Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Evaluation and Management of Refractory Neurogenic Overactive Bladder

  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (H Goldman and G Badlani, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with neurologic disease commonly develop overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms of urgency, frequency, and/or urge incontinence that remain bothersome despite oral pharmacologic therapy. Management of refractory OAB in the neurogenic population is a complex issue with no uniform treatment strategy. When treatment fails or patients generally are dissatisfied with the adverse effects of oral therapy, available options include sacral neuromodulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), botulinum toxin injections, and lower urinary tract reconstruction such as augmentation cystoplasty. A thorough knowledge and understanding of available and emerging treatment options for neurogenic detrusor overactivity is paramount to assisting clinicians in choosing an appropriate treatment. This article reviews the non-pharmacologic treatment options for neurogenic OAB, mainly botulinum toxin, neuromodulation, and lower urinary tract reconstruction, and discusses important relevant studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Abrams P. Describing bladder storage function: overactive bladder syndrome and detrusor over-activity. Urology. 2003;62(Suppl):28. An excellent review of the pathophysiology of micturition. Additionally, this article provides an informative overview of overactive bladder.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth International consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:213–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cruz F, Siva C. Refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:22–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wein AJ. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in neurologic injury and disease. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. New York: Saunders; 2007. p. 2011–45. The definitive standard and authority on defining, detailing, and presenting the evaluation and management of neurogenic bladder.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Linsenmeyer TA, Linsenmeyer MA. Impact of annual urodynamic evaluations on guiding bladder management in individuals with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(5):420–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Larijani FJ, Moghtaderi M, Hajizadeh N, Assadi F. Preventing kidney injury in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(12):1359–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kennelly MJ, Devoe WB. Overactive bladder: pharmacologic treatments in the neurogenic population. Rev Urol. 2008;10(3):182–91. An excellent overview of the medical therapies available for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The authors also offer a broad outline of additional further therapies.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahai A, Cortes E, Seth J, Khan MS, Panicker J, Kelleher C, et al. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity in patients with spinal cord injury: evaluation and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(6):404–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Albanese A. Terminology for preparations of botulinum neurotoxins: what a difference a name makes. JAMA. 2011;305(1):89–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Linsenmeyer TA. Use of botulinum toxin in individuals with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: state of the art review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(5):402–19. A state-of-the-art review that provides excellent insight into the mechanism of action, as well as a review of the most current evidence available to support the use of botulinum toxin in the management of refractory neurogenic bladder.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Grosse J, Kramer G, Stöhrer M. Success of repeat detrusor injections of botulinum A toxin in patients with severe neurogenic detrusor overactivity and incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;47(5):653–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schurch B, Stöhrer M, Kramer G, Schmid DM, Gaul G, Hauri D. Botulinum-A toxin for treating detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a new alternative to anticholinergic drugs? Preliminary results. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 1):692–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gamé X, Castel-Lacanal E, Bentaleb Y, Thiry-Escudié I, DeBoissezon X, Malavaud B, et al. Botulinum toxin A detrusor injections in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity significantly decrease the incidence of urinary tract infections. Eur Urol. 2008;53(3):613–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Del Zingaro M, Porena M. Six-year follow-up of botulinum toxin A intradetrusotial injections in patients with refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity: clinical and urodynamic results. Eur Urol. 2009;55(3):705–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carlson JJ, Hansen RN, Dmochowski RR, Globe DR, Colayco DC, Sullivan SD. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in the United States. Clin Ther. 2013;35(4):414–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kennelly M, Dmochowski R, Ethans K, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of onabotulinum toxin A in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenicdetrusor overactivity: an interim analysis. Urology. 2013;81(3):491–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson RU, Orenberg EK, Glowe P. Onabotulinum toxin A office treatment for neurogenic bladder incontinence in Parkinson's disease. Urology. 2014;83(1):22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chancellor MB, Patel V, Leng WW, Shenot PJ, Lam W, Globe DR, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Neurology. 2013;81(9):841–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sussman D, Patel V, Del Popolo G, Lam W, Globe D, Pommerville P. Treatment satisfaction and improvement in health-related quality of life with onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(3):242–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. In: Watson T, editor. Electrotherapy: evidence-based practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 253–96.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chancellor MB, Chartier-Kastler EJ. Neuromodulation. 2000;3(1):16–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leng WW, Morrisroe SN. Urol Clin N Am. 2006;33:491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amundsen CL, Romero AA, Jamison MG, Webster GD. Sacral neuromodulation for intractable urge incontinence: are there factors associated with cure? Urology. 2005;66:746–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Medtronic. MRI guidelines for InterStimTherapy neurostimulation systems [online], http://manuals.medtronic.com/wcm/groups/mdtcom_sg/@emanuals/@era/@neuro/documents/documents/contrib_119885.pdf (2012).

  26. Bartley J, Gilleran J, Peters K. Neuromodulation for overactive bladder. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(9):513–21. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2013.143. A detailed review of the mechanism of action and a review of the current literature regarding the various modalities of neuromodulation that may be used in the management of refractory neurogenic bladder.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters KM, Kandagatla P, Killinger KA, Wolfert C, Boura JA. Clinical outcomes of sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurologic conditions. Urology. 2013;81(4):738–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lombardi G, Musco S, Celso M, Del Corso F, Del Popolo G. Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention in incomplete spinal cord patients: a ten-year follow-up single-centre experience. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(3):241–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Amarenco G et al. Urodynamic effect of acute transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in overactive bladder. J Urol. 2003;169:2210–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zecca C, Digesu GA, Robshaw P, Singh A, Elneil S, Gobbi C. Maintenance percutaneous posterior nerve stimulation for refractory lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: an open label, multicenter, prospective study. J Urol. 2014;191(3):697–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sajadi KP, Goldman HB. Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(5):389–93. An overview of the many types of urinary augmentation and diversion surgeries, their indications, and their techniques.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Biers SB, Venn SN, Greenwell TJ. The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty. BJUI. 2011;109:1280–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurung, Attar KH, Abdul-Rahman A, et al. Long-term outcomes of augmentation ileocystoplasty in patients with spinal cord injury: a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. BJU Int. 2012;109:1236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaida P, Pinter AB, Harangi F, et al. Metabolic findings after colocystoplasty in children. Urology. 2003;62:542–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kälble T, Hofmann I, Thüroff JW, et al. Secondary malignancies in urinary diversions. Urologe A. 2012;51(4):500. 502-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coyne KS, Wein A, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen CI, Milsom I. Economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence in the United States: a systematic review. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(2):130–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Raj Kurpad declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Dr. Michael J. Kennelly reports grants and personal fees from Allergan, Medtronic, and Uroplasty, as well as grants from Hollister, Coloplast, and Bard.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Kennelly.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurpad, R., Kennelly, M.J. The Evaluation and Management of Refractory Neurogenic Overactive Bladder. Curr Urol Rep 15, 444 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0444-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0444-z

Keywords

Navigation