Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing Risks with Newer Oral Small Molecules in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) is challenging; thus, the need for newer therapeutic options with an oral route of administration has led to the development of novel small molecules drugs (SMDs). We aim to highlight the most common Adverse events (AEs) associated with SMDs and recommendations on monitoring for AEs before and during treatment.

Recent Findings

SMDs, such as Tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, have been associated with laboratory abnormalities, infections, and risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, oral agents with greater selectivity in JAK inhibition, such as tofacitinib and upadacitinib, were later developed. Ozanimod and etrasimod, S1PR agonists, require closer safety profile monitoring by clinicians.

Summary

Multiple therapies have been recently developed with variable efficacy. However, they have been associated with AEs, and some require close monitoring prior to and during therapy. Clinicians should highlight these adverse events to patients while reassuring the safety profile of these novel SMDs for IBD is favorable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Chang JT. Pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel diseases. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2652–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raine T, Danese S. Breaking through the therapeutic ceiling: what will it take? Gastroenterology. 2022;162(5):1507–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Samanen J. Chapter 5 - similarities and differences in the discovery and use of biopharmaceuticals and small-molecule chemotherapeutics. In: Ganellin R, Roberts S, Jefferis R, editors. Introduction to biological and small molecule drug research and development. Oxford: Elsevier; 2013. p. 161–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh R, Singh S, Lillard JW Jr. Past, present, and future technologies for oral delivery of therapeutic proteins. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(7):2497–523.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallick P, et al. Regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes in infectious and inflammatory disease: implications for biologics-small molecule drug interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017;13(6):605–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sandborn WJ, et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1723–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Administration, F.a.D. FDA approves Boxed Warning about increased risk of blood clots and death with higher dose of arthritis and ulcerative colitis medicine tofacitinib (Xeljanz, Xeljanz XR). 2022 [cited 2023 11/03]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-drug-safety-podcasts/fda-approves-boxed-warning-about-increased-risk-blood-clots-and-death-higher-dose-arthritis-and#:~:text=On%20July%2026%2C%202019%2C%20FDA,in%20patients%20with%20ulcerative%20colitis.

  8. Olivera PA, et al. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases or other immune-mediated diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):1554-1573 e12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Danese S, et al. DOP42 efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with moderately-to-severely active Ulcerative Colitis: 12-week results from the Phase 2 LATTICE-UC study. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2022;16(Supplement_1):i091–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ytterberg SR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):316–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Charles-Schoeman C, et al. Risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events in phase III and long-term extension studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(9):1450–9. An integrated summary of tofacitinib safety [exposure: ≤7.8 years] concluded that AE's were stable to 7.8 years and generally <2.0 in the Overall plus P3b/4 [2020] Cohort, with the exception of herpes zoster.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandborn WJ, et al. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: an integrated summary of up to 7.8 Years of safety data from the global clinical programme. J Crohns Colitis. 2023;17(3):338–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh A, et al. Tofacitinib versus oral prednisolone for induction of remission in moderately active ulcerative colitis (ORCHID): a prospective, open-label, randomized, pilot study. J Crohn's Colitis. 2023;jjad153. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad153.

  14. Viola A, et al. Mitigating the risk of Tofacitinib-induced adverse events in the elderly population with Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohn's Colitis. 2023;jjad158. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad158.

  15. Sandborn WJ, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in active ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(7):616–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sandborn WJ, et al. Safety of tofacitinib for treatment of ulcerative colitis, based on 4.4 years of data from global clinical trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(8):1541–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lichtenstein GR, et al. Assessment of safety and efficacy of tofacitinib, stratified by age, in patients from the ulcerative colitis clinical program. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022;29(1):27–41.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Winthrop KL, et al. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: analysis of infection rates from the ulcerative colitis clinical programme. J Crohns Colitis. 2021;15(6):914–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winthrop KL, et al. Herpes zoster and tofacitinib therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(10):2675–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Winthrop KL, et al. Herpes zoster in psoriasis patients treated with tofacitinib. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(2):302–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Winthrop KL, et al. Herpes zoster infection in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24(10):2258–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrera-deGuise C, et al. JAK inhibitors: a new dawn for oral therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1089099.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sands BE, et al. Tofacitinib treatment is associated with modest and reversible increases in serum lipids in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(1):123-132 e3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li N, et al. Effect of JAK inhibitors on high- and low-density lipoprotein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41(3):677–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma C, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of oral Janus kinase inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50(1):5–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wollenhaupt J, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for up to 9.5 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a global, open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Deepak P, et al. Safety of Tofacitinib in a real-world cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(8):1592-1601 e3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bezzio C, et al. Cancer risk in patients treated with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(8):2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082197.

  29. Mahadevan U, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy clinical care pathway: a report from the American Gastroenterological Association IBD parenthood project working group. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(4):627–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahadevan U, et al. Outcomes of pregnancies with maternal/paternal exposure in the tofacitinib safety databases for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24(12):2494–500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin CM, Cooles FA, Isaacs JD. Basic mechanisms of JAK inhibition. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2020;31(Suppl 1):100–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Burmester GR, et al. Safety profile of upadacitinib over 15 000 patient-years across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. RMD Open. 2023;9(1):e002735. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002735.

  33. •• Danese S, et al. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials. Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2113–28. Pivotal trial as upadacitinib demonstrated a positive efficacy and saftey profile for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. • Sandborn WJ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of upadacitinib in a randomized trial of patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(8):2123-2138 e8. First trial in which upadicitinib showed endocscopic remissiion in patients with CD.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. •• D’Haens G, et al. Upadacitinib was efficacious and well-tolerated over 30 months in patients with Crohn’s disease in the CELEST extension study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(10):2337-2346 e3. Recent trial which showed long term benefits and enodscopical improvement in CD patients receiving upadacitinib.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Makris A, et al. The effect of upadacitinib on lipid profile and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):6894. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236894.

  37. Din S, et al. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: risk of Herpes zoster with biological therapies and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023;57(6):666–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Clarke B, et al. The safety of JAK-1 inhibitors. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(Suppl 2):ii24–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleischmann R, et al. Safety profile of upadacitinib in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: integrated post hoc analysis of the SELECT phase III rheumatoid arthritis clinical programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(9):1130–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Parmar, I.S.P.R.B.M. Upadacitinib. 2023 06/03/2023; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572088/.

  41. Administration, U.F.a.D. Drug Approval Package: ZEPOSIA. 2020 [cited 2023 October 31]; Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2020/209899Orig1s000TOC.cfm.

  42. Administration, U.F.a.D. Novel Drug Approvals for 2023. 2023 [cited 2023 October 31]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/new-drugs-fda-cders-new-molecular-entities-and-new-therapeutic-biological-products/novel-drug-approvals-2023.

  43. Danese S, Furfaro F, Vetrano S. Targeting S1P in inflammatory bowel disease: new avenues for modulating intestinal leukocyte migration. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2017;12(suppl_2):S678–86.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Choi D, Stewart AP, Bhat S. Ozanimod: a first-in-class sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Ann Pharmacother. 2022;56(5):592–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Scott FL, et al. Ozanimod (RPC1063) is a potent sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1 (S1P1) and receptor-5 (S1P5) agonist with autoimmune disease-modifying activity. Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173(11):1778–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bhat S, et al. Safety and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease advanced therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023;izad120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad120

  47. Company., B.-M.S. Ozanimod [package insert]. Princeton: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2022.

  48. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ozanimod induction and maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1754–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. •• Sandborn WJ, et al. Ozanimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(14):1280–91. Phase 3 trial in which conculuded that Ozanimod was more effective than placebo as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Armuzzi A, et al. DOP45 Long-term cardiac safety of ozanimod in phase 3 clinical program of ulcerative colitis and relapsing multiple sclerosis. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2022;16(Supplement_1):i094–5.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cree BA, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: up to 5 years of follow-up in the DAYBREAK open-label extension trial. Mult Scler J. 2022;28(12):1944–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sriwastava S, et al. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators used in multiple sclerosis: an updated review of literature. J Neurol. 2022;269(3):1678–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10910-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dubinsky MC, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in the ozanimod clinical development program in patients with ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and relapsing multiple sclerosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024;izae011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae011

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sands BE, et al. Clinician’s guide to using ozanimod for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2023;17(12):2012–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. •• Sandborn WJ, et al. Etrasimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (ELEVATE): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies. Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1159–71. Two randomized trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etrasimod in adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Inc, P.L.D.P. Velsipity-etrasimod tablet, film coated. New York: Pfizer Labs; 2023.

Download references

Funding

PD is supported by a Junior Faculty Development Award from the American College of Gastroenterology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Malek Ayoub: Concept, Initial draft and approval of final draft. Shivani Mattay: Initial draft and approval of final draft. Andres J. Yarur: Editing draft for critical edits and approval of final draft. Parakkal Deepak: Concept, Initial Draft, Editing draft for critical edits and approval of final draft and guarantor of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parakkal Deepak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Malek Ayoub: Nothing to disclose Shivani Mattay: Nothing to disclose Andres J. Yarur: Advisory board and/or consultant Takeda, Pfizer, Arena, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb and Celltrion. Parakkal Deepak: Consultant or on an advisory board for Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, CorEvitas LLC and Sandoz. He has also received funding under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the paper from Janssen, Abbvie, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Pfizer/Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squib, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Landos Pharmaceuticals and Agomab.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayoub, M., Mattay, S., Yarur, A.J. et al. Managing Risks with Newer Oral Small Molecules in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 26, 145–156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-024-00923-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-024-00923-x

Keywords

Navigation