Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual Dysfunction Following Urethroplasty for Urethral Stricture Disease

  • Male and Female Surgical Interventions (C Carson & P Selph, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To review the relationship between different techniques of urethroplasty on sexual function, discuss the limitations of current literature, and report on novel techniques for improving sexual function following urethroplasty.

Recent Findings

Recent literature utilizing prospective trials comparing different techniques of urethroplasty (transecting vs. non-transecting) have shown no significant difference in postoperative sexual function outcomes. It is now apparent that postoperative sexual outcomes play a significant role in overall patient satisfaction with urethroplasty. Current scientific evidence is limited by either low sample size, heterogeneous patient populations, differing urethroplasty techniques, varied stricture etiologies, differing follow-up protocols, or the reliance on self-reporting of sexual function by patients through either validated or non-validated questionnaires. Urethroplasty-specific questionnaires are being developed to better characterize sexual dysfunction postoperatively.

Summary

Current data support an overall low impact of urethroplasty on sexual function; however, the more nuanced aspects of sexual function have not been adequately defined due to the limitations of current literature. Further investigation utilizing standardized questionnaires with the ability to elicit data regarding the different elements of sexual function will be necessary for further characterization of the impact of urethroplasty in order to optimize patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Grossberg Anna L, Santucci R, Anger Jennifer T, Saigal CS. The morbidity of urethral stricture disease among male Medicare beneficiaries. BMC Urol. 2010;10(1):3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Urethral Diseases. In: Litwin MS, Saigal CS, editors. Urologic Diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2012;213–248.

  3. Romero Pérez P, Mira LA. Complications of the lower urinary tract secondary to urethral stenosis. Actas Urol Esp. 1996;20(9):786–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Romero Pérez P, Mira LA. Male urethral stenosis: review of complications. Arch Esp Urol. 2004;57(5):485–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M. Male urethral stricture disease. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1667–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. What is the best technique for urethroplasty? Eur Urol. 2008;54(5):1031–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rourke KF, Jordan GH. Primary Urethral Reconstruction:The COST minimized APPROACH to the BULBOUS urethral stricture. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1206–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, De Nunzio C, Bozzini G, Maruccia S, Scoffone C, et al. The impact of ventral Oral graft bulbar urethroplasty on sexual life. Urology. 2013;81(4):891–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santucci RA, Mario LA, McAninch JW.Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients. J Urol. 2002;167(4):1715–9.

  10. Micheli E, Ranieri A, Peracchia G, Lembo A. End-to-end urethroplasty: long-term results. BJU Int. 2002;90(1):68–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kessler TM, Schreiter F, Kralidis G, Heitz M, Olianas R, Fisch M. Long-term results of surgery for urethral stricture: a statistical analysis. J Urol. 2003;170(3):840–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol. 2003;170(1):90–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. • D’hulst P, Floyd MS, Castiglione F, Vander Eeckt K, Joniau S, Van der Aa F. Excision and primary anastomosis for bulbar urethral strictures improves functional outcomes and quality of life: a prospective analysis from a single centre. Biomed Res Int. .2019;7826085. This study was a prospective study using patient-reported outcomes instruments to analyze outcomes after urethroplasty. The authors found a significant worsening of erectile function in the first 2 months after surgery, but this had largely resolved by 20 months after surgery. This is reassuring in that erectile function recovered, but one must consider that it took more than a year for this to happen.

  14. Dogra PN, Saini AK, Seth A. Erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: a prospective analysis of incidence and probability of recovery—single-center experience. Urology. 2011;78(1):78–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Meeks JJ, Cashy JP, Gonzalez CM. Prospective analysis of erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: incidence and recovery of function. J Urol. 2010;183(2):657–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Long-term followup of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: a retrospective analysis of 153 patients in a single center experience. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2470–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R, Schlossberg SM, McCammon KA, Jordan GH. Long-term followup for excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1803–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wingate J, Elliott S, Vanni A, Erickson B, Myers J, Breyer B, et al. PD22-02 a multicenter assessment of stricture location and type of urethroplasty on erectile function. J Urol. 2019;201(Supplement 4) p e387.

  19. Morey AF, Kizer WS. Proximal bulbar urethroplasty via extended anastomotic approach—what are the limits? J Urol. 2006;175(6):2145–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koraitim MM. On the art of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty: a 27-year experience. J Urol. 2005;173(1):135–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barbagli G, De Stefani S, Annino F, De Carne C, Bianchi G. Muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty: a new technique. Eur Urol. 2008;54(2):335–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma V, Kumar S, Mandal AK, Singh SK. A study on sexual function of men with anterior urethral stricture before and after treatment. Urol Int. 2011;87(3):341–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. • Haines T, Rourke K. The effect of urethral transection on erectile function after anterior urethroplasty. World J Urol. 2017;35(5):839–45 In this study of erectile function after urethroplasty, the authors of this small cohort found that erectile function was not affected by urethral transection vs. non-transection. However, age over 50 was associated with worse erectile function after urethroplasty.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekerhult TO, Lindqvist K, Peeker R, Grenabo L. Low risk of sexual dysfunction after transection and nontransection urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture. J Urol. 2013;190(2):635–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chapman DW, Cotter K, Johnsen NV, Patel S, Kinnaird A, Erickson BA, et al. PD30-09 non-transecting techniques reduce sexual dysfunction after anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: results of a multicenter comparative analysis. J Urol. 2018;199(4):e637–e.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Welk BK, Kodama RT. The augmented nontransected anastomotic Urethroplasty for the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. Urology. 2012;79(4):917–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anger JT, Sherman ND, Webster GD. The effect of bulbar urethroplasty on erectile function. J Urol. 2007;178(3):1009–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blaschko SD, Sanford MT, Cinman NM, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. D e novo erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2013;112(5):655–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bertrand LA, Voelzke BB, Elliott SP, Myers JB, Breyer BN, Vanni AJ, et al. Measuring and predicting patient dissatisfaction after anterior urethroplasty using patient reported outcomes measures. J Urol. 2016;196(2):453–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh U, Maheshwari R, Kumar V, Srivastava A, Kapoor R. Impact on sexual function after reconstructive surgery for anterior urethral stricture disease. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(2):188–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Erickson BA, Wysock JS, McVary KT, Gonzalez CM. Erectile function, sexual drive, and ejaculatory function after reconstructive surgery for anterior urethral stricture disease. BJU Int. 2007;99(3):607–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Meeks JJ, McVary KT, Gonzalez CM. Prospective analysis of ejaculatory function after anterior urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 2010;184(1):238–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dubey D, Bansal P, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. Substitution urethroplasty for anterior ureteral strictures: a critical appraisal of various techniques. Eur Urol Suppl. 2002;1(1):87.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Srivastava A, Vashishtha S, Singh UP, Srivastava A, Ansari MS, Kapoor R, et al. Preputial/penile skin flap, as a dorsal onlay or tubularized flap: a versatile substitute for complex anterior urethral stricture. BJU Int. 2012;110(11c):E1101–E8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dubey D, Vijjan V, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kumar A, et al. Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa versus penile skin flap urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: results from a randomized prospective trial. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2466–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Soliman MG, Abo Farha M, El Abd AS, Abdel Hameed H, El Gamal S. Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa graft versus penile skin flap for management of long anterior urethral strictures: a prospective randomized study. Scand J Urol. 2014;48(5):466–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maciejewski CC, Haines T, Rourke KF. Chordee and penile shortening rather than voiding function are associated with patient dissatisfaction after urethroplasty. Urology. 2017;103:234–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mulhall JP. Defining and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy: challenges and misconceptions. J Urol. 2009;181(2):462–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Patel DP, Elliott SP, Voelzke BB, Erickson BA, McClung CD, Presson AP, et al. Patient-reported sexual function after staged penile urethroplasty. Urology. 2015;86(2):395–400.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yucel S, Baskin LS. Neuroanatomy of the male urethra and perineum. BJU Int. 2003;92(6):624–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. • Fredrick A, Erickson BA, Stensland K, Vanni AJ. Functional effects of bulbospongiosus muscle sparing on ejaculatory function and post-void dribbling after bulbar urethroplasty. J Urol. 2017;197(3):738–43 Using bulbospongiosus muscle sparing techniques is a new, popular addition to the urethroplasty armamentarium. Its suggested benefits include reduced side effects of the surgery, such as less post void dribbling, less ejaculatory dysfunction, and improved surgical outcomes. Alas, in this matched study of 50 men undergoing urethroplasty (25 who had muscle sparing and 25 who did not), sparing the bulbospongiosus muscle was not shown to improve ejaculatory function or post-void dribbling after surgery.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jordan GH, Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R. The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1799–802.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lumen N, Poelaert F, Oosterlinck W, Lambert E, Decaestecker K, Tailly T, et al. Nontransecting anastomotic repair in urethral reconstruction: surgical and functional outcomes. J Urol. 2016;196(6):1679–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ivaz S, Bugeja S, Frost A, Andrich D, Mundy AR. The nontransecting Approach to bulbar Urethroplasty. Urol Clin N Am. 2017;44(1):57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Florio M, Cucchiarale G, Milan G, Valentino F, et al. Two-sided urethra-sparing reconstruction combining dorsal preputial skin plus ventral buccal mucosa grafts for tight bulbar strictures. Int J Urol. 2015;22(9):861–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Patrick Selph.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Male and Female Surgical Interventions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fougerousse, J.A., Selph, J.P. Sexual Dysfunction Following Urethroplasty for Urethral Stricture Disease. Curr Sex Health Rep 12, 405–410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00288-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00288-y

Keywords

Navigation