Skip to main content
Log in

The Complexity of Masked Hypertension: Diagnostic and Management Challenges

  • Blood Pressure Monitoring and Management (G Ogedegbe and JA Staessen, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Masked hypertension, defined as discordant in-office normotension versus out-of-office hypertension, is present in approximately 10 % to 40 % of patients not receiving antihypertensive treatment. Not only are persons with prehypertension more likely to have masked hypertension, but they also frequently develop target organ damage before transitioning to established sustained hypertension. Moreover, the percentage of persons with masked hypertension increases in the presence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or chronic renal failure. The gold standard for diagnosing masked hypertension is the 24-hour ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM), but home BP monitoring (HBPM) has also been a useful alternative procedure. Importantly, initiating antihypertensive treatment exclusively with the use of in-office BP monitoring may result in almost one-third of patients remaining with high-risk masked uncontrolled hypertension, which underscores the importance of HBPM and ABPM as supplements to in-office BP monitoring for the effective treatment of hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Pickering TG, Davidson K, Gerin W, Schwartz JE. Masked hypertension. Hypertension. 2002;40:795–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1731–68. These are the latest European guidelines for ABPM, with excellent summaries of important clinical issues.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobrie G, Clerson P, Menard J, Postel-Vinay N, Chatellier G, Plouin PF. Masked hypertension: a systolic review. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1715–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Franklin SS, Thijs L, Li Y, Hansen TW, Boggia J, Liu Y, et al. Masked hypertension in Diabetes. Treatment implications for clinical practice. Hypertension. 2013;61:964–71. This study explains the rationale for the increased prevalence of masked hypertension with antihypertensive treatment.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Asayama K, Obara T, Hashimoto J, et al. Prognosis of “masked “hypertension and “white-coat” hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:508–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alwan H, Pruijm M, Ponte B, Ackermann D, Guessous I, Ehret G, et al. Epidemiology of masked and white-coat hypertension: The Family-Based SKIPOGH study. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cacciolati C, Tzourio C, Hanon O. Blood pressure variability in elderly persons with white-coat and masked hypertension compared to those with normotension and sustained hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26:367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Trevano FQ, Dell’Oro R, Bolla G, Cuspidi C, et al. Neurogenic abnormalities in masked hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;50:537–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koroboki E, Manios E, Psaltopoulou T, Vemmos K, Michas F, Alexaki E, et al. Circadian variation of blood pressure and heart rate in normotensives, white-coat, masked, treated and untreated hypertensives. Hell J Cardiol. 2012;53:432–8. This is the first study to use ABPM for evaluating circadian patterns of white-coat and masked hypertension.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lurbe E, Torro I, Alvarez V, Nawrot T, Paya R, Redon J, et al. Prevalence, Persistence, and clinical significance of masked hypertension in youth. Hypertension. 2005;45:493–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lurbe E, Thijs L, Torro MI, Alvarez J, Staessen JA, Redon J. Sexual dimorphism in the transition from masked to sustained hypertension in healthy youths. Hypertension. 2013;62:410–4. Masked hypertension was shown to be a frequent precursor to sustained hypertension, but predominantly in boys.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SH, Kim JH, Kang MJ, Lee YA, Yang SW, Shin CH. Implications of nocturnal hypertension in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Care. 2011;34:2180–5. This study showed the value of ABPM to detect nocturnal hypertension as a sign of masked hypertension in young juvenile diabetics, frequently with early evidence of hypertensive target organ damage.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Veerabhadrappa P, Diaz KM, Feairheller DL, Sturgeon KM, Williamson ST, Crabbe DL, et al. Endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation in African Americans with masked-hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:1102–7. African-Americans with prehypertension have a high prevalence of masked hypertension in association with early evidence of vascular disease.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mezick EJ, Hall M, Matthews KA. Sleep duration and ambulatory blood pressure in black and white adolescents. Hypertension. 2012;59:747–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pogue V, Rahman M, Lipkowitz M, Toto R, Miller E, Faulkner M, et al. Disparate estimates of hypertension control from ambulatory and clinic blood pressure measurements in hypertensive kidney disease. Hypertension. 2009;53:20–7. African-Americans participating in the AASK trial had a high percentage of masked uncontrolled hypertension in association with nocturnal non-dipping or rising BP patterns.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hänninen MR, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Kesäniemi YA, Kähönen M, Jula AM. Target organ damage and masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1136–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeno K, Mita T, Nakayama S, Goto H, Komiya K, Abe H, et al. Masked hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study. Am J Hypertens. 2012;45:165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leitão CB, Canani LH, Kramer CK, Boza JC, Pinotti AF, Gross JL. Masked hypertension, urinary albumin excretion rate, and echocardiographic parameters in putatively normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Care. 2007;30:1255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitsnefes M, Flynn J, Cohn S, Samuels J, Blydt-Hansen T, Saland J, et al. Masked hypertension associates with left ventricular hypertrophy in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:137–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Agarwal R, Sinha AD, Light RP. Toward a definition of masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension among hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2003–8. There is high risk of cardiovascular events in dialysis patients, especially in the presence of masked or sustained hypertension.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sega R, Trocino G, Lanzarotti A, Carugo S, Cesana G, Schiavina R, et al. Alterations in cardiac structure in patients with isolated office, ambulatory, or home hypertension. Circulation. 2001;104:1385–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Grant FC, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomized parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:286–94. Myers and colleagues pioneered the use of animated measurements of BP in primary care offices as more accurate than manual methods.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers MG, Godwin M. Automated office blood pressure. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. The conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial: masked hypertension sub-study. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1937–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pickering TG, Gerin W, Schwartz, Spruill TM, Davidson KW. Franz Volhard lecture: should doctors still measure blood pressure? The missing patients with masked hypertension. J Hypertens. 2008;26:2259–67. This is a classic presentation by Pickering and colleagues that defines the natural history of masked hypertension.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lovibond K, Jowett S, Barton P, Caulfield M, Heneghan C, Hobbs FD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a modeling study. Lancet. 2011;378:1219–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pierdomenico SD, Pannarale G, Rabbia F, Lapenna D, Licitra R, Zito M, et al. Prognostic relevance of masked hypertension in subjects with prehypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:679–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimbo D, Newman JD, Schwartz JE. Masked hypertension and prehypertension: diagnostic overlap and interrelationships with left ventricular mass: the Masked Hypertension study. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25:664–71. This study clearly showed that detection of masked hypertension was substantially higher when screening persons with high-normal BP versus normotensives.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Myers MG, Stergiou GS. Reporting bias: Achilles’ heel of home blood pressure monitoring. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:350–7.

  30. Niiranen TJ, Hanninen MR, Johansson J, Reunanen A, Jula AM. Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn-Home study. Hypertension. 2010;55:1346–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hänninen MR, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Mattila AK, Jula AM. Determinants of masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1880–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stergiou GS, Asayama K, Thijs L, Kollias A, Niiranen TJ, Hozawa A, et al. Prognosis of white-coat and masked hypertension. International Database of Home Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcome. Hypertension. 2014;63;(on line). This five-population longitudinal study demonstrated that HBPM is comparable to ABPM in predicting cardiovascular outcome in masked and white-coat hypertension.

  33. Stergiou GS, Salgami EV, Tzamouranis DG, Roussias LG. Masked hypertension assessed by ambulatory blood pressure versus home blood pressure monitoring: is it the same phenomenon? Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:772–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaborieau V, Delarche N, Gosse P. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus self-measurement of blood pressure at home: correlation with target organ damage. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1919–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kario K. Diagnosis of true uncontrolled hypertension using both home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens. 2013;28:176–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, Guo B, Hobbs FD, Deeks JJ, et al. Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of Hypertension: systematic review. BMJ. 2011;342:3621–38. This meta-analysis showed that in comparison to ABPM, neither in-office measurement of BP nor HBPM had sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be recommended as a single diagnostic test for making hypertension treatment decisions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Destounis A, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou E, Kollias A, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring alone vs. combined clinic and ambulatory measurements in following treatment-induced changes in blood pressure and organ damage. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:184–92. This is a novel randomized controlled trial comparing two different BP monitoring techniques on the treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ishikawa J, Hoshide S, Eguchi K, Ishikawa S, Shimada K, Kario K, et al. Nighttime home blood pressure and the risk of hypertensive target organ damage. Hypertension. 2012;60:921–8. This is the first study to show that HBPM, using a monitor with a timer function to measure nighttime BP, was comparable to ABPM in assessing hypertensive target organ damage.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Banegas JR, Ruilope LM, de la Sierra A, de la Cruz JJ, Gorostidi M, Segura JS, et al. High prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension in people with treated hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2014;10:(on line). This large population study supports ABPM as the diagnostic test of choice to ensure that high-risk patients are properly treated to goal.

Download references

Acknowledgment

A special thank you to Dr. Kei Asayama for taking the time to review this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Stanley S. Franklin and Nathan D. Wong declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanley S. Franklin.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Management

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franklin, S.S., Wong, N.D. The Complexity of Masked Hypertension: Diagnostic and Management Challenges. Curr Hypertens Rep 16, 474 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-014-0474-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-014-0474-4

Keywords

Navigation