Skip to main content
Log in

Presenting a Framework for Telebehavioral Health Implementation

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper presents OPTIC as a framework to guide the conceptualization and implementation of telebehavioral health (TBH) in a comprehensive, structured, and accessible manner.

Recent Findings

There is a need for comprehensive frameworks for TBH implementation, yet current models and frameworks described in the literature have limitations. Many studies highlight favorable outcomes of TBH during COVID-19, along with increased adoption. However, despite the plethora of publications on general telehealth implementation, knowledge is disparate, inconsistent, not comprehensive, and not TBH-specific.

Summary

The framework incorporates five components: Originating site, Patient population, Teleclinician, Information and communication technologies, and Cultural and regulatory context. These components, abbreviated using the acronym OPTIC, are discussed, with examples of implementation considerations under each component throughout the project cycle. The value and larger implications of OPTIC are discussed as a foundation for stakeholders involved with TBH, in addition to key performance indicators, and considerations for quality enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No primary data was collected for the purposes of this study. The data is secondary and was extracted from the sources listed in this manuscript. The raw data files can be made available by contacting the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •  Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Mahmoud H, Vogt EL, Sers M, Fattal O, Ballout S. Overcoming barriers to larger-scale adoption of telepsychiatry. Psychiatric Annals. Slack Incorporated; 2019;49:82–8.

  2. Hilty DM, Ferrer DC, Parish MB, Johnston B, Callahan EJ, Yellowlees PM. The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19(6):444–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Garfan S, Alamoodi AH, Zaidan BB, Al-Zobbi M, Hamid RA, Alwan JK, et al. Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Comput Biol Med. Elsevier Ltd; 2021;138.

  4. Vahratian A, Blumberg SJ, Terlizzi EP, Schiller JS. Morbidity and mortality weekly report symptoms of anxiety or depressive disorder and use of mental health care among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic-United States [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.census.gov/data/experimental-data-products.html.

  5. Whaibeh E, Mahmoud H, Naal H. Telemental health in the context of a pandemic: the COVID-19 experience. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2020;7(2):198–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Samson L, Tarazi W, Turrini G, Sheingold S. Medicare beneficiaries’ use of telehealth in 2020: trends by beneficiary characteristics and location. 2020.

  7. Lattie EG, Stiles-Shields C, Graham AK. An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services. Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(2):87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whaibeh E, Vogt EL, Mahmoud H. Addressing the behavioral health needs of sexual and gender minorities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the expanding role of digital health technologies. Curr Psychiatry Rep. Springer; 2022;24:387–97.

  9. HHS. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/telehealth-policy/policy-changes-after-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency. 2023. Telehealth policy changes after the COVID-19 public health emergency.

  10. Mahmoud H, Naal H, Whaibeh E, Smith A. Telehealth-based delivery of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder: a critical review of recent developments. Curr Psychiatry Rep. Springer; 2022;24:375–86.

  11. Mohr DC, Richardson E. Telemental health: reflections on how to move the field forward.

  12. van Dyk L. A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(2):1279–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Haidous M, Tawil M, Naal H, Mahmoud H. A review of evaluation approaches for telemental health programs. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2021;25:195–205.

  14. • Lokken TG, Blegen RN, Hoff MD, Demaerschalk BM. Overview for implementation of telemedicine services in a large integrated multispecialty health care system. Telemed e-Health. 2019;00(00):1–6. While not BH specific, this publication outlines a systematic approach to delivering telehealth within a large integrated healthcare system. emphasis on infrastructure, standardized process, monitoring systems, and data analytics.

  15. APA. American Psychiatric Association. 2018. APA and ATA Release New Telemental Health Guide.

  16. Turvey C, Coleman M, Dennison O, Drude K, Goldenson M, Hirsch P, et al. ATA practice guidelines for video-based online mental health services. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19:722–30.

  17. ATA. Core operational guidelines for telehealth services involving provider-patient interactions. 2018.

  18. ATA. Practice guidelines for video-based online mental health services. 2013.

  19. Khoja S, Durrani H, Scott RE, Sajwani A, Piryani U. Conceptual framework for development of comprehensive e-health evaluation tool. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19(1):48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang H. Evaluation framework for telemedicine using the logical framework approach and a fishbone diagram. Healthcare Informatics Research. Korean Society of Medical Informatics. 2015;21:230–8.

  21. Maheu MM, Drude KP, Hertlein KM, Lipschutz R, Wall K, Hilty DM. An interprofessional framework for telebehavioral health competencies. J Technol Behav Sci. 2017;2(3–4):190–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haddad TC, Blegen RN, Prigge JE, Cox DL, Anthony GS, Leak MA, et al. A scalable framework for telehealth: the Mayo Clinic Center for Connected Care Response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine Reports. Mary Ann Liebert Inc.; 2021;2:78–87.

  23. Mahmoud H, Whaibeh E, Mitchell B. Ensuring successful telepsychiatry program implementation: critical components and considerations. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2020;7(2):186–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia R, Adelakun O. A conceptual framework and pilot study for examining telemedicine satisfaction research. J Med Syst. 2019;43(3).

  25. Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2001.

  26. Edmunds M, Tuckson R, Lewis J, Atchinson B, Rheuban K, Fanberg H, et al. An emergent research and policy framework for telehealth. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes). 2017;5(2):1.

  27. Rangachari P, Mushiana SS, Herbert K. A narrative review of factors historically influencing telehealth use across six medical specialties in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. MDPI; 2021;18.

  28. Mahmoud H, Naal H, Whaibeh E, editors. Essentials of telebehavioral health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shore JH, Yellowlees P, Caudill R, Johnston B, Turvey C, Mishkind M, et al. Best practices in videoconferencing-based telemental health April 2018. Telemed e-Health. 2018;24(11):827–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mishkind MC. Establishing telemental heath services from conceptualization to powering up. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2019;42(4).

  31. Chowdhury A, Hafeez-Baig A, Gururajan R, Chakraborty S. Conceptual framework for telehealth adoption in Indian healthcare. 2019.

  32. Hilty DM, Maheu MM, Drude KP, Hertlein KM, Wall K, Long RP, et al. Telebehavioral health, telemental health, e-therapy and e-health competencies: the need for an interprofessional framework. J Technol Behav Sci. Springer; 2017;2:171–89.

  33. Mahmoud H, Naal H, Cerda S. Planning and implementing telepsychiatry in a community mental health setting: a case study report. Community Ment Health J. 2021;57(1):35–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Waqas A, Rehman A, Malik A, Aftab R, Allah Yar A, Allah Yar A, et al. Exploring the association of ego defense mechanisms with problematic internet use in a Pakistani medical school. Psychiatry Res [Internet]. 2016;243:463–8. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2016-43877-072&site=ehost-live.

  35. Reynolds J, Griffiths KM, Cunningham JA, Bennett K, Bennett A. Clinical practice models for the use of e-mental health resources in primary health care by health professionals and peer workers: a conceptual framework. JMIR Ment Health. 2015;2(1):e6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. •• Hilty DM, Chan S, Torous J, Luo J, Boland RJ. A telehealth framework for mobile health, smartphones, and apps: competencies, training, and faculty development. J Technol Behav Sci. 2019;4(2):106–23. Discusses the knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as further training for clinicians in the use of increasingly diverse uses of technologies within healthcare.

  37. ATA. Practice guidelines for video-based online mental health services. USA; 2013.

  38. Moran M. Impact of culture, race, social determinants reflected throughout new DSM-5-TR. Psychiatr News. 2022;57(3).

  39. Trinh NH, Tuchman S, Chen J, Chang T, Yeung A. Cultural humility and the practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry. Psychosomatics. 2020;61(4):313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. HHS. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/billing-and-reimbursement/medicare-payment-policies. 2023. Medicare payment policies.

  41. Daniel H, Sulmasy LS. Policy recommendations to guide the use of telemedicine in primary care settings: an American College of Physicians Position Paper. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(10).

  42. APA. After the pandemic: what will the new normal be in psychiatry. 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossam Mahmoud.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmoud, H., Naal, H., Mitchell, B. et al. Presenting a Framework for Telebehavioral Health Implementation. Curr Psychiatry Rep 25, 825–837 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-023-01470-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-023-01470-4

Keywords

Navigation