Skip to main content
Log in

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Latest Developments and New Frontiers

  • Women and Ischemic Heart Disease (P. Kohli, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized entity leading to myocardial infarction especially in women. Multiple observational studies have been published in the recent years. This review summarizes the current body of knowledge and recent developments in SCAD epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and management.

Recent Findings

Contemporary series have estimated the incidence of SCAD to be up to ~ 4% of all patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Fibromuscular dysplasia, hormonal therapy, multiparity, connective tissue disorders, and systemic inflammatory diseases have been identified as predisposing factors for SCAD. Although SCAD typically presents as ACS, emerging evidence shows that cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest are not uncommon, with higher incidence of complication among peripartum women. Advances in SCAD diagnosis include a novel angiographic classification of SCAD and the use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound to aid in diagnosis. Management depends on clinical stability and the presence of high-risk features. Beta-blockers are the mainstay of medical therapy long term and was shown to reduce recurrent SCAD. The largest study to date including 750 patients across 22 North American centers showed that the majority of patients was managed conservatively and that the technical success rates of percutaneous coronary intervention were low. Following discharge, SCAD-specific cardiac rehabilitation had been shown to have long-term cardiovascular benefits.

Summary

The recent years have seen a surge in SCAD awareness and publication. Centralized patient networks as well as core lab interpretation of diagnostic data have contributed significantly to the growing body of knowledge. Current efforts to delineate the pathogenesis of SCAD; improve medical and revascularization therapy; and understand complications such as cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest will serve as foundational building blocks for future research and innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Saw J, Mancini GBJ, Humphries KH. Contemporary review on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:297–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pretty H. Dissecting aneurysm of coronary artery in a woman aged 42: rupture. BMJ. 1931;1:667.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tweet MS, Gulati R, Aase LA, Hayes SN. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a disease-specific, social networking community-initiated study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:845–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fontanelli A, Olivari Z, La Vecchia L, Basso C, Pagliani L, Marzocchi A, et al. Spontaneous dissections of coronary arteries and acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the DISCOVERY, a multicenter prospective registry with a case-control group. J Cardiovasc Med Hagerstown Md. 2009;10:94–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vanzetto G, Berger-Coz E, Barone-Rochette G, Chavanon O, Bouvaist H, Hacini R, et al. Prevalence, therapeutic management and medium-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: results from a database of 11,605 patients. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio Thorac Surg. 2009;35:250–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:645–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. •• Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000564First North American position statement on management of SCAD. Summarizes recent findings and identifies knowledge gaps in current research.

  8. Adlam D, Alfonso F, Maas A, Vrints C, Writing Committee, al-Hussaini A, et al. European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3353–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Saw J, Mancini GBJ, Humphries K, Fung A, Boone R, Starovoytov A, et al. Angiographic appearance of spontaneous coronary artery dissection with intramural hematoma proven on intracoronary imaging. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2016;87:E54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saw J. Coronary angiogram classification of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2014;84:1115–22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maehara A, Mintz GS, Castagna MT, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Waksman R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:466–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maas AHEM, Bouatia-Naji N, Persu A, Adlam D. Spontaneous coronary artery dissections and fibromuscular dysplasia: current insights on pathophysiology, sex and gender. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:220–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee C, Starovoytov A, Saw J. Case reports of coronary fibromuscular dysplasia and spontaneous coronary artery dissections. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2019;93:631–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. •• Saw J, Starovoytov A, Humphries K, et al. Canadian spontaneous coronary artery dissection cohort study: in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1188–97 This is the largest comprehensive multicenter cohort study to date of SCAD patients examining risk factors, presentation, management and outcomes.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Krittanawong C, Kumar A, Johnson KW, Luo Y, Yue B, Wang Z, et al. Conditions and factors associated with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (from a national population-based cohort study). Am J Cardiol. 2019;123:249–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henkin S, Negrotto SM, Tweet MS, Kirmani S, Deyle DR, Gulati R, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and its association with heritable connective tissue disorders. Heart Br Card Soc. 2016;102:876–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goel K, Tweet M, Olson TM, Maleszewski JJ, Gulati R, Hayes SN. Familial spontaneous coronary artery dissection: evidence for genetic susceptibility. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:821–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mortensen KH, Thuesen L, Kristensen IB, Christiansen EH. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a Western Denmark heart registry study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2009;74:710–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alfonso F, Bastante T, García-Guimaraes M, Pozo E, Cuesta J, Rivero F, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: new insights into diagnosis and treatment. Coron Artery Dis. 2016;27:696–706.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakashima T, Noguchi T, Haruta S, Yamamoto Y, Oshima S, Nakao K, et al. Prognostic impact of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the angina pectoris-myocardial infarction multicenter Investigators in Japan. Int J Cardiol. 2016;207:341–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rashid HNZ, Wong DTL, Wijesekera H, Gutman SJ, Shanmugam VB, Gulati R, et al. Incidence and characterisation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection as a cause of acute coronary syndrome--a single-centre Australian experience. Int J Cardiol. 2016;202:336–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishiguchi T, Tanaka A, Ozaki Y, Taruya A, Fukuda S, Taguchi H, et al. Prevalence of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5:263–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saw J, Aymong E, Mancini GBJ, Sedlak T, Starovoytov A, Ricci D. Nonatherosclerotic coronary artery disease in young women. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:814–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahmoud AN, Taduru SS, Mentias A, Mahtta D, Barakat AF, Saad M, et al. Trends of incidence, clinical presentation, and in-hospital mortality among women with acute myocardial infarction with or without spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a population-based analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:80–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lettieri C, Zavalloni D, Rossini R, Morici N, Ettori F, Leonzi O, et al. Management and long-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:66–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJM, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:777–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rogowski S, Maeder MT, Weilenmann D, Haager PK, Ammann P, Rohner F, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic follow-up and long-term clinical outcome in a predominantly medically treated population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2017;89:59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Motreff P, Malcles G, Combaret N, et al. How and when to suspect spontaneous coronary artery dissection: novel insights from a single-centre series on prevalence and angiographic appearance. EuroIntervention J Eur Collab Work Group Interv Cardiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2017;12:e2236–43.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Havakuk O, Goland S, Mehra A, Elkayam U. Pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: an analysis of 120 contemporary cases. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004941.

  30. Faden MS, Bottega N, Benjamin A, Brown RN. A nationwide evaluation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in pregnancy and the puerperium. Heart Br Card Soc. 2016;102:1974–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Elkayam U, Jalnapurkar S, Barakkat MN, Khatri N, Kealey AJ, Mehra A, et al. Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction: a review of contemporary experience in 150 cases between 2006 and 2011. Circulation. 2014;129:1695–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yip A, Saw J. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection-a review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015;5:37–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Codsi E, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:426–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Alfonso F, Paulo M, Gonzalo N, Dutary J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Lennie V, et al. Diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection by optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1073–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saw J, Poulter R, Fung A. Intracoronary imaging of coronary fibromuscular dysplasia with OCT and IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2013;82:E879–83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Writing Panel, Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, et al. 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in emergency department patients with chest pain: a joint document of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. J Am Coll Radiol JACR. 2016;13:e1–e29.

    Google Scholar 

  37. American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents, Mark DB, Berman DS, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on expert consensus documents. Circulation. 2010;121:2509–43.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stefanini GG, Windecker S. Can coronary computed tomography angiography replace invasive angiography? Coronary computed tomography angiography cannot replace invasive angiography. Circulation. 2015;131:418–25 discussion 426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tweet MS, Gulati R, Williamson EE, Vrtiska TJ, Hayes SN. Multimodality imaging for spontaneous coronary artery dissection in women. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:436–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Roura G, Ariza-Solé A, Rodriguez-Caballero IF, Gomez-Lara J, Ferreiro JL, Romaguera R, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection with CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:896–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Saw J, Humphries K, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Prakash R, Starovoytov A, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1148–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e139–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Focused 2012 Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23978596-focused-2012-update-of-the-canadian-cardiovascular-society-guidelines-for-the-use-of-antiplatelet-therapy/?from_single_result=ccs+guideline+non-st-elevation. Accessed 15 Mar 2020.

  44. Ferrari E, Tozzi P, von Segesser LK. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a young woman: from emergency coronary artery bypass grafting to heart transplantation. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2005;28:349–51.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Patanè F, Boffini M, Sansone F, Campanella A, Rinaldi M. ECMO as a bridge to transplantation in biventricular dysfunction due to primary spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant. 2009;22:500–2.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sanghera P, Ravipati V, Kalapura T, Test V. Improving mortality in cardiogenic shock from spontaneous coronary artery dissection with percutaneous external heart assist: a case report. CHEST. 2013;144:140A.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Padukone A, Sayeed AK, Marczin N, García Sáez D, Zych B, Mohite PN, et al. Salvage myocardial revascularisation in spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection with cardiogenic shock - the role of mechanical circulatory support. Perfusion. 2017;32:171–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. McKechnie RS, Patel D, Eitzman DT, Rajagopalan S, Murthy TH. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a pregnant woman. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:899–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Knapp KE, Weis RA, Cubillo EI, Chapital AB, Ramakrishna H. Spontaneous, postpartum coronary artery dissection and cardiogenic shock with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation assisted recovery in a 30-year-old patient. Case Rep Cardiol. 2016;2016:1048708.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Chou AY, Prakash R, Rajala J, Birnie T, Isserow S, Taylor CM, et al. The first dedicated cardiac rehabilitation program for patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection: description and initial results. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32:554–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Saw.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Saw reports grants from CIHR, grants from Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada, other from Michael Smith Foundation of Health Research, grants and personal fees from AbbottVascular, grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Yang and Dr. Alfadhel have nothing to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Women and Ischemic Heart Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Alfadhel, M. & Saw, J. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Latest Developments and New Frontiers. Curr Atheroscler Rep 22, 49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-020-00866-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-020-00866-4

Keywords

Navigation