF, Morris B, Floras JS. Caffeine prolongs exercise duration in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2006;12(3):220–6.

  33. Dodson JA, Fried TR, Van Ness PH, Goldstein NE, Lampert R. Patient preferences for deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(5):377–9. Explores patient preferences for deactivation of ICD therapy. Important to understand patient beliefs surrounding their devices.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Westerdahl A, Sjöblom J, Mattiasson A, et al. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy Before Death: High Risk for Painful Shocks at End of Life. Circulation. 2014;129:422–9. Study that determined the frequency of ICD shocks at the end of life by doing postmortem interrogation of these devices.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldstein NE, Kallman J, Kutner J, et al. A Study to Improve Communication Between Clinicians and Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Methods and Challenges Behind the Working to Improve Discussions About Defibrillator Management Trial. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;S0885-3924(14):00216–4. Helpful article for formulating discussions about end of life management in patients with ICDs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Lisa LeMond and Dr. S. Albert Camacho each report no potential conflicts of interest.

Dr. Sarah J. Goodlin reports a research grant from Medtronic.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. Goodlin MD.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Heart Failure

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

LeMond, L., Camacho, S.A. & Goodlin, S.J. Palliative Care and Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 17, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-014-0359-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-014-0359-5

Keywords

Navigation