Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Review of Female Genital Cutting (FGC) in the Dawoodi Bohra Community:

Part 1—FGC Terminology, Western Genital Cutting Practices, Southeast Asian Type Ia and Type IV FGC Practices

  • Sociocultural Issues and Epidemiology (J Abdulcadir and C Johnson-Agbakwu, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The aim of this first review out of a three-part series is to provide an overview of the practices of genital cutting including male circumcision, genital alteration of children with ambiguous genitalia, and clitoral hood reduction in Western societies; and type IV FGC in Southeast Asia. Examination of these procedures provides context for the practice of Khafd, female genital cutting (FGC), in the Dawoodi Bohra community.

Recent Findings

In 2018, a Sri Lankan Parliamentary Sectoral Oversight Committee on Women and Gender (PSOCWG) heard the confidential testimonies of 15 women. Subsequently, a circular to medical professionals advised them to refrain from FGC. In September 2018, there was a call by multiple Islamic organizations to medicalize the practice and remove the circular that doctors should refrain from FGC.

Summary

In this review, the WHO terminology for FGC classification is evaluated, and criticisms published online from the Dawoodi Bohra perspective are underscored. Practices pertinent to Khafd are scrutinized. Western practices, male circumcision, genital surgeries for children with ambiguous genitalia, and clitoral hood reduction, are described to further contextualize Khafd. Position statements from professional medical societies on male circumcision are reviewed. Type IV genital cutting is widely practiced in Southeast Asian Muslims and is largely medicalized. The review paper highlights two studies. Interviews with 262 Malay women from Malaysia comprise the first study. The second is a qualitative study conducted by Islamic Relief Canada, an advocacy organization aimed to end the practice, with data collected from Indonesian women in 2013. Interestingly, all of the above practices of genital cutting adhere to social norms and are largely accepted within the communities that practice these different forms of genital cutting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Recommendations for preventative pediatric health care. Bright Futures. s.l. American Academy of Pediatrics. Accessed online October 2018 @ https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/periodicity_schedule.pdf.

  2. Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. Policy Statement - Use of chaperones during the physical exam of the pediatric patient, Pediatrics. Vol. 2011;127:991.

  3. Hagan JF, et al. Bright futures guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. In: Elk Grove Village. 4th ed: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.

  4. Cheikhelard A, Chaktoura Z, Thibaud E. Prepubertal female child gynecologic exam. Endocrinology. 2012;22:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. Care of girls and women living with female genital mutilation: a clinical handbook. Geneva; 2018. s.n.. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

  6. •• Cappa C, Van Baelen L, Leye E. The practice of female genital mutilation across the world: data availability and approaches to measurement. Glob Public Health. 2019:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1571091 Most up to date description of prevalence of FGC practice worldwide.

  7. •• Isa AR, Shuib R, Othman MS. The practice of female circumcision among Muslims in Kelantan, Malaysia. Reprod Health Matters. 1999;7:137–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90125-8 Provides insight into social norms and religious basis for FGC. It is also similar FGC practice to what is described in the Bohra community.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Patel R, Roy K. Female genital cutting in Indonesia; a field study. Islamic Relief Canada. 2013. Field Study Report. Accessed online 11/9/18 @ http://islamicreliefcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IRC_FGC_Report.pdf. Qualitative study examining FGC practice providing insight into social norms and religious basis for FGC. It is also similar FGC practice to what is described in the Bohra community.

  9. Wickramage K, Senanayake L, Mapitigama N, Karunasinghe J, Teagal E. The need for an evidence-informed, multi-sectoral and community participatory action framework to address the practice of female genital mutilation in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J. 2018;63:53–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Academy of Pediatrics. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130:585–6. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1989 originally published online August 27, 2012.

  11. Earp BD, Frisch M. Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: a critical assessment of recent evidence. Glob Public Health. 2018;13:626–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1184292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. CIRP. Circumcision: medical organization official policy statements. [Online] March 21, 2016. [Cited: October 15, 2018]. http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/.

  13. Barthold JS. Disorders of sex differentiation: a pediatric urologist’s perspective of new terminology and recommendations. J Urol. 2011;185:393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Earp B. In: Edmonds D, editor. Ethics and the contemporary world: the child’s right to bodily integrity. Abingdon: Routledge; 2019. p. 217–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Clitoral unhooding. [Online] October 20, 2006. http://www.Clitoralunhooding.com.

  16. Hussein A. Female circumcision an islamic practice brings untold benefits to women. Daily Mirror. September 18, 2018. Accessed online October 2018 @ http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Female-Circumcision-An-Islamic-practice-brings-untold-benefits-to-women-155646.html.

  17. Behrendt A. Listening to African voices; female genital mutilation/cutting among immigrants in Hamburg: knowledge, attitudes and practice. [Online] 2011. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.400.67&rep=rep1&type=pdf18.

  18. Duivenbode R, Padela AI. Female genital cutting (FGC) and the cultural boundaries of medical practice. Am J Bioeth. 19:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1554412.

  19. Zakir M. WHO’s stance and the criminalization of female circumcision: the protection of or violation of human rights? [Article link found on websites for Female Circumcision and Dawoodi Bohra Women for Religious Freedom]. 2016. Accessed online @ https://dbwrf.org/causes/4 and https://femalecircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/The-protection-of-or-violation-of-human-rights-Copy.pdf. https://dbwrf.org/causes/4.

  20. Abdulcadir J, et al. Seven things to know about female genital surgeries in Africa. Hastings Center. 2012;42(6).

  21. WHO. Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review. s.l. : UNAIDS, 2010. UNAIDS/10.07E – JC1672E. https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/malecircumcision/neonatal_child_MC_UNAIDS.pdf. Accessed online June 21, 2019.

  22. Morris BJ, Krieger JN, Klausner JD. CDC’s male circumcision recommendations represent a key public health measure. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5:15–27. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Earp B. You Tube. You Tube - National Secular Society. [Online] [Cited: June 23, 2019]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV7oADV2kIQ&t=517s.

  24. Hussein A. Female genital mutilation. Daily Mirror. October 11, 2018. Accessed online October 2018 @ https://www.pressreader.com/sri-lanka/daily-mirror-sri-lanka/20181011/281883004298213.

  25. Pemberton FA. The Prepuce of the clitoris and gonorrhea: Clodi and Schopper: Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift: 1922, xxxv, 197. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1925;10:304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pilot I, Kanteh AE. Studies of fusiform bacilli and spirochetes: III. Occurrence in normal women about the clitoris and significance in certain genital infections. J Infect Dis. 1923;32:204–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McDonald CF. Circumcision of the female. Gen Pract. 1958;XVIII:98–9 Accessed online 11/3/18 @ http://www.noharmm.org/circumfemale.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D’Souza G, et al. Case control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1944–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gillison M. Human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer correspondence. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1156–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ainslie M. The 2009 Malaysian female circumcision fatwa: state ownership of Islam and the current impasse. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 2015;52:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wikipedia. Fatimid Caliphate. [Online] [Cited: November 10, 2018]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatimid_Caliphate.

  32. Unicef Data: Monitoring the situation of children and women. [Online] December 15, 2014. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/country_profiles/Indonesia/FGMC_IDN.pdf.

  33. Debate on female circumcision in Indonesia heats up even as minor howls through pain. Hindustan Times. April 24, 2017. Accessed 11/10/18 online @ https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/debate-on-female-circumcision-in-indonesia-heats-up-even-as-minor-howls-through-pain/story-0MgwbeKw5Gxfp0MMZkAjtI.html.

  34. Fernando V. Female genital mutilation: a lifetime of scarred agony. Sunday Observer; 2018. Accessed online 11/2/18 @ http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2018/10/21/news-features/female-genital-mutilation-lifetime-scarred-agony.

  35. Behary H. Female Genital mutilation is forbidden in Islam: Dar Al-Ifta. Egypt Independent; 2018.

  36. Chung S. 28 Too Many. The psychological effects of female genital mutilation. [Online] May 16, 2016. [Cited: January 9, 2019.] https://www.28toomany.org/blog/the-psychological-effects-of-female-genital-mutilation-research-blog-by-serene-chung/.

  37. Newman, Anneke and 28 Too Many. FGM and social norms: a guide to designing culturally sensitive community programmes. 2019. Accessed at: https://www.28toomany.org/thematic/social-norms-and-fgm/ June 21,2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasmin Bootwala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Sociocultural Issues and Epidemiology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bootwala, Y. A Review of Female Genital Cutting (FGC) in the Dawoodi Bohra Community: . Curr Sex Health Rep 11, 212–219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00212-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00212-z

Keywords

Navigation