Skip to main content
Log in

Intravascular MRI for Plaque Characterization: Are We Close to Reality?

  • Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (SE Petersen and F Pugliese, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-invasive external magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of large vessel atherosclerosis is a robust and promising imaging modality that can be applied for the evaluation of the atherosclerotic process in large vessels. However, it requires expertise for setup and time for data acquisition and analysis. Intravascular MRI is a promising tool, but its use remains at the pre-clinical stage within selected research groups. In this review, the current status and future role of intravascular MRI for atherosclerotic plaque characterization are summarized, along with important challenges which will be necessary to overcome prior to the wide adoption of this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

3T:

3.0 Tesla Magnetic Field Strength

CT:

Computed tomography

IVMRI:

Intravascular magnetic resonance imaging

IVUS:

Intravascular coronary ultrasound

MACE:

Major cardiovascular events

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420:868–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calvert PA, Obaid DR, O’Sullivan M, et al. Association between IVUS findings and adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: the VIVA (VH-IVUS in Vulnerable Atherosclerosis) Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:894–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Niccoli G, Montone RA, Di Vito L, et al. Plaque rupture and intact fibrous cap assessed by optical coherence tomography portend different outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Balu N, Wang J, Dong L, et al. Current techniques for MR imaging of atherosclerosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;20:203–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Underhill HR, Hatsukami TS, Fayad ZA, et al. MRI of carotid atherosclerosis: clinical implications and future directions. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:165–73. Excellent review highlighting the potential clinical applications of MRI to evaluate atherosclerosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussain T, Henningsson M, Butzbach B, et al. Combined coronary lumen and vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging with i-T2prep: influence of nitroglycerin. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varma N, Hinojar R, D’Cruz D, et al. Coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement imaging as a potential direct marker of coronary involvement: integration of findings from CAD and SLE patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:762–70.

  9. Andia ME, Henningsson M, Hussain T, et al. Flow-independent 3D whole-heart vessel wall imaging using an interleaved T2-preparation acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peel SA, Hussain T, Schaeffter T, et al. Cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out: a comparison between 1.5 and 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI. 2012;35:969–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurst GC, Hua J, Duerk JL, et al. Intravascular (catheter) NMR receiver probe: preliminary design analysis and application to canine iliofemoral imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1992;24:343–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin AJ, Henkelman RM. Intravascular MR imaging in a porcine animal model. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:224–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Correia LC, Atalar E, Kelemen MD, et al. Intravascular magnetic resonance imaging of aortic atherosclerotic plaque composition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3626–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quick HH, Ladd ME, Zimmermann-Paul GG, et al. Single-loop coil concepts for intravascular magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:751–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmermann-Paul GG, Quick HH, Vogt P, et al. High-resolution intravascular magnetic resonance imaging: monitoring of plaque formation in heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 1999;99:1054–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ocali O, Atalar E. Intravascular magnetic resonance imaging using a loopless catheter antenna. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37:112–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larose E, Yeghiazarians Y, Libby P, et al. Characterization of human atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2005;112:2324–31. First in vivo study demonstrating the feasibility of studying atherosclerosis plaque components using IVMRI.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larose E, Kinlay S, Selwyn AP, et al. Improved characterization of atherosclerotic plaques by gadolinium contrast during intravascular magnetic resonance imaging of human arteries. Atherosclerosis. 2008;196:919–25. Study highlights the importance of intravenous gadolinium to facilitate the discrimination and plaque characterization evaluated in vivo by IVMRI.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneiderman J, Wilensky RL, Weiss A, et al. Diagnosis of thin-cap fibroatheromas by a self-contained intravascular magnetic resonance imaging probe in ex vivo human aortas and in situ coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1961–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sathyanarayana S, Schar M, Kraitchman DL, et al. Towards real-time intravascular endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1158–65.

  21. Qian D, Bottomley PA. High-resolution intravascular magnetic resonance quantification of atherosclerotic plaque at 3T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Achenbach S, Boehmer K, Pflederer T, et al. Influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on the computed tomographic attenuation of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, et al. OCT for the identification of vulnerable plaque in acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:198–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Larose.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

João L. Cavalcante and Eric Larose declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavalcante, J.L., Larose, E. Intravascular MRI for Plaque Characterization: Are We Close to Reality?. Curr Cardiol Rep 18, 89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0766-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0766-1

Keywords

Navigation