Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Wireless Motility Capsule: a One-Stop Shop for the Evaluation of GI Motility Disorders

  • Neurogastroenterology and Motility Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract (S Rao, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wireless motility and pH capsule (WMC) provides an office-based test to simultaneously assess both regional and whole gut transit. Ingestion of this non-digestible capsule capable of measuring temperature, pH, and the pressure of its immediate surroundings allows for the measurement of gastric, small bowel, and colonic transit times in an ambulatory setting. Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the evaluation of suspected conditions of delayed gastric emptying and the evaluation of colonic transit in chronic idiopathic constipation, WMC should be considered in suspected gastrointestinal motility disorders as it provides a single study capable of simultaneously assessing for regional, multiregional, or generalized motility disorders. Specific indications for testing with the WMC should include the evaluation of suspect cases of gastroparesis, small bowel dysmotility, and slow transit constipation, as well as symptom syndromes suggestive of a multiregional or generalized gastrointestinal transit delay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American neurogastroenterology and motility society and the society of nuclear medicine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:753–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Szarka LA, Camilleri M, Vella A, et al. A stable isotope breath test with a standard meal for abnormal gastric emptying of solids in the clinic and in research. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:635–43. e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Delbende B, Perri F, Couturier O, et al. 13C-octanoic acid breath test for gastric emptying measurement. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonapace ES, Maurer AH, Davidoff S, Krevsky B, Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Whole gut transit scintigraphy in the clinical evaluation of patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2838–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Argenyi EE, Soffer EE, Madsen MT, Berbaum KS, Walkner WO. Scintigraphic evaluation of small bowel transit in healthy subjects: inter- and intrasubject variability. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:938–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilberg S, Pieramico O, Malfertheiner P. The H2-lactulose breath test in the diagnosis of intestinal transit time. Leber Magen Darm. 1990;20:129–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gollub MJ. When doing a small-bowel series, what is considered a normal transit time for barium to reach the cecum? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szarka LA, Camilleri M. Methods for the assessment of small-bowel and colonic transit. Semin Nucl Med. 2012;42:113–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Young AC. A new method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers. Gut. 1969;10:842–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:40–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burton DD, Camilleri M, Mullan BP, Forstrom LA, Hung JC. Colonic transit scintigraphy labeled activated charcoal compared with ion exchange pellets. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1807–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saad RJ, Hasler WL. A technical review and clinical assessment of the wireless motility capsule. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011;7:795–804.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee YY, Erdogan A, Rao SS. How to assess regional and whole gut transit time with wireless motility capsule. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;20:265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang YT, Mohammed SD, Farmer AD, et al. Regional gastrointestinal transit and pH studied in 215 healthy volunteers using the wireless motility capsule: influence of age, gender, study country and testing protocol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:761–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cassilly D, Kantor S, Knight LC, et al. Gastric emptying of a non-digestible solid: assessment with simultaneous SmartPill pH and pressure capsule, antroduodenal manometry, gastric emptying scintigraphy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:311–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kloetzer L, Chey WD, McCallum RW, et al. Motility of the antroduodenum in healthy and gastroparetics characterized by wireless motility capsule. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:527–33. e117.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Willis HJ, Thomas W, Willis DJ, Slavin JL. Feasibility of measuring gastric emptying time, with a wireless motility device, after subjects consume fiber-matched liquid and solid breakfasts. Appetite. 2011;57:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo B, McCallum RW, Koch KL, et al. Comparison of gastric emptying of a nondigestible capsule to a radio-labelled meal in healthy and gastroparetic subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:186–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maqbool S, Parkman HP, Friedenberg FK. Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill GI monitoring system with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Green AD, Belkind-Gerson J, Surjanhata BC, Mousa H, Kuo B, Di Lorenzo C. Wireless motility capsule test in children with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. J Pediatr. 2013;162:1181–7. This is the first reported study demonstrating safety and efficacy in a pediatric population.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarosiek I, Selover KH, Katz LA, et al. The assessment of regional gut transit times in healthy controls and patients with gastroparesis using wireless motility technology. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:313–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao SS, Kuo B, McCallum RW, et al. Investigation of colonic and whole Gut transit with wireless motility capsule and radioopaque markers in constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(5):537–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Camilleri M, Thorne NK, Ringel Y, et al. Wireless pH-motility capsule for colonic transit: prospective comparison with radiopaque markers in chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:874–82. e233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao SS, Coss-Adame E, Valestin J, Mysore K. Evaluation of constipation in older adults: radioopaque markers (ROMs) versus wireless motility capsule (WMC). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55:289–94. This is the first study to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the WMC in an elderly population.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikolajczyk AE, Watson S, Surma BL, Rubin DT. Assessment of tandem measurements of pH and total Gut transit time in healthy volunteers. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6:e100. This study demonstrates similar reproducibility with small bowel an colonic transit time as measured by the WMC as compared to traditional transit testing including lactulose breath testing and scintigraphy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. La Brooy SJ, Male PJ, Beavis AK, Misiewicz JJ. Assessment of the reproducibility of the lactulose H2 breath test as a measure of mouth to caecum transit time. Gut. 1983;24:893–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cremonini F, Mullan BP, Camilleri M, Burton DD, Rank MR. Performance characteristics of scintigraphic transit measurements for studies of experimental therapies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:1781–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao SS, Camilleri M, Hasler WL, et al. Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the american and european neurogastroenterology and motility societies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:8–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stein E, Clarke JO, Hutfless S, et al. 2013.

  30. Williams 3rd RE, Bauman WA, Spungen AM, et al. SmartPill technology provides safe and effective assessment of gastrointestinal function in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:81–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gelfond D, Ma C, Semler J, Borowitz D. Intestinal pH and gastrointestinal transit profiles in cystic fibrosis patients measured by wireless motility capsule. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2275–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rauch S, Krueger K, Turan A, You J, Roewer N, Sessler DI. Use of wireless motility capsule to determine gastric emptying and small intestinal transit times in critically ill trauma patients. J Crit Care. 2012;27:534 e7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hasler WL, Saad RJ, Rao SS, et al. Heightened colon motor activity measured by a wireless capsule in patients with constipation: relation to colon transit and IBS. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G1107–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hasler WL. The use of SmartPill for gastric monitoring. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;8:587–600. This is a comprehensive review on the current and future use of the WMC in the evaluation and management of gastroparesis and other antroduodenal motility disorders.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuo B, Maneerattanaporn M, Lee AA, et al. Generalized transit delay on wireless motility capsule testing in patients with clinical suspicion of gastroparesis, small intestinal dysmotility, or slow transit constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(10):2928–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rao SS, Mysore K, Attaluri A, Valestin J. Diagnostic utility of wireless motility capsule in gastrointestinal dysmotility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;5(4):249–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arora Z, Parungao JM, Lopez R, Heinlein C, Santisi J, Birgisson S. Clinical utility of wireless motility capsule in patients with suspected multiregional gastrointestinal dysmotility. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1350–7. This is the largest study to demonstrate the diagnostic value of the WMC in case of multiregional GI dysmotility syndromes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Saad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Richard J. Saad declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

With regard to the author’s research cited in this paper, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In addition, all applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurogastroenterology and Motility Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saad, R.J. The Wireless Motility Capsule: a One-Stop Shop for the Evaluation of GI Motility Disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 18, 14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-016-0489-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-016-0489-x

Keywords

Navigation