Abstract
eHealth interventions have been increasingly used to provide social support for self-management of type 2 diabetes. In this review, we discuss social support interventions, types of support provided, sources or providers of support, outcomes of the support interventions (clinical, behavioral, psychosocial), and logistical and clinical considerations for support interventions using eHealth technologies. Many types of eHealth interventions demonstrated improvements in self-management behaviors, psychosocial outcomes, and clinical measures, particularly HbA1c. Important factors to consider in clinical application of eHealth support interventions include participant preferences, usability of eHealth technology, and availability of personnel to orient or assist participants. Overall, eHealth is a promising adjunct to clinical care as it addresses the need for ongoing support in chronic disease management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Shumaker SA, Brownell A. Toward a theory of social support: closing conceptual gaps. J Soc Issues. 1984;40(4):11–36.
Powers MA et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(8):1323–34.
Boogerd EA et al. “What is eHealth”: time for an update? JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(1):e29.
Bond GE et al. The effects of a web-based intervention on psychosocial well-being among adults aged 60 and older with diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(3):446–56.
Carter EL, Nunlee-Bland G, Callender C. A patient-centric, provider-assisted diabetes telehealth self-management intervention for urban minorities. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8:1b.
Nes AA et al. The development and feasibility of a web-based intervention with diaries and situational feedback via smartphone to support self-management in patients with diabetes type 2. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97(3):385–93.
Trief PM et al. Adherence to diabetes self care for white, African-American and Hispanic American telemedicine participants: 5 year results from the IDEATel project. Ethn Health. 2013;18(1):83–96.
Chen L et al. Evaluating self-management behaviors of diabetic patients in a telehealthcare program: longitudinal study over 18 months. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e266. This study evaluates the impact of a telehealth intervention on self-management as well as HbA1c. Participant use of the various support aspects of the intervention are reported, which enhances its generalizability and translation.
Lyles CR et al. Qualitative evaluation of a mobile phone and web-based collaborative care intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(5):563–9.
McMahon GT et al. A randomized comparison of online- and telephone-based care management with internet training alone in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(11):1060–7.
Nagrebetsky A et al. Stepwise self-titration of oral glucose-lowering medication using a mobile telephone-based telehealth platform in type 2 diabetes: a feasibility trial in primary care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):123–34. This clinical study demonstrates that a mobile health platform can be utilized to titrate or intensify oral glucose lowering medications between clinic visits. Although prior studies had demonstrated this for insulin therapy, this is relevant to addressing clinical inertia in intensification of oral agents.
Stone RA et al. Active care management supported by home telemonitoring in veterans with type 2 diabetes: the DiaTel randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):478–84.
Wayne N, Ritvo P. Smartphone-enabled health coach intervention for people with diabetes from a modest socioeconomic strata community: single-arm longitudinal feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e149. 1p.
Chan JCN et al. Effects of telephone-based peer support in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving integrated care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(6):972–81. 10p.
De Greef KP et al. The effects of a pedometer-based behavioral modification program with telephone support on physical activity and sedentary behavior in type 2 diabetes patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):275–9.
Heisler M et al. Comparison of community health worker-led diabetes medication decision-making support for low-income Latino and African American adults with diabetes using e-health tools versus print materials: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(10 Suppl):S13–22.
Ruggiero L et al. Medical assistant coaching to support diabetes self-care among low-income racial/ethnic minority populations: randomized controlled trial. West J Nurs Res. 2014;36(9):1052–73. Findings from this study indicate that medical assistants, when educated on participant-centered care techniques and behavioral counseling strategies, provide effective self-management support. Additionally, the findings indicated the benefit was enhanced when supporters were of the same race/ethnicity and community as the participants.
Varney JE et al. Effect of hospital-based telephone coaching on glycaemic control and adherence to management guidelines in type 2 diabetes, a randomised controlled trial. Intern Med J. 2014;44(9):890–7. 8p.
Wu L, Forbes A, While A. Patients’ experience of a telephone booster intervention to support weight management in type 2 diabetes and its acceptability. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(4):221–3.
Lawler SP et al. Moderators of health behavior initiation and maintenance in a randomized telephone counseling trial. Prev Med. 2014;61:34–41. 8p.
Plotnikoff RC et al. Peer telephone counseling for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case-study approach to inform the design, development, and evaluation of programs targeting physical activity. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(5):717–29.
Aikens JE et al. Diabetes self-management support using mHealth and enhanced informal caregiving. J Diabetes Complicat. 2014;28(2):171–6.
Williams ED et al. Randomised controlled trial of an automated, interactive telephone intervention (TLC Diabetes) to improve type 2 diabetes management: baseline findings and six-month outcomes. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:602.
Lorig K et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275–81.
Nobis S et al. Efficacy of a web-based intervention with mobile phone support in treating depressive symptoms in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(5):776–83.
Sherifali D et al. Evaluating the feasibility and impact of an internet-based lifestyle management program in a diabetes care setting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(6):358–62.
Pacaud D et al. Successful delivery of diabetes self-care education and follow-up through eHealth media. Can J Diabetes. 2012;36(5):257–62.
Ryan JG et al. Feasibility of an internet-based intervention for improving diabetes outcomes among low-income patients with a high risk for poor diabetes outcomes followed in a community clinic. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39(3):365–75.
Johnson C et al. Feasibility and preliminary effects of a virtual environment for adults with type 2 diabetes: pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(2):e23.
Jennings CA et al. Effectiveness of a web-based physical activity intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes—a randomised controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014;60:33–40.
Richardson CR et al. An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(4):e71.
Glasgow RE et al. Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1315–22.
Glasgow RE et al. Twelve-month outcomes of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(1):81–92.
Heisler M et al. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(8):507–15.
Nundy S et al. How do mobile phone diabetes programs drive behavior change?: evidence from a mixed methods observational cohort study. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(6):806–19. 14p.
Glasgow RE et al. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e9.
Jernigan V, Lorig K. The internet diabetes self-management workshop for American Indians and Alaska natives. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(2):261–70.
Weaver RR et al. Health capabilities and diabetes self-management: the impact of economic, social, and cultural resources. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:58–68.
Mak M et al. Adult attachment, perceived support, and depressive symptoms in Chinese and American cultures. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2010;29(2):144–65.
Shaya FT et al. Effect of social networks intervention in type 2 diabetes: a partial randomised study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(4):326–32.
Fisher EB et al. Peer support for self-management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(1):130–9.
Heaney C, Israel B. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
House J. Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1981.
Langford CP, Bowsher J, Maloney JP, Lillis PP. Social support: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(1):95–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The authors can attest that for the one study reviewed that was performed by two authors (Johnson, et al., 2014): All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Psychosocial Aspects
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vorderstrasse, A., Lewinski, A., Melkus, G.D. et al. Social Support for Diabetes Self-Management via eHealth Interventions. Curr Diab Rep 16, 56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-016-0756-0
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-016-0756-0