Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Lipid-Lowering Medications and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes

  • Macrovascular Complications in Diabetes (VR Aroda and A Getaneh, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

To summarize available evidence regarding lipid-lowering interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.

Recent Findings

Statins and non-statin therapies that act through upregulation of LDL receptor expression are associated with similar cardiovascular risk reduction per decrease in LDL cholesterol.

Summary

In subjects with diabetes, with or without established cardiovascular disease, each 39 mg/dl reduction in LDL cholesterol observed with statins is associated with a 21% relative reduction in the risk of major coronary events at 5 years. Statins remain the first-line lipid-lowering agents for the management of dyslipidemia in individuals with diabetes; however, the addition of non-statin therapies to lower LDL cholesterol, such as ezetimibe and PCSK-9 inhibitors, to maximally tolerated statin therapy is recommended in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and baseline LDL cholesterol over 70 mg/dl. Recent data support even lower LDL cholesterol targets (< 55 mg/dl) to further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events especially in subjects with diabetes and documented cardiovascular disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th Edn, 2017. http://diabetesatlas.org/resources/2017-atlas.html. Accessed September 17, 2018.

  2. Kannel WB. Lipids, diabetes, and coronary heart disease: insights from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1985;110:1100–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donahoe SM, Stewart GC, McCabe CH, Mohanavelu S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP, et al. Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2007;298:765–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hermans MP, Valensi P, Ahn SA, Rousseau MF. [HDL-C/apoA-I]: a multivessel cardiometabolic risk marker in women with T2DM. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34.

  5. Maddaloni E, Pozzilli P. SMART diabetes: the way to go (safe and multifactorial approach to reduce the risk for therapy in diabetes). Endocrine. 2014;46:3–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HAW, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Matthews DR, et al. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ. 1998;316:823–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. American Diabetes Association. 9. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:S86–S104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goff DC, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Catapano AL, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2008;371:117–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stone NJ, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2889–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. 2017 Focused update of the 2016 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the role of non-Statin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1785–822 This document provides a focused update to help guide clinicians on decision making regarding the use of non-statin therapies in patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with or without comorbidities.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, Bloomgarden ZT, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of endocrinology guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:1–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy AG, MacLean CD, Littenberg B, Ades PA, Pinckney RG. The challenge of achieving national cholesterol goals in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1029–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. • Silverman MG, et al. Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1289–97. This study demonstrated that the use of statin and nonstatin therapies that act via upregulation of LDL receptor expression to reduce LDL-C are associated with similar risk reductions of major major vascular events per change in LDL-cholesterol.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dattilo AM, Kris-Etherton PM. Effects of weight reduction on blood lipids and lipoproteins: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:320–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Puzziferri N, Roshek TB III, Mayo HG, Gallagher R, Belle SH, Livingston EH. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312:934–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Huffman KM, Hawk VH, Henes ST, Ocampo CI, Orenduff MC, Slentz CA, et al. Exercise effects on lipids in persons with varying dietary patterns-does diet matter if they exercise? Responses in studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise I. Am Heart J. 2012;164:117–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Estruch R, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med. 2018;e34:378.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, W Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the collaborative atorvastatin diabetes study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2004;364:685–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Collins R, et al. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2003;361:2005–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial - lipid lowering arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomi. Drugs. 2004;64:43–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Knopp RH, D’Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJ. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the atorvastatin study for prevention of coronary heart disease endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN). Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1478–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Vries FM, Kolthof J, Postma MJ, Denig P, Hak E. Efficacy of standard and intensive statin treatment for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in diabetes patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sattar N, et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375:735–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1984;251:351–64.

  27. Pre-entry characteristics of participants in the Lipid Research Clinics’ Coronary Primary Prevention Trial. J Chronic Dis. 1983;36:467–79.

  28. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial. Results of 6 years of post-trial follow-up. The Lipid Research Clinics Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1399–410.

  29. AIM-HIGH Investigators, et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2255–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group, et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:203–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sudhop T, et al. Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe in humans. Circulation. 2002;106:1943 LP–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kosoglou T, Guillaume M, Sun S, Pember LJC, Reyderman L, Statkevich P, et al. Pharmacodynamic interaction between fenofibrate and the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe. Atherosclerosis. 2001;2:38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Phan BAP, Dayspring TD, Toth PP. Ezetimibe therapy: mechanism of action and clinical update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:415–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsunoda T, Nozue T, Yamada M, Mizuguchi I, Sasaki M, Michishita I. Effects of ezetimibe on atherogenic lipoproteins and glucose metabolism in patients with diabetes and glucose intolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;100:46–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ballantyne CM, Blazing MA, King TR, Brady WE, Palmisano J. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin compared with atorvastatin in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1487–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guyton JR, Goldberg RB, Mazzone T, Weinstock RS, Polis A, Rosenberg E, et al. Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein ratios in the VYTAL trial of ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Lipidol. 2008;2:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Uemura Y, Watarai M, Ishii H, Koyasu M, Takemoto K, Yoshikawa D, et al. Atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10mg compared with atorvastatin 20 mg: impact on the lipid profile in Japanese patients with abnormal glucose tolerance and coronary artery disease. J Cardiol. 2012;59:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsujita K, Sugiyama S, Sumida H, Shimomura H, Yamashita T, Yamanaga K, et al. Impact of dual lipid-lowering strategy with ezetimibe and atorvastatin on coronary plaque regression in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: The multicenter randomized controlled PRECISE-IVUS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2387–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Nicolau JC, Corbalán R, Špinar J, et al. Benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in patients with vs. without diabetes: results from IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). Circulation. 2018;137(15):1571–82. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Morrone D, Weintraub WS, Toth PP, Hanson ME, Lowe RS, Lin J, et al. Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe plus statin and statin monotherapy and identification of factors associated with treatment response: a pooled analysis of over 21,000 subjects from 27 clinical trials. Atherosclerosis. 2012;223:251–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Staels B, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K, Leitersdorf E, Fruchart JC. Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Circulation. 1998;98:2088–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Field T. Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1849–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Koskinen P, Manttari M, Manninen V, Huttunen JK, Heinonen OP, Frick MH. Coronary heart disease incidence in NIDDM patients in the Helsinki Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:820–5. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.15.7.820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D. The veterans affairs high-density lipoprotein intervention trial: baseline characteristics of normocholesterolemic men with coronary artery disease and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:572–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Elam M, Lovato L, Ginsberg H. The ACCORD-lipid study: implications for treatment of dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;6:9–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Seidah NG, Awan Z, Chrétien M, Mbikay M. PCSK9: a key modulator of cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2014;114:1022–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Everett BM, Smith RJ, Hiatt WR. Reducing LDL with PCSK9 inhibitors--the clinical benefit of lipid drugs. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1588–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Giugliano RP, Pedersen TR, Park JG, de Ferrari GM, Gaciong ZA, Ceska R, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of achieving very low LDL-cholesterol concentrations with the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab: a prespecified secondary analysis of the FOURIER trial. Lancet (London, England). 2017;390:1962–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Giugliano RP, Keech A, Murphy SA, Huber K, Tokgozoglu SL, Lewis BS, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of evolocumab in high-risk patients receiving a statin: secondary analysis of patients with low LDL cholesterol levels and in those already receiving a maximal-potency statin in a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:1385–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Sabatine MS, Leiter LA, Wiviott SD, Giugliano RP, Deedwania P, de Ferrari GM, et al. Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:941–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Leiter LA, Cariou B, Müller-Wieland D, Colhoun HM, del Prato S, Tinahones FJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in insulin-treated individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk: the ODYSSEY DM-INSULIN randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1781–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilaria Cavallari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Ilaria Cavallari, Alessia Delli Veneri, Rosetta Melfi, Nicola Napoli, and Germano Di Sciascio declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ernesto Maddaloni has received speaker fees from Merck-Serono and grant support from scientific societies through AstraZeneca and Lilly.

Giuseppe Patti is a speaker/consultant/advisory board member for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS-Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Malesci, MSD, PIAM, Sanofi, and Sigma-Tau.

Paolo Pozzilli received research funds and consulting fees from Sanofi, Lilly, and Medtronic, AstraZeneca.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Macrovascular Complications in Diabetes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavallari, I., Delli Veneri, A., Maddaloni, E. et al. Comparison of Lipid-Lowering Medications and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 18, 138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1117-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1117-y

Keywords

Navigation