Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Erythroleukemia: an Update

  • Leukemia (A Aguayo, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

Acute erythroleukemia (AEL) is a rare form of acute myeloid leukemia recognized by erythroblastic proliferation. Many controversies remain around diagnosis influencing prognostic and therapeutic implications relating to this unique leukemia subset.

Recent Findings

The 2016 WHO classification includes more clear and restrictive diagnostic criteria for AEL. Primary acute erythroid leukemia is associated with complex and high-risk karyotypes including chromosomes 5q and 7q abnormalities. Mutational data shows that AEL is characterized by far lower NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutation rates and higher mutational rates in TP53 compared with other AML subtypes. Hypomethylating agents have shown therapeutic value in AEL.

Summary

In this article, we discuss the evolving diagnostic concepts of erythroleukemia, genomics, clinical outcome, and promising therapeutic targets through an appraisal of the current literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Schwartz SO, Critchlow J. Erythremic myelosis (DI Guglielmo’s disease); critical review with report of four cases, and comments on erythroleukemia. Blood. 1952;7(8):765–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dameshek W. Some speculations on the myeloproliferative syndromes. Blood. 1951;6(4):372–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukemias. Br J Haematol. 1976;33:451–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Villeval JL, Cramer P, Lemoine F, Henri A, Bettaieb A, Bernaudin F, et al. Phenotype of early erythroblastic leukemias. Blood. 1986;68(5):1167–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kowal-Vern A, Cotelingam J, Schumacher HR. The prognostic significance of proerythroblasts in acute erythroleukemia. The prognostic significance of proerythroblasts in acute erythroleukemia. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992;98(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazzella FM, Kowal-Vern A, Shrit MA, Wibowo AL, Rector JT, Cotelingam JT. et alR. Acute erythroleukemia: evaluation of 48 cases with reference to classification, cell proliferation, cytogenetics, and prognosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;110(5):590–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:626–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunning RD, Matutes E, Flandrin G, Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW. et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia not otherwise categorised., World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, 2001 Lyon, FranceI ARC Press(pg. 91-105)

  9. Arber DA, Brunning RD, Orazi A, Porwit A, Peterson L, Thiele J, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia, not otherwise specified. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al., editors. WHO Classifiction of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC; 2008. p. 134–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos FPS, Bueso-Ramos CE, Ravandi F. Acute erythroleukemia: diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Hematol. 2010;3(6):705–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnard DR, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, Lange R, Woods WG. Children’s Oncology Group Comparison of childhood myelodysplastic syndrome, AML FAB M6 or M7, CCG 2891: report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(1):17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasserjian RB, Zuo Z, Garcia C, Tang G, Kasyan A, Luthra R, et al. Acute erythroid leukemia: a reassessment using criteria refined in the 2008 WHO classification. Blood. 2010;115(10):1985–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olopade OI, Thangavelu M, Larson RA, Mick R, Kowal-Vern A, Schumacher HR, et al. Clinical, morphologic, and cytogenetic characteristics of 26 patients with acute erythroblastic leukemia. Blood. 1992;80:2873–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Hasserjian RP, Kroft SH, Harrington AM, Wheaton SE, Pildain A, et al. Pure Erythroid Leukemia and Erythroblastic Sarcoma Evolving From Chronic Myeloid Neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145(4):538–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Domingo-Claros A, Larriba I, Rozman M, Irriguible D, Vallespí T, Aventin A, et al. Acute erythroid neoplastic proliferations. A biological study based on 62 patients. Haematologica. 2002;87(2):148–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. • Reinig EF, Greipp PT, Chiu A, Howard MT, Reichard KK. De novo pure erythroid leukemia: refining the clinicopathologic and cytogenetic characteristics of a rare entity. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:705–17 This series of pure erythroid leukemia illustrates high rate of very complex karyotype in this disease.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sondergaard-Petersen H Erythrophagocytosis by pathological erythroblasts in the Di Guglielmo syndrome. A study of 18 cases. Scand J Haematol. 1974;13(4):260-5. (19). Histopathology 2017, 71, 316-321

  19. Hasserjian RP. Erythroleukemia and Its Differential Diagnosis. Surg Path Clin. 2013;6:641–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greaves MF, Sieff C, Edwards PA. Monoclonal antiglycophorin as a probe for erythroleukemias. Blood. 1983;61(4):645–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta AD, Dhond SR. Phenotypic heterogeneity of erythroblasts in erythroblastic leukemia revealed by monoclonal antibodies. Am J Hematol. 1988;29(1):12–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Garand R, Duchayne E, Blanchard D, Robillard N, Kuhlein E, Fenneteau O, et al. Minimally differentiated erythroleukaemia (AML M6 ‘variant’): a rare subset of AML distinct from AML M6. Groupe Français d'Hématologie Cellulaire. Br J Haematol. 1995;90(4):868–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. • Lee WY, Weinberg OW, Pinkus GS. GATA1 Is a sensitive and specific Nuclear marker for erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;147(4):420–6 This study shows that blasts in acute erythroleukemia exhibit intense nuclear GATA1 positivity.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong E, Ling V, Westerman D, Morgan S, Juneja S. How unique is pure erythroid leukaemia? A retrospective analysis of seven cases and review of the literature. JCP. 2015;68:301–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. • Wang SA, Patel KP, Pozdnyakova O, Peng J, Zuo Z, Dal Cin P, et al. Acute erythroid leukemia with <20% bone marrow blasts is clinically and biologically similar to myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:1221–31 The results of this study supports WHO change in definition of acute erythroid leukemia.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lessard M, Struski S, Leymarie V, Flandrin G, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Mozziconacci MJ, et al. Cytogenetic study of 75 erythroleukemias. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005;163:113–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grossmann V, Bacher U, Haferlach C, Schnittger S, Pötzinger F, Weissmann S, et al. Acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) can be separated into distinct prognostic subsets based on cytogenetic and molecular genetic characteristics. Leukemia. 2013;27(9):1940–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cervera N, Carbuccia N, Garnier S, Guille A, Adélaïde J, Murati A, et al. Molecular characterization of acute erythroid leukemia (M6-AML) using targeted next-generation sequencing. Leukemia. 2016;30:966–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ko PS, Liu YC, Yeh CM, Gau JP, Yu YB, Hsiao LT, et al. The uniqueness of morphological features of pure erythroid leukemia in myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance: A reassessment using criteria revised in the 2016 World Health Organization classification. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. • Rose D, Haferlach T, Schnittger S, Perglerová K, Kern W, Haferlach C. Subtype-specific patterns of molecular mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2017;31(1):11–7 This study illustrates mutation profile in acute erythroleukemia.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. •• Montalban-Bravo G, Benton CB, Wang SA, Ravandi F, Kadia T, Cortes J, et al. More than 1 TP53 abnormality is a dominant characteristic of pure erythroid leukemia. Blood. 2017;129(18):2584–7 This study illustrates high rate of TP53 mutations in acute erythroleukemia.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. •• Iacobucci I, Wen J, Meggendorfer M, Choi JK, et al. Genomic subtyping and therapeutic targeting of acute erythroleukemia. Nat Genet. 2019;51:694–704 This large study compares genomic features of pediatric and adult acute erythroleukemia.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Panagopoulos I, Micci F, Thorsen J, Haugom L, Buechner J, Kerndrup G, et al. Fusion of ZMYND8 and RELA genes in acute erythroid leukemia. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Colita A, Belhabri A, Chelghoum Y, Charrin C, Fiere D, Thomas X. Prognostic factors and treatment effects on survival in acute myeloid leukemia of M6 subtype: a retrospective study of 54 cases. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(4):451–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Santos F, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G, Koller C, Beran M, O'Brien S, et al. Adult Acute Erythroleukemia: An Analysis of 108 patients treated at a single institution. Leukemia. 2009;23(12):227–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Greco R, Petrungaro A, Recchia AG, De Stefano L, Bossio S, Palummo A, et al. Treatment Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Cytoreductive Chemotherapy Cytarabine (Ara-C) Followed Azacitidine (AZA) Maintenance: A Real Life Single Center Experience. Blood. 2016;128(22):5204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Welch JS, Petti AA, Miller CA, Fronick CC, O'Laughlin M, Fulton RS, et al. TP53 and Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM. 2016;375(21):2023–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. •• Almeida AM, Prebet T, Itzykson R, Ramos F, Al-Ali H, Shammo J, et al. Clinical Outcomes of 217 Patients with Acute Erythroleukemia According to Treatment Type and Line: A Retrospective Multinational Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4):837 This study supports use of HMAs in acute erythroleukemia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Peng J, Hasserjian RP, Tang G, Patel KP, Goswami M, Jabbour EJ, et al. Myelodysplastic syndromes following therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs): development of acute erythroleukemia may not influence assessment of treatment response. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57(4):812–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga K. Weinberg.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

Neither of the authors has any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Leukemia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weinberg, O.K., Arber, D.A. Erythroleukemia: an Update. Curr Oncol Rep 23, 69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01060-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01060-8

Keywords

Navigation