Skip to main content
Log in

Pulsed Field Ablation: a Novel Therapeutic Tool for Catheter-Based Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

  • New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease (AA Bavry and M Massoomi, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

With catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation becoming increasingly common, the field of electrophysiology is searching for tools to improve procedural efficacy and safety. This review focuses on a novel ablation tool, pulsed field ablation, which promises to push the needle forward. Pulsed field ablation uses high-frequency electrical pulses to ablate cardiac tissue.

Recent Findings

A number of pre-clinical and clinical studies have shown pulsed field ablation offers an efficient means of ablating cardiac tissue with minimal risk of collateral injury.

Summary

Pulsed field ablation provides a non-thermal means of cardiac tissue ablation with minimal risk of injury to adjacent structures. Future studies will define the optimal current delivery, number of lesions needed to achieve the desired tissue effect, and how best to integrate pulsed field ablation catheters into 3-dimensional mapping systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1261–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:417–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, Bennett M, Essebag V, Champagne J, et al. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:305–15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Callans DJ, Gerstenfeld EP, Dixit S, Zado E, Vanderhoff M, Ren JF, et al. Efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures in patient with recurrent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15:1050–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j1540-8167.2004.04052.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nery PB, Belliveau D, Nair GM, Bernick J, Redpath C, Szczotka A, et al. Relationship between pulmonary vein reconnection and atrial arrhythmia recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2016;2:474–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, Sondhi M, Xu Y, Martin A, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009;2(4):349–361. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.108.824789

  8. Turagam MK, Musikantow D, Whang W, Koruth JS, Miller MA, Langan MN, et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(6):697–705. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. • Verma A, Asirvatham S, Deneke, T, Castellvi Q, Neal RE. Primer on pulsed field ablation: understanding the benefits and limitations. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2021;14:902–917. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010086This review provides an excellent overview of pulsed field ablation including the biophysics and various ablation catheter designs.

  10. Rubinsky L, Guenther E, Mikus P, Stehling M, Rubinsky B. Electrolytic effects during tissue ablation by electroporation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016;15:NP95–NP103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533034615601549

  11. Xie F, Varghese F, Pakhomov AG, Semenov I, Xiao S, Philpott J, et al. Ablation of myocardial tissue with nanosecond pulsed electric fields. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0144833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33(2):223–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8981-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley CJ, Haines DE. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31:2136–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deodhar A, Dickfeld T, Single GW, Hamilton WC, Thornton RH, Sofocleous CT, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):W330–5. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wittkampf FH, Van Driel VJ, Van Wessel H, Wink A, Hof IE, Grundeman PF, et al. Feasibility of electroporation for the creation of pulmonary vein ostial lesions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(3):302–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01863.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy VY, Anter E, Rackauskas G, Peichl P, Koruth JS, Petru J, et al. Lattice-tip focal ablation catheter that toggles between radiofrequency and pulsed field energy to treat atrial fibrillation: a first-in-human trial. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2020;13:e008718. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008718

  17. Anic A. Safety and feasibility of pulsed field ablation with the centauri system for patients with atrial fibrillation. EP Europace. 2021;23:ii9–ii13.

  18. Wittkampf FHM, van Es R, Neven K. Electroporation and its relevance for cardiac catheter ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:977–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reddy VY, Koruth J, Jais P, Petru J, Timko F, Skalsky I, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with pulsed electric fields: an ultra-rapid, tissue selective modality for cardiac ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:987–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Verma A, Boersma L, Hummel J, Calkins H, Sanders P, Haines DE, et al. PULSED AF: First human experience and acute procedural outcomes using a novel pulsed field ablation system. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2022;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010168

  21. Koruth J, Kuroki K, Kawamura I, Brose R, Viswanathan R, Buck E, et al. Pulsed field ablation vs radiofrequency ablation: esophageal injury in a novel porcine model. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2020;13:e008303. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008303.

  22. Stewart MT, Haines DE, Verma A, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Grassl E, et al. Intracardiac pulsed field ablation: proof of feasibility in a chronic porcine model. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:754–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neven K, van Driel V, van Wessel H, van Es R, Doevendans PA, Wittkampf F. Myocardial lesion size after epicardial electroporation catheter ablation after subxiphoid puncture. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2014;7(4):728–733. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001659

  24. Wittkampf FHM, van Driel VJ, avn Wessel H, Neven KGEJ, Grundeman PF, Vink A, et al. Myocardial lesion depth with circular electroporation ablation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2012;5:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.970079

  25. Nakatani Y, Sridi-Cheniti S, Cheniti G, Ramirez FD, Goujeau C, Andre C, et al. Pulsed field ablation prevents chronic atrial fibrotic changes and restrictive mechanics after catheter ablation. EP Europace. 2021;23(11):1767–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pappone C, Oral H, Santinelli V, Vicedomini G, Lang CC, Manguso F, et al. Atrio-esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004;109(22):2724–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000131866.44650.46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahmed H, Neuzil P, d’Avila A, Cha YM, Laragy M, Mares K, et al. The esophageal effects of cryoenergy during cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(7):962–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.03.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hong J, Stewart MT, Cheek DS, Francischelli DE, Kirchof N. Cardiac ablation via electroporation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;3381–3384. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332816

  29. Sacher F, Monahan KH, Thomas SP, Davidson N, Adragao P, Sanders P, et al. Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2498–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuck KH, Furnkranz A. Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(12):1427–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01944.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tokuda M, Yamashita S, Sato H, Oseto H, Ikewaki H, Yokoyama M, et al. Long-term course of phrenic nerve injury after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Scientific Reports. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85618-3

  32. Andrade JG, Dubuc M, Ferreira J, Guerra PG, Landry E, Coulombe N, et al. Histopathology of cryoballoon ablation-induced phrenic nerve injury. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;25(2):187–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Driel VJHM, Neven K, van Wessel H, Vink A, Doevendans PAFM, Wittkampf FDM. Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(8):1838–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Holmes DR, Monahan KH, Packer D. Pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical spectrum and interventional considerations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(4):267–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcin.2008.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Driel VJ, Neven KG, van Wessel H, du Pre BC, Wink A, Doevendans PAFM, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation: electroporation versus radiofrequency. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2014;7(4):734–738. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001111

  36. Howard B, Haines D, Verma A, Packer D, Kirchhof N, Barka N, et al. Reduction in pulmonary vein stenosis and collateral damage with pulsed field ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation in a canine model. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2020;13:e008337. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008337

  37. Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Koruth JS, Petru J, Funosako M, Cochet H, et al. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(3):315–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. •• Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Anic A, Petru J, Funasako M, et al. Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7:614–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.014. This recent publication reported results of 3 trials using pulsed field ablation in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Loh P, van Es R, Groen MHA, Neven K, Kassenberg W, Wittkampf FHM, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation with single pulse irreversible electroporation: a first in human study in 10 patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2020;13:e008192. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008192

  40. Reddy VY, Anic A, Koruth J, Petru J, Funasako M, Minami K, et al. Pulsed field ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1068–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gunawardene MA, Schaeffer BN, Jularic M, Eickholt C, Maurer T, Akbulak RO, et al. Pulsed field ablation combined wtih ultrahigh-density mapping in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: practical and electrophysiological considerations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15349

  42. Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, Deneke T, Michaud G. Esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula caused by ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2017;136:1247–55. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.025827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew E. Darby.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darby, A.E. Pulsed Field Ablation: a Novel Therapeutic Tool for Catheter-Based Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Curr Cardiol Rep 24, 793–799 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01697-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01697-2

Keywords

Navigation