Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary Gender-Specific Outcomes in Germany After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

  • Urothelial Cancer (A Sagalowsky, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2008, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) was the 8th most common cause of death in Germany. An increasing body of evidence suggests differences in the presentation and prognosis of UCB between genders. Large population-based and multi-institutional studies have found a higher incidence of UCB in men, while women treated with radical cystectomy (RC) have shown unfavorable outcomes compared to their male counterparts. Indeed, it is important to note that UCB incidence and outcomes have regional and country-specific variability. These distinct country and gender-specific differences must be considered in patient counseling, treatment decisions, and UCB management. This review summarizes the contemporary literature regarding the impact of gender on UCB outcomes, focusing on patients treated with RC in Germany. We evaluated the most current literature regarding gender-specific differences in UCB incidence, treatment patterns, and oncological outcomes, including pathological stage distribution and survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burger M, Catto J, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63:234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Worlwide International Agency for Research on Cancer 2010, Lyon France, World Health Organisation: GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Disabiltity-adjusted life years (DALY’s) in 2008.

  4. Stenzl A, Cowan N, De Santis M, et al. Treatment of muscleinvasive and metastatic bladder cancer: update of the EAU guidelines. Eur Urol. 2011;59:1009–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weisbach L, Dahlem R, Simone G, et al. Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer treatment: considerations on relevance and extent. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013.

  6. Rink M, Cha EK, Green D, et al. Biomolecular predictors of urothelial cancer behavior and treatment outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(2):122–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS, et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J Urol. 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2414–22. discussion 2422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fajkovic H, Halpern J, Cha E, et al. Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis. World J Urol. 2001;29:457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bochner B, Kattan M, Vora K, International Bladder Cancer Nomogram Consortium. Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;4:3967–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, et al. Nomogram for predicting disease recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1354–61. discussion 1361-1352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vickers A, Cronin A, Kattan M, International Bladder Cancer Nomogram Consortium, et al. Clinical benefits of a multivariate prediction model for bladder cancer: a decision analytic approach. Cancer. 2009;115:5460–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boström P, Alkhateeb S, Trottier G, et al. Sex differences in bladder cancer outcomes among smokers with advanced bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2012;109:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. May M, Bastian PJ, Brookman-May S, et al. Gender-specific differences in cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in pathologic tumor stage T4a. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(7):1141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mungan NA, Aben KK, Schoenberg MP, et al. Gender differences in stage-adjusted bladder cancer survival. Urology. 2000;55(6):876–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mungan NA, Kiemeney LA, Van Dijck JA, et al. Gender differences in stage distribution of bladder cancer. Urology. 2000;55(3):368–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Otto W, May M, Fritsche H, et al. Analysis of sex differences in cancer-specific survival and perioperative mortality following radical cystectomy: results of a large German multicenter study of nearly 2500 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Gend Med. 2012;9(6):481–9. This large study comprising 2,483 German patients demonstrates that female gender has an unfavorable impact on cancer-specific survival. Although the data in this study were collected retrospectively, the results have adequate strength due to the large study size. The data provide a basis to define suitable patient populations and allow an estimation of an adequate size of study cohorts for prospective studies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Donsky H, Coyle S, Scosyrev E, Messing EM. Sex differences in incidence and mortality of bladder and kidney cancers: national estimates from 49 countries. Urol Oncol. 2013.

  18. Shariat SF, Sfakianos JP, Droller MJ, et al. The effect of age and gender on bladder cancer: a critical review of the literature. BJU Int. 2010;105(3):300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wizemann T, Pardue M. Committee on understanding the biology of sex and gender differences: exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? J Women’s Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:433–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmadi M, Ranjbaran H, Amiri MM, et al. Epidemiologic and socioeconomic status of bladder cancer in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(10):5053–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung K, Park S, Shin A, et al. Do female cancer patients display better survival rates compared with males? Analysis of the Korean National Registry data, 2005–2009. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Najari B, Rink M, Li P, et al. Sex disparities in cancer mortality: the risks of being a man in the United States. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1470–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Underwood 3rd W, Dunn RL, Williams C, Lee CT. Gender and geographic influence on the racial disparity in bladder cancer mortality in the US. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(2):284–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Crow P, Ritchie AW. National and international variation in the registration of bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2003;92(6):563–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rink M, Kluth L, Shariat S, et al. Use of PubMed to improve evidence-based medicine in routine urological practice. Urologe A. 2013;52(3):367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany: Krebs in Deutschland. Harnblase. (kid_2012_c67.pdf); 2012.

  27. Kunath F, Keck B, Bertz S, et al. Is gender becoming relevant in uro-oncological research? A bibliographical analysis. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1065–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pou SA, Osella AR, Diaz Mdel P. Bladder cancer mortality trends and patterns in Cordoba, Argentina (1986–2006). Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(3):407–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Datta G, Neville B, Datta N, Earle C. Gender disparities in bladder cancer survival: an assessment of sociodemographic factors. AACR Meeting, Abstracts 2006: B2038.

  31. Scosyrev E, Noyes K, Feng C, Messing E. Sex and racial differences in bladder cancer presentation and mortality in the US. Cancer. 2009;115(1):68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tilki D, Reich O, Svatek RS, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinical carcinoma in situ only treated with radical cystectomy: an international study of 243 patients. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tilki D, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with pT4 urothelial carcinoma at radical cystectomy: a retrospective international study of 583 patients. J Urol. 2010;183(1):87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tilki D, Svatek RS, Novara G, et al. Stage pT0 at radical cystectomy confers improved survival: an international study of 4,430 patients. J Urol. 2010;184(3):888–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Madeb R, Messing EM. Gender, racial and age differences in bladder cancer incidence and mortality. Urol Oncol. 2004;22(2):86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany: Report: Cancer in Germany 2007/2008; 2012.

  37. Nielsen ME, Smith AB, Meyer AM, et al. Trends in stage-specific incidence rates for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States: 1988 to 2006. Cancer. 2013.

  38. Abdollah F, Gandaglia G, Thuret R, et al. Incidence, survival and mortality rates of stage-specific bladder cancer in United States: a trend analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(3):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg: Frauen und Rauchen in Deutschland; 2008.

  40. Singer S, Ziegler C, Schwalenberg T, et al. Quality of life in patients with muscle invasive and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(5):1383–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. May M, Stief C, Brookman-May S, et al. Gender-dependent cancer-specific survival following radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2012;30(5):707–13. This German study of 521 UCB patients found that histopathological parameters did not differ significantly between genders. Interestingly, a reduced cancer-specific survival in women was present only in a historic subgroup of patients. Young female patients with positive LVI had significantly lower rates of CSS. These results demonstrate the current heterogeneity in findings.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jentzmik F, Schrader AJ, De Petriconi R, et al. The ileal neobladder in female patients with bladder cancer: long-term clinical, functional, and oncological outcome. World J Urol. 2012;30(6):733–9. This study provides information of good functional and oncological outcome of 121 female UCB patients who received an ileal neobladder at a German single-center.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kubler H, Gschwend JE. Ileal neobladder in women with bladder cancer: cancer control and functional aspects. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21(6):478–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rink M, Chun FK, Chromecki TF, et al. Advanced bladder cancer in elderly patients. Prognostic outcomes and therapeutic strategies. Urologe A. 2012;51(6):820–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rink M, Dahlem R, Kluth L, et al. Older patients suffer from adverse histopathological features after radical cystectomy. Int J Urol. 2011;18(8):576–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roghmann F, Trinh QD, Braun K, et al. Standardized assessment of complications in a contemporary series of European patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Int J Urol. 2013. This study assessed complications following RC in a contemporary series of 535 German patients.

  47. Aziz A, Gierth M, Fritsche H, et al. Oncological outcome of primary versus secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer is comparable after radical cystectomy. Urol Int. 2013;91(1):97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Buchner A, May M, Burger M, et al. Prediction of outcome in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder following radical cystectomy using artificial neural networks. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(4):372–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fritsche HM, May M, Denzinger S, et al. Prognostic value of perinodal lymphovascular invasion following radical cystectomy for lymph node-positive urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):739–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hautmann R, De Petriconi R, Pfeiffer C, Volkmer B. Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: long-term results in 1100 patients. Eur Urol. 2012;61(5):1039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. May M, Fritsche H, Gilfrich C, et al. Influence of older age on survival after radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: survival analysis of a German multi-centre study after curative treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urologe A. 2011;50(7).

  52. May M, Herrmann E, Bolenz C, et al. Association between the number of dissected lymph nodes during pelvic lymphadenectomy and cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node-negative urothelial carcinoma of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(7):2018–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Froehner M, et al. Systematic assessment of complications and outcome of radical cystectomy undertaken with curative intent in patients with comorbidity and over 75 years of age. Urol Int. 2013;90(2):195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Horstmann M, Witthuhn R, Falk M, Stenzl A. Gender-specific differences in bladder cancer: a retrospective analysis. Gend Med. 2008;5(4):385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Soave A, Dahlem R, Hansen J, et al. Gender-specific outcomes after radical cystectomy: a contemprorary, homogenous bladder cancer cohort analyzed stage-by-stage. J Urol. 2013;189:667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, Amiel GE, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with carcinoma in situ only at radical cystectomy. Urology. 2006;68(3):538–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lotan Y, Gupta A, Shariat SF, et al. Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with overall survival, cause-specific survival, and local and distant recurrence in patients with negative lymph nodes at radical cystectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(27):6533–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gierth M, Fritsche HM, Buchner H, et al. Clinical and pathological nodal staging score for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: an external validation. World J Urol. 2013.

  59. Shariat SF, Rink M, Ehdaie B, et al. Pathologic nodal staging score for bladder cancer: a decision tool for adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;63(2):371–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zeegers MP, Tan FE, Dorant E, Van Den Brandt PA. The impact of characteristics of cigarette smoking on urinary tract cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Cancer. 2000;89(3):630–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Freedman N, Silverman D, Hollenbeck A, et al. Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. 2011;206(7):737–45.

  62. Crivelli JJ, Xylinas E, Kluth LA, et al. Effect of smoking on outcomes of urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2013.

  63. Rink M, Zabor EC, Furberg H, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on outcomes in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(3):456–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Okajima E, Hiramatsu T, Iriya K, et al. Effects of sex hormones on development of urinary bladder tumours in rats induced by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine. Urol Res. 1975;3(2):73–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Boorjian S, Ugras S, Mongan N. Androgen receptor expression is inversely correlated with pathologic tumor stage in bladder cancer. Urology. 2004;64:383–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gakis G, Stenzl A. Gender-specific differences in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the concept of sex steroid sensitivity. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1059–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Miyamoto H, Yang Z, Chen YT, et al. Promotion of bladder cancer development and progression by androgen receptor signals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(7):558–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shen SS, Smith CL, Hsieh JT, et al. Expression of estrogen receptors-alpha and -beta in bladder cancer cell lines and human bladder tumor tissue. Cancer. 2006;106(12):2610–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mcgrath M, Michaud DS, De Vivo I. Hormonal and reproductive factors and the risk of bladder cancer in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(3):236–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Johnson E, Daignault S, Zhang Y, Lee C. Patterns of hematuria referral to urologists: does a gender disparity exist? Urology. 2008;72:498–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Henning A, Wehrberger M, Madersbacher S, et al. Do differences in clinical symptoms and referral patterns contribute to the gender gap in bladder cancer? BJU Int. 2013;112(1):68–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cardenas-Turanzas M, Cooksley C, Kamat AM, et al. Gender and age differences in blood utilization and length of stay in radical cystectomy: a population-based study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(4):893–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Taub DA, Hollenbeck BK, Cooper KL, et al. Racial disparities in resource utilization for cystectomy. Urology. 2006;67(2):288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Siegrist T, Savage C, Shabsigh A, et al. Analysis of gender differences in early perioperative complications following radical cystectomy at a tertiary cancer center using a standardized reporting methodology. Urol Oncol. 2010;28(1):112–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Marianne Schmid, Dr. Shahrokh F. Shariat, Dr. Armin Soave, Dr. Oliver Engel, and Dr. Margit Fisch each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Dr. Michael Rink receives the GEROK research grant of the University of Hamburg.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rink.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Urothelial Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmid, M., Shariat, S.F., Soave, A. et al. Contemporary Gender-Specific Outcomes in Germany After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 15, 409 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0409-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0409-2

Keywords

Navigation