Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

No Exceptions to the Rules: Professional Ethics Should Apply to Sexual Offender Civil Commitment Proceedings

  • Sexual Disorders (LE Marshall and H Moulden, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We review the non-punitive intents and goals of sexual offender civil commitment (“SOCC”) proceedings. We apply the impacts of open courtrooms in SOCC hearings to what is known about the provision of effective, ethical, and constitutional interventions to those committed and we examine whether open proceedings are consistent with evidence-based practices, including the risk, needs, and responsivity principles.

Recent Findings

The use of open courtrooms in SOCC proceedings presents numerous barriers to ethical, effective, and efficient interventions. Open courtrooms fuel treatment resistance, low treatment enrollment, exacerbation of risk factors, and mental conditions, and they disrupt protective factors, undermining the integrity of SOCC systems. These negative consequences are punitive and inconsistent with evidence-based practices, the RNR principles, and do not facilitate positive treatment outcomes.

Summary

The SOCC’s purpose is to prevent sexual re-offense by helping those committed improve their sexual offense risk-related mental conditions. Open courtrooms and the harm they cause undermine the constitutionality pillars of SOCC proceedings and are inconsistent with best practice principles. Legislators, judges, attorneys, and policymakers should monitor and reform courtroom procedures to ensure they are consistent with evidence-based practices and the non-punitive intent and goals of civil commitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Schneider J, Jackson R, Ambroziak G, D’Orazio D, Freeman N, Hebert J. SOCCPN Annual Survey of Sex Offender Civil Commitment Programs 2019. Presentation at the annual SOCCPN conference, Atlanta, Georgia. 2019.

  2. Bonta J, Andrews DA. The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed). Taylor & Francis; 2016.

  3. Hanson RK, Bourgon G, Helmus L, Hodgson S. The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav. 2009;36(9):865–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ATSA. ATSA professional code of ethics. 2017. Retrieved at https://www.atsa.com/Public/Ethics/ATSA_2017_Code_of_Ethics.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  5. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). 2010. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.

  6. American Psychological Association. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. Am Psychol. 2013;68(1):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American Bar Association. Model rules of professional conduct. 2020. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents/. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  8. Thornton D, D’Orazio D. Best practice in SVP treatment programs. In L.C. Craig, L. Dixon and T. Gannon (Eds.) What works in offender rehabilitation: an evidenced based approach to assessment and treatment. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

  9. Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 1979.

  10. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: Civil Commitment and the Mental Health Care Continuum: Historical Trends and Principles for Law and Practice. Rockville, MD: Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2019.

  11. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S., 346, 1997, p. 371–373.

  12. Cal. Welf & Inst. Code § 6250 (1995).

  13. Hubbart v. Superior Court 19 Cal. 4th 1138 (1999).

  14. Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code §, 6600 et seq. (1996)

  15. Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980).

  16. People v. Dixon, 148 Cal.App.4th 414 (2007).

  17. Sorenson v. Superior Court, 219 Cal.App.4th 409 (2013).

  18. Megan’s Law, 1996 amendment to Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offenders Registration Act of 1994.

  19. Ackerman AR, Sacks M, Greenberg DF. Legislation targeting sex offenders: are recent policies effective in reducing rape? Justice Q. 2011, 1–30.

  20. • Bouffard JA, Askew LN. Time-series analyses of the impact of sex offender registration and notification law implementation and subsequent modifications on rates of sexual offenses. Crime Delinq. 2019;65(11):1483–512. Results revealed no effect from sex offender registry or notification and its subsequent modifications, on sexual re-offense rates.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Letourneau EJ, Levenson JS, Bandyopadhyay D, Armstrong K, Sinha D. The effects of public registration on judicial decisions. Crim Justice Rev. 2010;35(3):295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Levenson JS. The new scarlet letter: Sex offender policies in the 21st century. In: Prescott D, editor. Applying knowledge to practice: challenges in the treatment and supervision of sexual behavior. Oklahoma City, OK: Wood and Barnes Publishing; 2007. p. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levenson JS, Zgoba K. Community protection policies and repeat sexual offenses in Florida. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015;60(10):1140–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mann RE, Hanson RK, Thornton DT. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sex Abuse-J Res Tr. 2010;22:191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D’Orazio D, Azizian A, Olver M. Recidivism and other outcomes of sexual offenders committed as “Sexually Violent Predators” in California. ATSA 38th Annual Research and Treatment Conference. Presentation at conference. Atlanta, Georgia. 2019.

  26. • Lowe G, Willis G. “Sex offender” versus “person”: the influence of labels on willingness to volunteer with people who have sexually abused. Sexual Abuse. 2020;32(5):591–613. This research shows the negative impact labeling has on public opinion and the likelihood of helping individuals that have perpetrated sex offenses.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons-Pollard N, Moriarty L. Cyberstalking: what’s the big deal. Controversies in victimology. 2018;2:103-113.

  28. Parsons J, Bergin T. The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims’ mental health. J Trauma Stress. 2010;23(2):182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. • Gannon TA, Olver ME, Mallion JS, James M. Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;73:1–18. A large meta-analysis shows that psychological treatment programs for sexual and non sexual offending reduce recidivism and those that adhere to RNR principles are associated with more significant decreases in recidivism.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sandler JC, Freeman NJ, Socia KM. Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2008;14(4):284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. La Ganga M. Megan’s Law listing may be tied to slaying. 2007, Dec. 10. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-dec-10-me-molester10-story.html.

  32. Morrison P. Megan’s Law of unintended consequences. 2007, Dec. 13. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-dec-13-oe-morrison13-story.html.

  33. Hoggard C. Hidden in plain sight?: a multi-million dollar decision about sexually violent predators. 2017, Feb. 16. Retrieved from https://abc30.com/sexual-predators-sex-offenders-fresno-county-snyder/1759137/.

  34. People v. Superior court (Karsai), 213 Cal. App. 4th 774 (2013).

  35. San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department. Community meeting regarding sexually violent predator RLW being ordered to live in Joshua Tree [Facebook Live Recording]. 2019, Oct 19. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/sbcountysheriff/videos/576219716451986/?v=576219716451986.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Coast Clinical and Forensic Psychological Services, Atascadero, CA, USA

    Deirdre M. D’Orazio

Authors
  1. Deirdre M. D’Orazio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deirdre M. D’Orazio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Sexual Disorders

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Orazio, D.M. No Exceptions to the Rules: Professional Ethics Should Apply to Sexual Offender Civil Commitment Proceedings. Curr Psychiatry Rep 24, 741–748 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01397-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01397-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation