Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent Advances in T1 and T2 Mapping in the Assessment of Fulminant Myocarditis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

  • Cardio-Oncology (SA Francis and RB Morgan, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review was undertaken to summarise recent data relating to T1 and T2 relaxation times in the assessment of myocarditis using cardiac MRI, and the effect new studies have had on the established diagnostic criteria, leading to recently proposed revised criteria for the cardiac MRI assessment of myocarditis.

Recent Findings

In 2018, updates to the 2009 Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) were proposed, based on studies showing improved accuracy of T1 mapping techniques over T1 signal intensity ratio-based imaging, although for the detection of myocardial oedema either T2-weighted images or increased T2 relaxation times can be used. Non-ischaemic distribution of scar on late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) T1-weighted imaging remains in the newly revised criteria, which, although can have low sensitivity due to fibrosis presenting diffusely or due to CMR being performed early in the disease process before scar formation, remains in the LLC due to its high specificity. Early gadolinium enhancement has been removed from the LLC, as T1 quantification has higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of myocardial injury.

Summary

In the CMR assessment of myocarditis, T1 and T2 quantifications are now recommended over T1- and T2-weighted imaging. Late gadolinium enhancement in a non-ischaemic pattern remains in the updated criteria, whereas early gadolinium enhancement has been superseded by T1 quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, Alakija P, Cooper LT, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(17):1475–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno-Blanes J, Felix SB, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(33):2636–48, 48a-48d.

  3. Liu PP, Mason JW. Advances in the understanding of myocarditis. Circulation. 2001;104(9):1076–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caforio AL, Marcolongo R, Basso C, Iliceto S. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of myocarditis. Heart. 2015;101(16):1332–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bock CT, Klingel K, Kandolf R. Human parvovirus B19-associated myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1248–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock CT, Duchting A, Utta F, Brunner E, Sy BT, Klingel K, et al. Molecular phenotypes of human parvovirus B19 in patients with myocarditis. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(4):183–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmood SS, Fradley MG, Cohen JV, Nohria A, Reynolds KL, Heinzerling LM, et al. Myocarditis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(16):1755–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, Chalkias S, Gorham J, Xu Y, et al. Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1749–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutberlet M, Spors B, Thoma T, Bertram H, Denecke T, Felix R, et al. Suspected chronic myocarditis at cardiac MR: diagnostic accuracy and association with immunohistologically detected inflammation and viral persistence. Radiology. 2008;246(2):401–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stiermaier T, Fohrenbach F, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Boudriot E, Sandri M, et al. Biventricular endomyocardial biopsy in patients with suspected myocarditis: feasibility, complication rate and additional diagnostic value. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:364–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotanidis CP, Bazmpani MA, Haidich AB, Karvounis C, Antoniades C, Karamitsos TD. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(11):1583–90. A comparison of diagnostic accuracy between the traditional Lake Louise Criteria, and newer CMR parametric mapping techniques.

  12. Ferreira VM, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, Kramer CM, Carbone I, Sechtem U, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(24):3158-76. Up to date recommendations on the diagnosis of myocarditis on Cardiac MRI.

  13. Piechnik SK, Ferreira VM, Dall’Armellina E, Cochlin LE, Greiser A, Neubauer S, et al. Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:69.

  14. Tseng WY, Su MY, Tseng YH. Introduction to cardiovascular magnetic resonance: technical principles and clinical applications. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016;32(2):129–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Puntmann VO, Voigt T, Chen Z, Mayr M, Karim R, Rhode K, et al. Native T1 mapping in differentiation of normal myocardium from diffuse disease in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(4):475–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karamitsos TD, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM, Fontana M, Ntusi NB, Ferreira VM, et al. Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(4):488–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E, Karamitsos TD, Francis JM, Ntusi N, et al. T(1) mapping for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis using CMR: comparison to T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhanced imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(10):1048–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sado DM, White SK, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM, Treibel T, Captur G, et al. Identification and assessment of Anderson-Fabry disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(3):392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedersen SF, Thrysoe SA, Robich MP, Paaske WP, Ringgaard S, Botker HE, et al. Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage by T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thavendiranathan P, Walls M, Giri S, Verhaert D, Rajagopalan S, Moore S, et al. Improved detection of myocardial involvement in acute inflammatory cardiomyopathies using T2 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(1):102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor AJ, Salerno M, Dharmakumar R, Jerosch-Herold M. T1 mapping: basic techniques and clinical applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(1):67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira V MD. Mapping techniques. In: Lombardi M PS, Petersen S, Bucciarelli-Ducci, Valsangiacomo Buechel E, Basso C, Ferrari V, editor. The EACVI Textbook of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Oxford University Press.

  23. Slavin GS. On the use of the “look-locker correction” for calculating T1 values from MOLLI. 17th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions; New Orleans, LA, USA: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; 2014. p. p:55.

  24. Kim PK, Hong YJ, Im DJ, Suh YJ, Park CH, Kim JY, et al. Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping: techniques and clinical applications. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(1):113–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blissett S, Chocron Y, Kovacina B, Afilalo J. Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. The most current comparison of CMR parametric mapping with traditional Lake Louise Criteria in the diagnosis of myocarditis.

  26. Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E, Karamitsos TD, Francis JM, Choudhury RP, et al. Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Payne AR, Casey M, McClure J, McGeoch R, Murphy A, Woodward R, et al. Bright-blood T2-weighted MRI has higher diagnostic accuracy than dark-blood short tau inversion recovery MRI for detection of acute myocardial infarction and for assessment of the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(3):210–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Iles LM, Taylor AJ. Is one better than two? T1 mapping in myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(10):1059–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kellman P, Wilson JR, Xue H, Ugander M, Arai AE. Extracellular volume fraction mapping in the myocardium, part 1: evaluation of an automated method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gai N, Turkbey EB, Nazarian S, van der Geest RJ, Liu CY, Lima JA, et al. T1 mapping of the gadolinium-enhanced myocardium: adjustment for factors affecting interpatient comparison. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(5):1407–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flett AS, Hayward MP, Ashworth MT, Hansen MS, Taylor AM, Elliott PM, et al. Equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the measurement of diffuse myocardial fibrosis: preliminary validation in humans. Circulation. 2010;122(2):138–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Radunski UK, Lund GK, Stehning C, Schnackenburg B, Bohnen S, Adam G, et al. CMR in patients with severe myocarditis: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers including extracellular volume imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(7):667–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Luetkens JA, Homsi R, Sprinkart AM, Doerner J, Dabir D, Kuetting DL, et al. Incremental value of quantitative CMR including parametric mapping for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(2):154–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lurz P, Luecke C, Eitel I, Fohrenbach F, Frank C, Grothoff M, et al. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis: the MyoRacer-trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(15):1800–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lota AS, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH. T2 mapping and T2* imaging in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(4):431–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baessler B, Schaarschmidt F, Dick A, Stehning C, Schnackenburg B, Michels G, et al. Mapping tissue inhomogeneity in acute myocarditis: a novel analytical approach to quantitative myocardial edema imaging by T2-mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bohnen S, Radunski UK, Lund GK, Kandolf R, Stehning C, Schnackenburg B, et al. Performance of t1 and t2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance to detect active myocarditis in patients with recent-onset heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(6).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, St James Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland

    P. Wheen, R. Armstrong & C. A. Daly

Authors
  1. P. Wheen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Armstrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. A. Daly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Wheen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

P. Wheen, R. Armstrong and C.A. Daly declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardio-Oncology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wheen, P., Armstrong, R. & Daly, C.A. Recent Advances in T1 and T2 Mapping in the Assessment of Fulminant Myocarditis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Curr Cardiol Rep 22, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01295-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01295-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation