Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a Best Initial Treatment for a New Patient With Low Grade Follicular Lymphoma

  • B-cell NHL, T-cell NHL, and Hodgkin Lymphoma (J Armitage, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment landscape for newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) has dramatically changed over the past decade, first with the advent of rituximab and then with the activity of old and new drugs, like bendamustine and lenalidomide, in this disease. The efficacy and tolerability of rituximab has led to a paradigm shift for the management of patients with low volume FL for many oncologists. Despite the lack of a survival benefit seen with this approach, many now use this single agent in patients who had historically been observed. Likewise, its use as maintenance therapy following successful front-line induction therapy of patients with symptomatic FL, with either rituximab alone or specific chemoimmunotherapy regimens, has improved remission duration and widely been adopted. As newer chemoimmunotherapy regimens, like bendamustine and rituximab, have superior outcomes with improved tolerability, upfront treatment options are redefined and questions emerge: whom do maintenance strategies benefit, and what is the optimal sequencing of therapies? Finally, as newer targeted and potentially better tolerated therapies demonstrate efficacy in the relapsed setting, their use, both in combination with and in place of chemotherapy, is being explored. The promising regimen of lenalidomide with rituximab is being compared with chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized fashion. Cure remains elusive, however, in advanced stage disease and so safety and tolerability, in addition to efficacy, remain important endpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Ardeshna KM, Smith P, Norton A, et al. Long-term effect of a watch and wait policy versus immediate systemic treatment for asymptomatic advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9383):516–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brice P, Bastion Y, Lepage E, et al. Comparison in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphomas between an initial no-treatment policy, prednimustine, or interferon alfa: a randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clini Oncol Off Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):1110–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Young RC, Longo DL, Glatstein E, Ihde DC, Jaffe ES, DeVita Jr VT. The treatment of indolent lymphomas: watchful waiting v aggressive combined modality treatment. Semin Hematol. 1988;25(2 Suppl 2):11–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fallah J, Thomas AG, Olszewksi AJ. Watchful waiting as initial management of advanced-stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Blood. 2015;126(23):a2692.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ardeshna KM, Qian W, Smith P, et al. Rituximab versus a watch-and-wait approach in patients with advanced-stage, asymptomatic, non-bulky follicular lymphoma: an open-label randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):424–35. This randomized trial of observation v rituximab with or without rituximab maintenance in low tumor burden FL patients who would otherwise have been observed demonstrated a progression free survival (PFS) and quality of life benefit to early rituximab therapy. Although there was no difference in survival and we lack data regarding response to subsequent therapies, this study has changed the practice of many oncologists.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahl BS, Hong F, Williams ME, et al. Rituximab extended schedule or re-treatment trial for low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma: eastern cooperative oncology group protocol e4402. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2014;32(28):3096–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones SE, Grozea PN, Metz EN, et al. Improved complete remission rates and survival for patients with large cell lymphoma treated with chemoimmunotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1983;51(6):1083–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hiddemann W, Kneba M, Dreyling M, et al. Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 2005;106(12):3725–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcus R, Imrie K, Belch A, et al. CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma. Blood. 2005;105(4):1417–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herold M, Haas A, Srock S, et al. Rituximab added to first-line mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, and prednisolone chemotherapy followed by interferon maintenance prolongs survival in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: an East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2007;25(15):1986–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus R, Imrie K, Solal-Celigny P, et al. Phase III study of R-CVP compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone alone in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(28):4579–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Salles G, Mounier N, de Guibert S, et al. Rituximab combined with chemotherapy and interferon in follicular lymphoma patients: results of the GELA-GOELAMS FL2000 study. Blood. 2008;112(13):4824–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9873):1203–10. This randomized clinical trial compared bendamustine-rituximab (BR) to CHOP-R (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone, rituximab) as upfront treatment in patients with multiple lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma, and demonstrated superiority for BR in terms of PFS and tolerability, thus supporting it as a new standard of care for the upfront treatment of advanced stage, high tumor volume FL.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flinn IW, van der Jagt R, Kahl BS, et al. Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study. Blood. 2014;123(19):2944–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Federico M, Luminari S, Dondi A, et al. R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: results of the FOLL05 trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(12):1506–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Witzig TE, Vukov AM, Habermann TM, et al. Rituximab therapy for patients with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage, follicular grade I non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2005;23(6):1103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghielmini M, Schmitz SF, Cogliatti SB, et al. Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with the standard weekly x 4 schedule. Blood. 2004;103(12):4416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Colombat P, Salles G, Brousse N, et al. Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) as single first-line therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma with a low tumor burden: clinical and molecular evaluation. Blood. 2001;97(1):101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinelli G, Schmitz SF, Utiger U, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with follicular lymphoma receiving single-agent rituximab at two different schedules in trial SAKK 35/98. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(29):4480–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taverna C, Martinelli G, Hitz F, et al. Rituximab maintenance for a maximum of 5 years after single-agent rituximab induction in follicular lymphoma: results of the randomized controlled phase III trial SAKK 35/03. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salles G, Seymour JF, Offner F, et al. Rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients with high tumour burden follicular lymphoma responding to rituximab plus chemotherapy (PRIMA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9759):42–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vitolo U, Ladetto M, Boccomini C, et al. Rituximab maintenance compared with observation after brief first-line R-FND chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab consolidation in patients age older than 60 years with advanced follicular lymphoma: a phase III randomized study by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3351–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaminski MS, Tuck M, Estes J, et al. 131I-Tositumomab therapy as initial treatment for follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(5):441–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholz CW, Pinto A, Linkesch W, et al. (90)Yttrium-ibritumomab-tiuxetan as first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma: 30 months of follow-up data from an international multicenter phase II clinical trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Ame Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(3):308–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morschhauser F, Radford J, Van Hoof A, et al. 90Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan consolidation of first remission in advanced-stage follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma: updated results after a median follow-up of 7.3 years from the International, Randomized, Phase III First-Line Indolent trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(16):1977–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Press OW, Unger JM, Rimsza LM, et al. Phase III randomized intergroup trial of CHOP plus rituximab compared with CHOP chemotherapy plus (131)iodine-tositumomab for previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma: SWOG S0016. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(3):314–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fowler NH, Davis RE, Rawal S, et al. Safety and activity of lenalidomide and rituximab in untreated indolent lymphoma: an open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1311–8. This is the first published study of a non-chemotherapy based regimen for the upfront treatment of advanced stage FL, demonstrating excellent efficacy and prompting the development of a randomized trial of this regimen versus rituximab-chemotherapy for the upfront treatment of FL.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lenz G, Dreyling M, Schiegnitz E, et al. Myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission prolongs progression-free survival in follicular lymphoma: results of a prospective, randomized trial of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 2004;104(9):2667–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deconinck E, Foussard C, Milpied N, et al. High-dose therapy followed by autologous purged stem-cell transplantation and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study by GOELAMS. Blood. 2005;105(10):3817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sebban C, Mounier N, Brousse N, et al. Standard chemotherapy with interferon compared with CHOP followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: the GELF-94 randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Blood. 2006;108(8):2540–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ladetto M, De Marco F, Benedetti F, et al. Prospective, multicenter randomized GITMO/IIL trial comparing intensive (R-HDS) versus conventional (CHOP-R) chemoimmunotherapy in high-risk follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: the superior disease control of R-HDS does not translate into an overall survival advantage. Blood. 2008;111(8):4004–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Al Khabori M, de Almeida JR, Guyatt GH, Kuruvilla J, Crump M. Autologous stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(1):18–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caron A. Jacobson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on B-cell NHL, T-cell NHL, and Hodgkin Lymphoma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobson, C.A., Freedman, A.S. Is There a Best Initial Treatment for a New Patient With Low Grade Follicular Lymphoma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 11, 218–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-016-0321-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-016-0321-6

Keywords

Navigation