Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of Elevated Post-Void Residual Volume

  • Published:
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Elevated post-void residual volume (ePVR) also known as chronic urinary retention (CUR) is a chronic condition of incomplete bladder emptying in the absence of pain or discomfort. ePVR may be secondary to several etiologies: obstructive, neurogenic, vascular, myogenic, or a combination of these. It can be further divided into symptomatic (e.g., accompanied with lower urinary tract symptoms), or asymptomatic. In this article, we sought to review the literature regarding definition of ePVR, etiology, clinical significance, initial assessment, treatment, and follow-up.

Recent Findings

We performed a systematic review of current literature and leading urology association guidelines regarding the management of CUR. We recommend using a cut off for of greater than 300mL, in two separate measurements at least 6 months apart for the definition of CUR. Patient with CUR should be divided to low- and high-risk patients, according to their risk of developing complication related to urinary stasis or high intravesical pressure. The management and follow-up recommendations are different in both group and should be aimed at reducing complications and improving quality of life. While low-risk asymptomatic patients may be followed conservatively, high-risk patients should be monitored closely for worsening renal function and interventions may be needed in the high-risk group.

Summary

CUR is a chronic condition whose pathogenesis and complications are not fully understood. Management and follow-up of patients with CUR should be tailored to patient risk. Further research is necessary to better understand the clinical course, pathophysiology, and optimal therapeutic and diagnostic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Kaplan SA, Wein AJ, Staskin DR, Roehrborn CG, Steers WD. Urinary retention and post-void residual urine in men: separating truth from tradition. J Urol. 2008;180(1):47–54. This article is one of the pivotal studies reviewing the literature regarding CUR, it provides comprehensive review aiming to separate evidence-based, from expert-opinion-only arguments in the diagnosis and management of CUR patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Professionals SO. EAU guidelines: management of non-neurogenic male LUTS [Internet]. Uroweb. [cited 2021 Oct 15]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/. The EAU guidelines summarize the evidence regarding numerous tests and treatments in the management of male LUTS, which helps assessing their role in CUR patients.

  4. Asimakopoulos AD, De Nunzio C, Kocjancic E, Tubaro A, Rosier PF, Finazzi-Agrò E. Measurement of post-void residual urine. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(1):55–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim TH, Kim HS, Park JW, Lim OK, Park KD, Lee JK. Falsely elevated postvoid residual urine volume in uterine myoma. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;41(2):332–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballstaedt L, Woodbury B. Bladder post void residual volume. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island. (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 19]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539839/.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Negro CLA, Muir GH. Chronic urinary retention in men: how we define it, and how does it affect treatment outcome. BJU Int. 2012;110(11):1590–4. This study reviews the impact of chronic urinary retention on patients outcome. Negro et al, provide a high-quality review on the evidence supporting various definitions of CUR, as well as the role of CUR in the diagnosis and management of CUR patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention: consensus definition, management strategies, and future opportunities-American Urological Association [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 19]. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/guidelines/chronic-urinary-retention. This is one of the key resources in the management of PVR and provides evidence-based, risk-stratified approach of the management of chronic urinary retention. The AUA guidelines build a consensus definition of CUR, which allows standartization and future research.

  9. Decalf V, Monaghan TF, Denys MA, Petrovic M, Pieters R, Weiss JP, et al. Circadian patterns in postvoid residual and voided percentage among older women with urinary incontinence. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Abrams PH, Dunn M, George N. Urodynamic findings in chronic retention of urine and their relevance to results of surgery. BMJ. 1978;2(6147):1258–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Osman NI, Chapple CR. Contemporary concepts in the aetiopathogenesis of detrusor underactivity. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:639–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Does defective volume sensation contribute to detrusor underactivity? - Smith - 2015 - Neurourology and Urodynamics - Wiley Online Library [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 11]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.22653.

  13. Wein AJ. Re: does defective volume sensation contribute to detrusor underactivity? J Urol. 2017;197(1):218–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoffel JT. Non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention: what are we treating? Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(9):74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aldamanhori R, Chapple CR. Underactive bladder, detrusor underactivity, definition, symptoms, epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, and risk factors. Curr Opin Urol. 2017 May;27(3):293–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Truzzi JCI, Almeida FMR, Nunes EC, Sadi MV. Residual urinary volume and urinary tract infection—when are they linked? J Urol. 2008;180(1):182–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Breyer BN, Shinohara K. Re: residual urinary volume and urinary tract infection—when are they linked? J Urol. 2009;181(2):919–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Töz E, Kurt S, Sahin Ç, Canda MT. Frequency of recurrent urinary tract infection in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Res Rep Urol. 2015 Jan;28(7):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. May M, Brookman -Amissah Sabine, Hoschke B, Gilfrich C, Braun KP, Kendel F. Post-void residual urine as a predictor of urinary tract infection—is there a cutoff value in asymptomatic men? J Urol. 2009;181(6):2540–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Omli R, Skotnes LH, Mykletun A, Bakke AM, Kuhry E. Residual urine as a risk factor for lower urinary tract infection: a 1-year follow-up study in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(5):871–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hampson SJ, Noble JG, Rickards D, Milroy EJG. Does residual urine predispose to urinary tract infection? Br J Urol. 1992;70(5):506–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barabas G, Mölstad S. No association between elevated post-void residual volume and bacteriuria in residents of nursing homes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005;23(1):52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolman C, Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Lieber MM. Distribution of post-void residual urine volume in randomly selected men. J Urol. 1999;161(1):122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scofield S, Kaplan SA. Voiding dysfunction in men: pathophysiology and risk factors. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20(S3):S2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roehrborn CG, Kaplan SA, Lee MW, Slawin KM, McVary KT, Kusek JW, et al. 1638: baseline post void residual urine volume as a predictor of urinary outcomes in men with BPH in the MTOPS study. J Urol. 2005;173(4S):443–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rule AD, Jacobson DJ, McGREE ME, Girman CJ, Lieber MM, Jacobsen SJ. Longitudinal changes in post-void residual and voided volume among community dwelling men. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Part 1):1317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mochtar CA, Kiemeney LALM, Van Riemsdijk MM, Laguna MP, Debruyne FMJ, De La Rosette JJMCH. Post-void residual urine volume is not a good predictor of the need for invasive therapy among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2006;175(1):213–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction in men: minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up of untreated bladder outlet obstruction - Thomas - 2005 - BJU International - Wiley Online Library [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 11]. Available from: https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05815.x.

  29. Styles RA, Neal DE, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD. Long-term monitoring of bladder pressure in chronic retention of urine: the relationship between detrusor activity and upper tract dilatation. J Urol. 1988;140(2):330–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rule AD, Lieber MM, Jacobsen SJ. Is benign prostatic hyperplasia a risk factor for chronic renal failure? J Urol. 2005;173(3):691–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamasaki T, Naganuma T, Iguchi T, Kuroki Y, Kuwabara N, Takemoto Y, et al. Association between chronic kidney disease and small residual urine volumes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nephrology. 2011;16(3):335–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hong SK, Lee ST, Jeong SJ, Byun SS, Hong YK, Park DS, et al. Chronic kidney disease among men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2010;105(10):1424–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Childs MA, Mynderse LA, Rangel LJ, Wilson TM, Lingeman JE, Krambeck AE. Pathogenesis of bladder calculi in the presence of urinary stasis. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1347–51. Childs et al studied prospectively the impact of urinary stasis secondary to bladder outlet obstruction on stone development in male patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Philippou P, Volanis D, Kariotis I, Serafetinidis E, Delakas D. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct? Urology. 2011;78(1):43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang W, Cao JJ, Cao M, Wu HS, Yang YY, Xu ZM, et al. Risk factors for bladder calculi in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(32):e7728.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Verhamme KMC, Sturkenboom MCJM, Stricker BHC, Bosch R. Drug-induced urinary retention. Drug Saf. 2008;31(5):373–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Serlin DC, Heidelbaugh JJ, Stoffel JT. Urinary retention in adults: evaluation and initial management. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(8):496–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bright E, Cotterill N, Drake M, Abrams P. Developing and validating the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire bladder diary. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):294–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Das AK, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline part I—initial work-up and medical management. J Urol. 2021;206(4):806–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fisher E, Subramonian K, Omar MI. The role of alpha blockers prior to removal of urethral catheter for acute urinary retention in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10(6):CD006744.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kim DK. Current pharmacological and surgical treatment of underactive bladder. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58(Suppl 2):S90–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Martín-Merino E, García-Rodríguez LA, Massó-González EL, Roehrborn CG. Do oral antimuscarinic drugs carry an increased risk of acute urinary retention? J Urol. 2009;182(4):1442–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sacco E, Bientinesi R. Mirabegron: a review of recent data and its prospects in the management of overactive bladder. Ther Adv Urol. 2012;4(6):315–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Das AK, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline part II—surgical evaluation and treatment. J Urol. 2021;206(4):818–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Campeau L, Al-Afraa T, Corcos J. Evaluation and management of urinary retention after a suburethral sling procedure in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2008;9(5):412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB, Elhilali MM, Fall M, Gajewski JB, et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol. 2001;165(1):15–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gross C, Habli M, Lindsell C, South M. Sacral neuromodulation for nonobstructive urinary retention: a meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(4):249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. White WM, Dobmeyer-Dittrich C, Klein FA, Wallace LS. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary retention: long-term efficacy and durability. Urology. 2008;71(1):71–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Szymański JK, Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak A, Jakiel G. Fowler’s syndrome—the cause of urinary retention in young women, often forgotten, but significant and challenging to treat. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Coolen RL, Groen J, Scheepe JR, Blok BFM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat idiopathic nonobstructive urinary retention: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1184–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kavanagh A, Stewart J, Boone T. Reduction Cystoplasty. In: Chapple CR, Wein AJ, Osman NI, editors. Underactive bladder [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. p. 63–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43087-4_9.

  52. Ninkovic M, Stenzl A, Schwabegger A, Bartsch G, Prosser R. Free neurovascular transfer of latissimus dorsi muscle for the treatment of bladder acontractility: II Clinical results. J Urol. 2003;169(4):1379–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Expectant long-term follow-up of patients with chronic urinary retention - Abello - 2019 - Neurourology and Urodynamics - Wiley Online Library [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.23853.

  54. Bates TS, Sugiono M, James ED, Stott MA, Pocock RD. Is the conservative management of chronic retention in men ever justified? BJU Int. 2003;92(6):581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Al-Hayek S, Thomas A, Abrams P. Natural history of detrusor contractility--minimum ten-year urodynamic follow-up in men with bladder outlet obstruction and those with detrusor. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2004;215:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study supported by Grant P30 CA008748 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaspreet S. Sandhu.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mekayten, M., Sandhu, J.S. Management of Elevated Post-Void Residual Volume. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 18, 201–209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-023-00706-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-023-00706-6

Keywords

Navigation