Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Psychosocial Interventions on Outcomes for Caregivers of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients

  • Health Economics (N Khera, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients are required to have a caregiver present for up to 100 days post-transplant. Caregivers provide essential support during HCT but experience immense stress and burden. Increasing research has developed interventions for HCT caregivers. This review systematically evaluates psychosocial interventions for caregivers of HCT patients.

Recent Findings

The search yielded 12 studies (7 efficacy and 5 feasibility studies) enrolling 931 caregivers. Interventions were feasible and acceptable as evidenced by high rates of completion (70–100%) with attrition due to patient morbidity or mortality. Feasibility was augmented by flexible delivery (in-person, teleconference, smartphones, or Web-based platforms). Acceptability was demonstrated by objective measures of satisfaction. Effectiveness was found for fatigue and mental health service use, but not for burden, sleep-quality, and inconsistently for caregiver depression, anxiety, coping, and quality of life.

Summary

Psychosocial interventions are feasible, acceptable, and show mixed effects on HCT caregiver outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Majhail NS, Tao L, Bredeson C, Davies S, Dehn J, Gajewski JL, et al. Prevalence of hematopoietic cell transplant survivors in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(10):1498–501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster LW, McLellan L, Rybicki L, Dabney J, Copelan E, Bolwell B. Validating the positive impact of in-hospital lay care-partner support on patient survival in allogeneic BMT: a prospective study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(5):671–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster LW, McLellan LJ, Rybicki LA, Sassano DA, Hsu A, Bolwell BJ. Survival of patients who have undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: the relative importance of in-hospital lay care-partner support. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2005;22(2):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooke L, Grant M, Eldredge DH, Maziarz RT, Nail LM. Informal caregiving in hematopoietic blood and marrow transplant patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(5):500–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Siston AK, List MA, Daugherty CK, Banik DM, Menke C, Cornetta K, et al. Psychosocial adjustment of patients and caregivers prior to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27(11):1181–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Von Ah D, Spath M, Nielsen A, Fife B. The Caregiver’s role across the bone marrow transplantation trajectory. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(1):E12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eldredge DH, Nail LM, Maziarz RT, Hansen LK, Ewing D, Archbold PG. Explaining family caregiver role strain following autologous blood and marrow transplantation. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24(3):53–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop MM, Beaumont JL, Hahn EA, Cella D, Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ, et al. Late effects of cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on spouses or partners compared with survivors and survivor-matched controls. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(11):1403–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Langer S, Abrams J, Syrjala K. Caregiver and patient marital satisfaction and affect following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal investigation. Psychooncology. 2003;12(3):239–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gemmill R, Cooke L, Williams AC, Grant M. Informal caregivers of hematopoietic cell transplant patients: a review and recommendations for interventions and research. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(6):E13–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarus RSL, Folkman S. Stress appraisal, and coping. Springer: Publishing Company; 1984. 466 p.

  12. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 20]. Available from: http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/.

  14. Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Dec [cited 2018 Feb 13];5(1). Available from: http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x.

  15. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

  17. Pensak NA, Joshi T, Simoneau T, Kilbourn K, Carr A, Kutner J, et al. Development of a Web-based intervention for addressing distress in caregivers of patients receiving stem cell transplants: formative evaluation with qualitative interviews and focus groups. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(6):e120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. • Simoneau TL, Kilbourn K, Spradley J, Laudenslager ML. An evidence-based stress management intervention for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant caregivers: development, feasibility and acceptability. Support Care Cancer. 2017;10:1–9. Provides important explanaiton of feasibility study.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heermann JA, Eilers JG, Carney PA. Use of modified OSCEs to verify technical skill performance and competency of lay caregivers. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16(2):93–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Metoyer LJ. Education of hematopoietic stem cell transplant caregivers in preparation for their role. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2013;4(6):432–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bevans M, Castro K, Prince P, Shelburne N, Prachenko O, Loscalzo M, et al. An individualized dyadic problem-solving education intervention for patients and family caregivers during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a feasibility study. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33(2):E24–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bevans M, Wehrlen L, Castro K, Prince P, Shelburne N, Soeken K, et al. A problem-solving education intervention in caregivers and patients during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Health Psychol. 2014;19(5):602–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc T, VanDusen H, Traeger L, Greer JA, Pirl WF, et al. Effect of inpatient palliative care on quality of life 2 weeks after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2094–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fife BL, Von Ah DM, Spath ML, Weaver MT, Yang Z, Stump T, et al. Preliminary efficacy of a brief family intervention to prevent declining quality of life secondary to parental bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(2):285–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Laudenslager ML, Simoneau TL, Kilbourn K, Natvig C, Philips S, Spradley J, et al. A randomized control trial of a psychosocial intervention for caregivers of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: effects on distress. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(8):1110–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laudenslager ML, Simoneau TL, Philips S, Benitez P, Natvig C, Cole S. A randomized controlled pilot study of inflammatory gene expression in response to a stress management intervention for stem cell transplant caregivers. J Behav Med. 2016;39(2):346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ouseph R, Croy C, Natvig C, Simoneau T, Laudenslager ML. Decreased mental health care utilization following a psychosocial intervention in caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Ment Illn [Internet]. 2014 Mar 25 [cited 2017 May 24];6(1). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4253397/.

  28. Rexilius SJ, Mundt C, Erickson Megel M, Agrawal S. Therapeutic effects of massage therapy and handling touch on caregivers of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(3):E35–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Henig I, Zuckerman T. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation—50 years of evolution and future perspectives. Rambam Maimonides Med J [Internet]. 2014 Oct 29 [cited 2018 Feb 20];5(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222417/.

  30. Kim Y, Carver CS, Spiegel D, Mitchell H-R, Cannady RS. Role of family caregivers’ self-perceived preparedness for the death of the cancer patient in long-term adjustment to bereavement. Psychooncology. 2017;26(4):484–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, Litzelman K, Chou W-YS, Shelburne N, et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122(13):1987–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Burns LJ, Abbetti B, Arnold SD, Bender J, Doughtie S, El-Jawahiri A, et al. Engaging patients in setting a patient-centered outcomes research agenda in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant [Internet]. 2018 Feb 2 [cited 2018 Mar 1];0(0). Available from: http://www.bbmt.org/article/S1083-8791(18)30046-6/fulltext.

  33. • Langer S, Lehane C, Yi J. Patient and caregiver adjustment to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review of dyad-based studies. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017. Provides a systematic review of dyad-based studies.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren R. Bangerter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Health Economics

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bangerter, L.R., Griffin, J.M., Langer, S. et al. The Effect of Psychosocial Interventions on Outcomes for Caregivers of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 13, 155–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-018-0445-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-018-0445-y

Keywords

Navigation