Skip to main content
Log in

Use of a Discharge Educational Strategy Versus Standard Discharge Care on Reduction of Vascular Risk in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

  • Ischemic Heart Disease (D Mukherjee, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

The burden of ischemic stroke is disproportionally distributed between ethnic and racial subgroups in the USA, minority populations with lower socioeconomic status being at higher risk. These discrepancies are mirrored in susceptibility, primary care, and post-discharge procedures. Post-discharge strategies are of particular importance as their primary goal is to prevent recurrent stroke, which makes up about 25% of stroke cases per year in US. As disadvantaged minorities have faster growing populations, recurrent stroke poses a significant challenge not only for caretakers but also for the health care system as the whole. A number of educational strategies were employed to inform the general public of major symptoms, risk factors, and preventive measures for recurrent stroke. However, over affected subgroups did not prove responsive to such measures as these did not conform to their cultural and sociological specificities.

Recent Findings

The Discharge Educational Strategies for Reduction of Vascular Events Intervention (DESERVE) is a randomized control trial with a one year follow up, set out to investigate the possibility that culturally tailored, community-centered post-discharge strategies would improve compliance to therapy and prevention against secondary stroke. The trial targeted African Americans, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic whites, adapting discharge strategies for each individual group.

Summary

DESERVE accomplished a significant reduction in blood pressure in the Hispanic intervention group by 9.9 mm Hg compared with usual care. The remaining two groups were not susceptible to these measures. DESERVE holds promise for culturally tailored interventions in the future in a battle against stroke and other chronic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Samsa GP, Bian J, Lipscomb J, Matchar DB. Epidemiology of recurrent cerebral infarction: a medicare claims-based comparison of first and recurrent strokes on 2-year survival and cost. Stroke. 1999;30:338–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldayel AY, Alharbi MM, Shadid AM, et al. The association between race/ethnicity and the prevalence of stroke among United States adults in 2015: a secondary analysis study using Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Electron Physician. 2017;9(12):5871–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang J, Keenan NL, Ayala C, et al. Awareness of stroke warning symptoms—13 states and the District of Columbia, 2005. MMWR. 2008;57:481–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. • Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e229-e445. This statistical update provides important new data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, new metrics to assess and monitor healthy diets, a new chapter on venous disease and pulmonary hypertension (PH), new information on stroke in young adults, an enhanced focus on underserved and minority populations.

  5. Sappok T, Faulstich A, Stuckert E, et al. Compliance with secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: a prospective evaluation. Stroke. 2001;32:1884–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leoo T, Lindgren A, Petersson J, et al. Risk factors and treatment at recurrent stroke onset: results from the Recurrent Stroke Quality and Epidemiology (RESQUE) study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(3):254–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trimble B, Morgenstern LB. Stroke in minorities. Neurol Clin. 2008;26(4):1177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Day JC. Population projections of the United States by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin: 1995 to 2050. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1996. US Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, P25–1130.

  9. Bridgewood B, Lager K, Mistri A, et al. Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD009103.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sproston K, Mindell J. Health Survey for England 2004. The health of minority ethnic groups. 2006.

  11. •• Boden-Albala, Bernadette, et al. Efficacy of a discharge educational strategy vs standard discharge care on reduction of vascular risk in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: the DESERVE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology. 2019;76.1: 20–27. Findings from this study suggest the importance of culturally tailored educational and community-oriented programs in the improvement of secondary prevention in stroke-related risk factors especially in underprivileged communities.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crisp N. Race equality action plan. London: Department of Health; 2004. URL: www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crook ED, Peters M. Health disparities in chronic diseases: where the money is. Am J Med Sci. 2008;335(4):266–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao Y, Siegel PZ, White S, et al. Improving actions to control high blood pressure in Hispanic communities—racial and ethnic approaches to community health across the U.S. project, 2009–2012. Prev Med. 2016;83:11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallo LC, Fortmann AL, Mccurley JL, Isasi CR, Penedo FJ, Daviglus ML, et al. Associations of structural and functional social support with diabetes prevalence in U.S. Hispanics/Latinos: results from the HCHS/SOL sociocultural ancillary study. J Behav Med. 2015;38(1):160–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Satterfield DW, Volansky M, Caspersen CJ, et al. Community-based lifestyle interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(9):2643–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawlor ER, Bradley DT, Cupples ME, et al. The effect of community-based interventions for cardiovascular disease secondary prevention on behavioural risk factors. Prev Med. 2018;114:24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer Statistics review 1975–2010. Bethesda: National Center Institute; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murray CJ, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, et al. Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. PLoS Med. 2006;3(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McNeill LH, Coeling M, Puleo E, et al. Colorectal cancer prevention for low-income, sociodemographically-diverse adults in public housing: baseline findings of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Doorenbos AZ, Jacobsen C, Corpuz R, et al. A randomized controlled calendar mail-out to increase cancer screening among urban American Indian and Alaska Native patients. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(3):549–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duggan C, Coronado G, Martinez J, et al. Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ottenbache K, Campbell J, Kuo YF. Racial and ethnic differences in postacute rehabilitation outcomes after stroke in the United States. Stroke. 2008;39(5):1514–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anantha R. Vellipuram.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Ischemic Heart Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vellipuram, A.R., Hussain, Z., Rawla, P. et al. Use of a Discharge Educational Strategy Versus Standard Discharge Care on Reduction of Vascular Risk in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack. Curr Cardiol Rep 22, 27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01283-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01283-4

Keywords

Navigation