Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Renal Transplantation in Augmented Bladders

  • Pediatric Urology (M Castellan and R Gosalbez, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Not many years ago, children with congenital abnormalities of the lower urinary tract or with bladder dysfunction were denied renal transplantation because they were considered very high-risk recipients. However, in the past few decades, we learned that in children with poorly compliant, low-capacity bladders, augmentation cystoplasty (AC) can create a compliant, low-pressure reservoir that helps preserve the kidney graft. Although the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) may be greater in pediatric transplant recipients with an AC than in those without, UTI is related more to noncompliance with clean intermittent catheterization or vesicoureteral reflux to the native kidney or graft than to the AC itself, and usually does not lead to impairment of graft function. Today, children with a bladder reconstruction may undergo transplantation with the same outcome (graft survival and function) as those with normal bladders, although there is some possibility of malignant transformation in the intestinal segment used to augment the bladder in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of great importance

  1. Rigamonti W, Capizzi A, Zachello G, et al. Kidney transplantation into bladder augmentation or urinary diversion: long-Term results. Transplantation. 2005;80:1435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarcan T, Bauer S, Olmedo E, Khoshbin S, Kelly M, Darbey M. Long-term followup of newborns with myelodysplasia and normal urodynamic findings: is followup necessary? J Urol. 2001;165:564–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaefer M, Pabby A, Kelly M, Darbey M, Bauer SB. Improved bladder function after prophylactic treatment of the high risk neurogenic bladder in newborns with myelomeningocele. J Urol. 1999;162:1068–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayashi Y, Yamataka A, Kaneyama K, Kato Y, Lane GJ, Miyano T. Review of 86 patients with myelodysplasia and neurogenic bladder who underwent sigmoidocolocystoplasty and were followed more than 10 years. J Urol. 2006;176:1806–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopez Pereira P, Moreno JA, Espinosa L, et al. Enterocystoplasty in children with neuropathic bladders: long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lima SVC, Araujo LAP, Vilar F, Lima RS. Nonsecretory intestinocystoplasty: a 15-year prospective study of 183 patients. J Urol. 2008;179:1113–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamzon J, Perin L, Koh CJ. Current status of tissue engineering in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:4044–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atala A. Regenerative medicine strategies. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:17–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taghizadeh AK, Desai D, Ledermann SE, et al. Renal transplantation or bladder augmentation first? A comparison of complications and outcomes in children. BJU Int. 2007;100:1365–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basiri A, Moghaddam SKR. Augmentation cystoplasty before and after renal transplantation: long-term results. Transplant Proc. 2002;34:2106–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fontaine E, Gagnadoux MF, Niaudet P, Broyer M, Beurton D. Renal transplantation in children with augmentation cystoplasty: long-term results. J Urol. 1998;159:2110–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E, Arap MA, et al. Augmentation cystoplasty in renal transplantation: a good and safe option: experience with 25 cases. Urology. 2002;60:770–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Basiri A, Otookesh H, Rozita H, Simforoosh N, Moghaddam SMH. Kidney transplantation before or after augmentation cystoplasty in children with high-pressure neurogenic bladder. BUJ Int. 2008;103:86–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kayler L, Kang D, Molmenti E, Howard R. Kidney transplant ureteroneocystostomy techniques and complications: review of the literature. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:1413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendizabal S, Zamora I, Serrano A, et al. Renal transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;21:566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross JH, Kay R, Novick AC, Hayes JM, Hodge EF, Streem SB. Long-term results of renal transplantation into the valve bladder. J Urol. 1994;151:1500–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopez Pereira P, Jaureguizar E, Martinez Urrutia MJ, Meseguer C, Navarro M. Does treatment of bladder dysfunction prior to renal transplant improve outcome in patients with posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Transplant. 2000;4:118–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Niuninga JE, Feitz WFJ, Van Dael KCML, De Gier RPE, Cornelissen EAM. Urological complications in pediatric renal transplantation. Eur Urol. 2001;39:598–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Otukesh H, Basiri A, Simfroosh N, Hoseini R, Fereshtehnejad S-M, Chalian M. Kidney transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Transplant. 2008;12:516–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sager C, Burek C, Duran V, et al. Outcome of renal transplant in patients with abnormal urinary tract. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27:423–30. This study compared RT outcomes among children who did not require lower urinary tract surgery (66 patients); those who required surgery but had preserved, adequate bladder function (46 patients); and those who required surgery because of bladder dysfunction (38 patients).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Basiri A, Otoukesh H, Simforoosh N, Rozita H, Farrokhi F. Kidney transplantation in children with augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol. 2007;178:274–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Traxel E, DeFoor W, Minevich E, et al. Low incidence of urinary tract infections following renal transplantation in children with bladder augmentation. J Urol. 2011;186:667–71. This study compared 17 patients undergoing AC and subsequent RT with a control group of transplant patients (17 patients) who were on CIC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira DA, Barroso Jr U, Machado P, et al. Effects of urinary tract infection in patients with bladder augmentation and kidney transplantation. J Urol. 2008;180:2607–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez Pereira P, Ortiz R, Fernandez Camblor C, et al. Renal transplant outcome in children with an augmented bladder. Front Pediatr. 2013;1(42):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soergel TM, Cain MP, Misseri R, Gardner TA, Koch MO, Rink RC. Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty for the neuropathic bladder. J Urol. 2004;172:1649–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Husmann DA, Rathbun SR. Long-term follow up of enteric bladder augmentations: the risk for malignancy. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:381–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Higuchi TT, Granberg CF, Fox JA, Husmann DA. Augmentation cystoplasty and risk of neoplasia: fact, fiction and controversy. J Urol. 2010;184:2492–7. This clinical study suggests that AC does not increase the risk of malignancy over the inherent cancer risk associated with the underlying congenital abnormality, and that RT immunosuppression, irrespective of bladder treatment, is an independent risk factor for malignancy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies. 2010 Annual Report. www.NAPRTCS.org.

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Pedro López Pereira, Dr. Maria Jose Martínez Urrutia, Dr. Roberto Lobato, and Dr. Enrique Jaureguizar each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. López Pereira.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatric Urology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, P.L., Urrutia, M.J.M., Lobato, R. et al. Renal Transplantation in Augmented Bladders. Curr Urol Rep 15, 431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0431-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0431-4

Keywords

Navigation