Abstract
Despite advances in forensic sciences, there is a significant increase in the number of cases that remain unsolved—cold cases. Cold case investigations present numerous unique challenges above and beyond those of typical (i.e., timely) investigations. In cold cases, witness memory is likely to be weakened substantially due to the historical nature of the incident (e.g., the victim of historical sexual abuse) and subject to interference from different sources (e.g., conversations with others and previous interviews). Despite the numerous and challenging barriers present within cold case investigations, researchers have not systematically explored the barriers faced by cold case investigators or the best ways of obtaining detailed and accurate information from witnesses and victims of cold cases. Solving cold cases can prevent perpetrators from committing further crimes, help bring peace to the loved ones of deceased victims, and communicate to living victims that they are not forgotten. Our goal is to generate interest in a program of rigorous experimental and applied work in this neglected field. We also aim to provide preliminary resources and practical considerations for cold case investigators based on current best practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan K, Midjord JP, Martin D, Gabbert F (2012) Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other. Mem Cognit 40:280–286
Anderson JR (1983) A spreading activation theory of memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 22(34):261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3
Association for the Prevention of Torture (2019) The Méndez principles on effective interviewing for investigations and information gathering. https://www.apt.ch/en/mendez-principles-effective-interviewing. Accessed 3 Apr 2024
Bänziger M, Killias M (2014) Unsolved homicides in Switzerland: patterns and explanations. Eur J Criminol 11(5):619–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814541338
Belli RF, Stafford FP, Alwin DF (2009) Calendar and time diary methods in life course research. Sage
Bennett K (2020) The media as an investigative resource: reflections from English cold-case units. J Crim Psychol 10(2):145–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-02-2020-0009
Blank H, Launay C (2014) How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: a meta-analysis of post-warning studies. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 3(2):77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101798
Bolger PC, Walters GD (2019) The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: a meta-analysis. J Crim Just 60:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001
Charman SD, Carol RN (2012) Age-progressed images may harm recognition of missing children by increasing the number of plausible targets. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 1(3):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.07.008
Conway MA, Jobson L (2012) On the nature of autobiographical memory. Cambridge University Press EBooks, pp 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139021937.006
Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychol Rev 107(2):261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261
Dando C (2013) Drawing to remember: External support of older adults’ eyewitness performance. PLoS ONE 8:e69937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069937
Dando CJ, Gabbert F, Hope L (2020) Supporting older eyewitnesses’ episodic memory: the self-administered interview and sketch reinstatement of context. Memory 28(6):712–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1757718
Dando CJ, Wilcock R, Behnkle C, Milne R (2011) Modifying the cognitive interview: countenancing forensic application by enhancing practicability. Psychol Crime Law 17(6):491–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903334212
Dando C, Wilcock R, Milne R (2008) The cognitive interview: inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Leg Criminol Psychol 13(1):59–70. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X162498
Dando C, Wilcock R, Milne R, Henry L (2009) A modified cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Appl Cogn Psychol 23(5):698–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1501
Davis RC, Jensen C, Kitchens KE (2011) Cold-case investigations: an analysis of current practices and factors associated with successful outcomes. RAND Corporation
Davis RC, Jensen CJ III, Burgette L, Burnett K (2014) Working smarter on cold cases: identifying factors associated with successful cold case investigations. J Forensic Sci 59(2):375–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12384
Dietze P, Powell MB, Thomson DM (2012) Examination of the effect of mental reinstatement of context across developmental level, retention interval and type of mnemonic instruction. Psychiatry Psychol Law 19(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2010.543410
Dodier O, Ginet M, Teissedre F, Verkampt F, Fisher RP (2021) Using the cognitive interview to recall real-world emotionally stressful experiences: road accidents. Applied cognitive psychology 35(4):1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3828
Drohan-Jennings DM, Roberts KP, Powell MB (2010) Mental context reinstatement increases resistance to false suggestions after children have experienced a repeated event. Psychiatry Psychol Law 17(4):594–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218711003739110
Dysart JE, Lindsay RCL (2007) The effect of delay on eyewitness identification accuracy: should we be concerned? In: Lindsay RCL, Ross DF, Don Read J, Toglia MP (eds) The handbook of eyewitness psychology: vol. 2: memory for people. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp 137–154
Eastwood J, Snook B, Luther K (2019) Establishing the most effective way to deliver the sketch procedure to enhance interviewee free recall. Psychol Crime Law 25(5):482–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416
Eastwood J, Snook B, Luther K (2018) Measuring the effectiveness of the sketch procedure for recalling details of a live interactive event. Appl Cogn Psychol 32(6):747–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3454
Ebbinghaus H (1913) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10011-000
Emmett D, Clifford BR, Gwyer P (2003) An investigation of the interaction between cognitive style and context reinstatement on the memory performance of eyewitnesses. Personality Individ Differ 34(8):1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00131-9
Erickson W, Lampinen JM, Frowd CD, Mahoney G (2017) When age-progressed images are unreliable: the roles of external features and age range. Sci Justice 57(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.006
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2017) Clearances. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/clearances
Fisher RP (1996) Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory. Behav Brain Sci 19(2):197. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00042229
Fisher RP, Falkner KL, Trevisan M, McCauley MR (2000) Adapting the cognitive interview to enhance long term recall of physical activities. J Appl Psychol 85(2):180–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.180
Fisher RP, Geiselman RE (1992) Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview. Thomas, Charles C
Fisher RP, Schreiber N (2007) Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory. In: Toglia M, Lindsay R, Ross D, Reed J (eds) The handbook of witness psychology: volume one. Memory for events. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 53–80
Frenda SJ, Nichols RM, Loftus EF (2011) Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 20(1):20–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396620
Gabbert F, Hope L (2023) The Self-Administered Interview. In: Oxburgh G, Myklebust T, Fallon M, Hartwig M (eds) Interviewing and interrogation: a review of research and practice since World War II. Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, pp 413–430
Gabbert F, Hope L, Fisher RP (2009) Protecting eyewitness evidence: examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law Hum Behav 33(4):298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
Gabbert F, MacPherson I, Hope L (2014) Adding a new mnemonic to the cognitive interview. Paper presented at the International Investigative Interviewing Research Group Conference
Gabbert F, Tamonyte D, Apps J, Caso A, Woolnough P, Hope L, Handscomb M, Waterworth G (2020) Examining the efficacy of a self-administered report form in missing person investigations. Leg Criminol Psychol 25(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12163
Glasner T, Van Der Vaart W (2009) Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: a review. Qual Quant 43(3):333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9129-8
Goldfarb D, Goodman GS, Larson RP, Eisen ML, Qin J (2019) Long-term memory in adults exposed to childhood violence: remembering genital contact nearly 20 years later. Clin Psychol Sci 7(2):381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618805742
Goldsmith M, Koriat A, Pansky A (2005) Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. J Mem Lang 52(4):505–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010
Harvey MB, Price HL, Luther K (2023) What happened that day? Recall for events of a day that later became important. J Crim Psychol. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-06-2023-0040
Harris CB, O’Connor AR (2023) On the same wavelength: the impact of other-generated cues on the reported retrieval processes and qualities of autobiographical memories. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 12(1):82–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000030
Hashtroudi S, Johnson MK, Vnek N, Ferguson SA (1993) Aging and the effects of affective and factual focus on source monitoring and recall. Psychol Aging 9(1):160–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.1.160
Hershkowitz I, Orbach Y, Lamb ME, Sternberg KJ, Horowitz D (2001) The effects of mental context reinstatement on children’s accounts of sexual abuse. Appl Cogn Psychol 15(3):235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.699
Home Office (2021) Crime outcomes in England and Wales 2020 to 2021. National Office of Statistics
Hope L, Gabbert F, Fisher RP, Jamieson K (2014) Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: the impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Appl Cogn Psychol 28:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2984
Hope L, Gabbert F, Kinninger M, Kontogianni F, Bracey A, Hanger A (2019a) Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans. Law Hum Behav 43(3):263–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000329
Hope L, Kontogianni F, Geyer K, Thomas W (2019b) Development of the reporting information about networks and groups (RING) task: a method for eliciting information from memory about associates, groups, and networks. J Forensic Pract 21(4):240–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-04-2019-0011
Hope L, Thomas W, Kontogianni F (2023) The timeline technique. In: Oxburgh G, Myklebust T, Fallon M, Hartwig M (eds) Interviewing and interrogation: a review of research and practice since World War II. Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, pp 433–455
Hope L, Ost J, Gabbert F, Healey S, Lenton E (2008) “With a little help from my friends...”: the role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica 127(2):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010
Hope L, Mullis R, Gabbert F (2013) Who? What? When? Using a timeline technique to facilitate recall of a complex event. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 2(1):20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.002
Horry R, Hughes CM, Sharma A, Gabbert F, Hope L (2021) A meta-analytic review of the self-administered interview©: quantity and accuracy of details reported on initial and subsequent retrieval attempts. Appl Cogn Psychol 35(2):428–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3753
Howe JL, Knott LM, Conway MA (2018) Memory and miscarriages of justice. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group
Ito H, Barzykowski K, Grzesik M, Gülgöz S, Gürdere C, Janssen SMJ, Khor J, Rowthorn H, Wade KA, Luna K, Albuquerque PB, Kumar D, Singh A, Cecconello WW, Cadavid S, Laird NC, Baldassari MJ, Lindsay DS, Mori K (2019) Eyewitness memory distortion following co-witness discussion: a replication of Garry, French, Kinzett, and Mori (2008) in ten countries. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 8(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.004
Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS (1992) Source monitoring. Psychol Bull 114(1):3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
Johnson MK (1997) Source monitoring and memory distortion. Philos Trans R Soc B 352(1362):1733–1745. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0156
Kassin SM (2012) Why Confessions Trump Innocence. Am Psychol 67(6):431–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028212
Keel TG (2011) Detecting clues in homicide management: a homicide “best practices” research project. Federal Bureau of Investigations, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Washington, DC
Kelley C (2014) Forgetting. In: Perfect TJ, Lindsay DS (eds) The SAGE handbook of applied memory. Sage, pp 127–144
Kirby J (2018) The sex abuse scandal surrounding USA gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/1/19/16897722/sexual-abuse-usa-gymnastics-larry-nassar-explained. Accessed 3 Apr 2024
Koenig S (Host) (2014) Serial. https://serialpodcast.org/. Accessed 3 Apr 2024
Kontogianni F, Hope L, Taylor P, Vrij A, Gabbert F (2018) The benefits of a self-generated cue mnemonic for timeline interviewing. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 7:454–461
Kontogianni F, Rubinova E, Hope L, Taylor PJ, Vrij A, Gabbert F (2021) Facilitating recall and particularisation of repeated events in adults using a multi-method interviewing format. Memory 29(4):471–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1903508
Lamb ME, Brown DA, Hershkowitz I, Orbach I, Esplin PW (2018) Tell me what happened: questioning children about abuse, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell
Lampinen JM, Arnal J, Adams K, Courtney JL, Hicks JL (2012a) Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychol Crime Law 18(4):405–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.499873
Lampinen JM, Erickson W, Frowd CD, Mahoney G (2015) Mighty morphin’ age progression: how artist, age range, and morphing influences the similarity of forensic age progressions to target individuals. Psychol Crime Law 21(10):952–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2015.1077245
Lampinen JM, Miller JT, Dehon H (2012b) Depicting the missing: prospective and retrospective person memory for age progressed images. Appl Cogn Psychol 26(2):167–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1819
Lane SP, Roussel CC, Villa D, Morita SK (2007) Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33(6):1131–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1131
Loftus EF (2005) Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learn Mem 12(4):361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
Luther K, Snook B, Eastwood J, Fisher RP (2022) Sketching: the effect of a dual-modality technique on recall performance. J Police Crim Psychol
Marsh EJ, Tversky B, Hutson MA (2005) How eyewitnesses talk about events: implications for memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 19(5):531–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1095
Mattison MLA, Dando CJ, Ormerod TC (2018) Drawing the answers: sketching to support free and probed recall by child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 22(2):181–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316669088
Mattison MLA, Dando CJ, Ormerod TC (2015) Sketching to remember: episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 45(6):1751–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2335-z
Mazerolle L, Bennett S, Davis J, Sargeant E, Manning M (2013) Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence. J Exp Criminol 9(3):245–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
Memon A, Meissner CA, Fraser J (2010) The cognitive interview: a meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychol Public Policy Law 16(4):40–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518
Middendorf CH, Macan TH (2002) Note-taking in the employment interview: effects on recall and judgments. J Appl Psychol 87(2):293–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.293
(2022) Missing and murdered indigenous women and girls in Canada. https://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/
Mueller DH, Compo NS, Molina J, Bryon A, Pimentel P (2015) Productive and counterproductive interviewing techniques: do law enforcement investigators know the difference? Psychol Public Policy Law 21(3):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000047
Nairne JS (2002) The myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Memory 10(5–6):389–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000216
Polyn SM, Norman KA, Kahana MJ (2009) A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychol Rev 116(1):129–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014420
Rickards JP, Friedman F (1978) The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemp Educ Psychol 3(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(78)90020-6
Ridley AM, Gabbert F, La Rooy DJ (2013) Suggestibility in legal contexts: what do we know. In: Ridley AM, Gabbert F, La Rooy DJ (eds) Suggestibility in legal contexts: psychological research and forensic implications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 217–228
Roach J (2017) The retrospective detective. Cognitive bias and the cold case homicide investigator. Papers from the British criminology conference, 17. http://www.britsoccrim.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/The-RetrospectiveDetective.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2024
Rossmo DK (2016) Case rethinking: a protocol for reviewing criminal investigations. Police Pract Res 17(3):212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2014.978320
Rubin DT, Wenzel A (1996) One hundred years of forgetting: a quantitative description of retention. Psychol Rev 103(4):734–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.734
Schreiber-Compo N, Gregory AH, Fisher R (2012) Interviewing behaviors in police investigators: a field study of a current US sample. Psychol Crime Law 18(4):359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.494604
Shapiro LM, Purdy TL (2005) Suggestibility and source monitoring errors: blame the interview style, interviewer consistency, and the child’s personality. Appl Cogn Psychol 19(4):489–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1093
Snook B, House JC, MacDonald S, Eastwood J (2012) Police witness interview training, supervision, and feedback: a survey of Canadian police officers. Can J Criminol Crim Justice 54(3):363–372. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2011.E.13
Statistics Canada (2022) Crime severity index and weighted clearance rates, Canada, provinces, territories and census metropolitan areas. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510002601. Accessed 3 Apr 2024
St. John P (2020) The untold story of how the Golden State killer was found: a covert operation and private DNA. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-12-08/man-in-the-window. Accessed 3 Apr 2024
Toolin K, van Langeraad A, Hoi V, Scott AJ, Gabbert F (2022) Psychological contributions to cold case investigations: a systematic review. Forensic Sci Int: Synergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100294
Tulving E (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Clarendon
Tulving E, Thomson DM (1973) Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychol Rev 80(5):352–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020071
Uzer T, Brown NR (2017) The effect of cue content on retrieval from autobiographical memory. Acta Physiol (oxf) 172:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.012
Vallano JP, Compo NS (2011) A comfortable witness is a good witness: rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Appl Cogn Psychol 25(6):960–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1789
Wells GL, Kovera MB, Douglass AB, Brewer N, Meissner CA, Wixted JT (2020) Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law Hum Behav 44(1):3–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000359
Wheeler RS, Gabbert F (2017) Using self-generated cues to facilitate recall: a narrative review. Front Psychol 8:1830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830
Wong CA, Read JD (2011) Positive and negative effects of physical context reinstatement on eyewitness recall and identification. Appl Cogn Psychol 25(1):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1605
Yaksic E (2020) Evaluating the use of data-based offender profiling by researchers, practitioners and investigative journalists to address unresolved serial homicides. J Crim Psychol 10(2):123–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-09-2019-0032
Yang H, Huang D, Wang Y, Jain AK (2019) Learning continuous face age progression: a pyramid of GANs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 43(2):499–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2019.2930985
Funding
This work was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Development Grant to Price, Luther, and Thomas (grant number 430–2021-00272) and the Canada Research Chairs Program (Price).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Price, H.L., Luther, K., Thomas, W. et al. Extracting Witness Evidence in “Cold Case” Investigations: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. J Police Crim Psych (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09666-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09666-x