Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computed Tomography–Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Practical Guide

  • Pericardial Disease (AL Klein and CL Jellis, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this article is to serve as a practical guide to computed tomography (CT)–guided pericardiocentesis and to discuss the role of this approach in current clinical practice. An overview of indications, technique, advantages, and limitations specific to CT-guided pericardiocentesis will be provided. The reader will have an enhanced understanding of the use of this imaging modality to guide pericardial drainage.

Recent Findings

Use of CT guidance to drain the pericardial space is safe, especially when adequate echocardiographic evaluation is precluded and when echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis is deemed unsafe and or not feasible.

Summary

Our review and experience indicate that CT-guided pericardiocentesis is technically successful in more than 94% of patients, with a low risk (<1%) of significant complications. CT-guided pericardiocentesis is therefore a viable alternative when echocardiographic guidance is insufficient and can obviate the need for surgery in most patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Levene G, Kaufman SA. The roentgen diagnosis of pericardial effusion, with special reference to the appearance of the barium-filled esophagus and the cardiohepatic angle. Radiology. 1951;57(3):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1148/57.3.373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Imazio M, Adler Y. Management of pericardial effusion. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(16):1186–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Callahan JA, Seward JB, Nishimura RA, Miller FA Jr, Reeder GS, Shub C, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis: experience in 117 consecutive patients. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55(4):476–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(85)90397-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang TS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, Barnes ME, Sinak LJ, Gersh BJ, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):429–36. https://doi.org/10.4065/77.5.429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Osman A, Wan Chuan T, Ab Rahman J, Via G, Tavazzi G. Ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis: a novel parasternal approach. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018;25(5):322–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandraratna PA, Reid CL, Nimalasuriya A, Kawanishi D, Rahimtoola SH. Application of 2-dimensional contrast studies during pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52(8):1120–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(83)90544-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karuppasamy K. Real-time image-guided pericardial drain placement. American College of Cardiology website. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2017/07/12/07/04/Real-Time-Image-Guided-Pericardial-Drain-Placement. Published July 12, 2017. Accessed 3 Aug 2023.

  8. Uppot RN. Technical challenges of imaging & image-guided interventions in obese patients. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1089):20170931. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim AO, Jaber F, Alghizzawi M, Metzinger M, Asif T. CT-guided pericardiocentesis in a case of tension pneumopericardium and tamponade secondary to an enteropericardial fistula. J Am Coll Cardiol Case Rep. 2023;18:101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101909.

  10. Cosyns B, Plein S, Nihoyanopoulos P, Smiseth O, Achenbach S, Andrade MJ, et al. European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) position paper: multimodality imaging in pericardial disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):12–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer SL, Kelly PD, Schenkel FA, Barr ML. CT-guided tube pericardiostomy: a safe and effective technique in the management of postsurgical pericardial effusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):W314–20. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hongo T, Sugiyama H, Naito H, Nakao A. Successful computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis after performing a failed conventional transthoracic echocardiography-guided approach: a case report. J Emerg Med Case Rep. 2020;11(2):39–42. https://doi.org/10.33706/jemcr.632857.

  13. Sheafor DH, Paulson EK, Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, Nelson RC. Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(4):939–42. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.4.1740939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallagher S, Syed F, Gurajala R, Gill A, Levitin A, Karuppasamy K. Real-time image-guided drainage of postsurgical pericardial effusion is an effective alternative to surgical window. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(5):S153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein SV, Afridi H, Agarwal D, Coughlin BF, Schielke LH. CT directed diagnostic and therapeutic pericardiocentesis: 8-year experience at a single institution. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11(6):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0389-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. David S, Mansoubi H, Hoey E, Agrawal B, Tasker A. CT guided pericardiocentesis: a UK experience. ECR 2010. Poster No. C-0494. https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2010/C-0494.

  17. Tomoda H, Hoshiai M, Furuya H, Oeda Y, Matsumoto S, Tanabe T, et al. Evaluation of pericardial effusion with computed tomography. Am Heart J. 1980;99(6):701–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(80)90618-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandring KH, Müller C. CT-gestützte perkutane Punktion und Drainage von Perikardergüssen [CT-guided percutaneous puncture and drainage of pericardial effusion]. Radiol Diagn (Berl). 1989;30(6):643–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ceviz M, Çolak A, Becit N, Kaya U, Ogul H. Computed tomography-guided drainage of pericardial effusion. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;22(3):553–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neves D, Silva G, Morais G, Ferreira N, Carvalho M, Gama Ribeiro V, et al. Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis - a single-center experience [erratum in Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35(6):392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2016.05.001]. Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35(5):285–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2015.11.015.

  21. Duvernoy O, Magnusson A. CT-guided pericardiocentesis. Acta Radiol. 1996;37(5):775–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851960373P269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tam A, Ensor JE, Snyder H, Gupta S, Durand JB, Wallace MJ. Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32(6):1217–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eichler K, Zangos S, Thalhammer A, Jacobi V, Walcher F, Marzi I, et al. CT-guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns and clinical outcome. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(1):28–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Syed F, Slaughter R, Tjahjadi C, Hansen M, Raffel O. Computed tomography guided pericardiocentesis in adults: a single centre experience of 44 procedures. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20(suppl 2):S165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2011.05.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nour-Eldin NA, Alsubhi M, Gruber-Rouh T, Vogl TJ, Kaltenbach B, Soliman HH, et al. CT-guided drainage of pericardial effusion after open cardiac surgery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(8):1223–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1624-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. •• Ingber RB, Lodhi U, Mootz J, Siegel A, Al-Roubaie M, Greben C. Comparing outcomes of CT-guided percutaneous pericardial drainage with surgical pericardial window in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusions. Acad Radiol. 2023 Mar 14:S1076–6332(23)00087–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.02.014. Findings from this study suggest that complications from CT-guided percutaneous pericardial drainage are significantly lower compared to subxiphoid surgical pericardial window.

  27. Bruning R, Muehlstaedt M, Becker C, Knez A, Haberl R, Reiser M. Computed tomography-fluoroscopy guided drainage of pericardial effusions: experience in 11 cases. Invest Radiol. 2002;37(6):328–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200206000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Khashper A, Shelef I, Taragin BH, Smolikov A. Therapeutic computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: lessons learned based on a 7-year single-center experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;45(4):643–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001190. Findings from this study suggest that CT-guided pericardiocentesis is safe and effective in managing patients requiring therapeutic pericardial drainages.

  29. Vilela EM, Ruivo C, Guerreiro CE, Silva MP, Ladeiras-Lopes R, Caeiro D, et al. Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: a systematic review concerning contemporary evidence and future perspectives. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;12(11):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944718792413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaalan AM, Ezeldin TH, Elwakeel EE, Salem EF. Predictors of cardiac injury during pericardiocentesis. Egypt J Surg. 2022;41(3):1009–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_150_22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luis SA, Sinak LJ, Michelena HI, Kane GC. American College of Cardiology website. ACC.org. Imaging-guided pericardiocentesis: a comparison of echocardiographic versus computed tomography guided approaches. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2020/10/13/12/36/imaging-guided-pericardiocentesis. Published October 13, 2020. Accessed 3 Aug 2023.

  32. Committee Opinion No. 723: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation [erratum in Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):786. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002858]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e210–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355.

  33. Cheon BK, Kim CL, Kim KR, Kang MH, Lim JA, Woo NS, et al. Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management. Korean J Pain. 2018;31(4):244–52. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Megan Griffiths for her assistance in editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic 9500 Euclid Avenue, L10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Kunaal R. Bafna, Anouva Kalra-Lall, Ram Kishore Gurajala & Karunakaravel Karuppasamy

Authors
  1. Kunaal R. Bafna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anouva Kalra-Lall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ram Kishore Gurajala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karunakaravel Karuppasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karunakaravel Karuppasamy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bafna, K.R., Kalra-Lall, A., Gurajala, R.K. et al. Computed Tomography–Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Practical Guide. Curr Cardiol Rep 25, 1433–1441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-01965-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-01965-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation