Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perception of Lung Cancer Risk: Impact of Smoking Status and Nicotine Dependence

  • Supplement
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The general population is nowadays well aware that tobacco smoking dramatically increases the risk of developing lung cancer. We hypothesized that a personal history of smoking and the level of nicotine dependence in current smokers may affect the perception of this risk among healthy individuals.

Methods

The fourth French nationwide observational survey, EDIFICE 4, was conducted by telephone among a representative sample of individuals (N = 1602) aged between 40 and 75 years. Interviewees were asked about their smoking habits, perception of the risk of lung cancer, and nicotine dependence (Fagerström test).

Results

Regardless of their smoking status or level of nicotine dependence, the majority (96%) of our study population (N = 1463) acknowledged that tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for lung cancer. For 34% of all respondents, smoking ≤ 10 cigarettes per day does not carry any risk of lung cancer. Only half the current smokers considered themselves to be at higher risk of lung cancer than the average-risk population. The majority of current cigarette smokers with a nicotine dependence considered themselves to be at higher risk for lung cancer while only 37% of non-nicotine-dependent individuals had the same perception (P < 0.01). Current smokers were more likely to consider a screening examination than former smokers and never-smokers. However, the intention to undergo screening was not significantly affected by the level of nicotine dependence.

Conclusions

Awareness campaigns may first have to overcome misconceptions about light smoking and, secondly, to target specific populations (heavy smokers, those with a long history, highly dependent smokers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Institut National du cancer (INCa). ©Les cancers en France, Les Données, janvier 2014.

  3. Hecht SS. Lung carcinogenesis by tobacco smoke. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(12):2724–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Guignard R, Beck F, Richard J-B et al. La consommation de tabac en France en 2014: caractéristiques et évolutions récentes. Evolution- INPES. 2015(Janvier). Available at inpes.santepubliquefrance.fr/CFESBases/catalogue/pdf/1623.pdf

  5. FCTC WHO framework convention on tobacco control. WHO framework convention on Tobacco Control2003. Available at www.who.int/fctc/text_download/en/

  6. Institut national du cancer (INCa). Plan cancer 2014-2019, guérir et prévenir les cancers: donnons les mêmes chances à tous, partout en France. 2014.

  7. Deville J. A theory of quota surveys. Survey Methodol. 1991;17(2):163–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roussel C, Touboul C. Large population survey: strengths and limits. Methodology of the EDIFICE survey. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011;20(Suppl 1):S5–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cej.0000391561.10889.28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazieres J, Pujol JL, Kalampalikis N, et al. Perception of lung cancer among the general population and comparison with other cancers. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(3):420–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0000000000000433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck F, Richard J-B. Les Comportements de santé des jeunes. Analyses du Baromètre santé 2010. Saint-Denis: Inpes 2013. Available at inpes.santepubliquefrance.fr/CFESBases/catalogue/pdf/1452.pdf.

  12. Weinstein ND, Marcus SE, Moser RP. Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tob Control. 2005;14(1):55–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McCoy SB, Gibbons FX, Reis TJ, Gerrard M, Luus CAE, von Wald Sufka A Perceptions of smoking risk as a function of smoking status. J Behav Med 1992;15(5):469–488, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844942.

  14. Strecher VJ, Kreuter MW, Kobrin SC. Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks? J Behav Med. 1995;18(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. • Masiero M, Lucchiari C, Pravettoni G. Personal fable: optimistic bias in cigarette smokers. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2015;4(1):e20939. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba.20939. A recent demonstration of a cognitive bias in smokers, which negatively affects the perception of risk associated with smoking.

  16. Silvestri GA, Nietert PJ, Zoller J, Carter C, Bradford D. Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts. Thorax. 2007;62(2):126–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2005.056036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cataldo JK. High-risk older smokers’ perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about lung cancer screening. Cancer Med. 2016;5(4):753–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439N). 5 February 2015. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=274.

  19. • The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365(5):395–409. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. This study assessed the efficacy of low-dose CT screening to potentially reduce mortality from lung cancer.

Download references

Acknowledgements

EDIFICE surveys were funded by Roche S.A. Medical writing assistance was provided by Potentiel d’Action.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Greillier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Laurent Greillier has received honoraria from Roche.

Alexis B. Cortot has received honoraria from Roche.

Jérôme Viguier declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Lysel Brignoli-Guibaudet has received honoraria from Roche.

Christine Lhomel is an employee of Roche.

François Eisinger has received honoraria from Roche.

Jean-François Morère has received honoraria from Roche.

Sébastien Couraud has received honoraria from Roche.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

Protection of personal data was ensured in line with the European Directives. A consent form validated by the French Data-Protection Watchdog (CNIL [Commission nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés]) was read to each interviewee. The survey was carried out in accordance with the international code of ethics governing opinion polls.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greillier, L., Cortot, A.B., Viguier, J. et al. Perception of Lung Cancer Risk: Impact of Smoking Status and Nicotine Dependence. Curr Oncol Rep 20 (Suppl 1), 18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-017-0650-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-017-0650-1

Keywords

Navigation